Started By
Message
locked post

Blue chip ratio correlation to winning it all?

Posted on 7/19/25 at 11:13 am
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
18299 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 11:13 am
LINK

...

It is not a requirement to make the College Football Playoff. Teams with sub-50% BCRs have made the four-team field, and many made the 12-team field. But, once you're there, the bar goes up. The difference between making the playoff and winning it is enormous.

It is not a substitute for culture, coaching, player development, health or quarterback play. All of those things matter. But none of them matter more than talent acquisition when it comes to separating the very good from the elite.

Here's the full list of modern champions and their Blue-Chip Ratios at the time:

2024: Ohio State (90%)

2023: Michigan (54%)

2022: Georgia (77%)

2021: Georgia (80%)

2020: Alabama (83%)

2019: LSU (64%)

2018: Clemson (61%)

2017: Alabama (80%)

2016: Clemson (52%)

2015: Alabama (77%)

2014: Ohio State (68%)

2013: Florida State (53%)

2012: Alabama (71%)

2011: Alabama (71%)

............................................

2025 Blue-Chip Ratio

School BCR

Alabama 89%

Ohio State 89%

Georgia 84%

Texas A&M 82%

Oregon 78%

Texas 78%

LSU 73%

Notre Dame 73%

Oklahoma 70%

Penn State 68%

Miami 64%

Florida 64%

Auburn 64%

Michigan 57%

USC 57%

Clemson 55%

Tennessee 54%

Florida State 54%

...
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
23534 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 11:19 am to
Winner will come from this list

Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
54755 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 11:31 am to
So teams are only good when they have good players? Got it.
Posted by GetPiggywithIt
We suck at football
Member since Dec 2022
3982 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 11:32 am to
quote:

So teams are only good when they have good players? Got it.
yeah this is Paul Finebaum level research
This post was edited on 7/19/25 at 11:33 am
Posted by Boomer00
Member since Sep 2015
3850 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 12:45 pm to
FSU, Michigan and Clemson have won with low ratios. Coaching is still king.
This post was edited on 7/19/25 at 12:46 pm
Posted by TriStateAreaFootball
Member since Dec 2024
1536 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 12:46 pm to
You're looking at this wrong. It's the other way around.



They're considered "blue-chips" because they signed with the successful school that they play for.
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
23534 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

FSU, Michigan and Clemson have won with low ratios. Coaching is still king.


I agree but that under a different system. You need some great depth now along with them being mostly blue chippers. You play either 3 or 4 games to win the title vs less under prior winners.

I just think it will matter more under new system but we’ll need some years to see how it shakes out.
Posted by EastTXHorn
Houston
Member since Jan 2019
1669 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 1:01 pm to
Texas has invested a ton of capital to retain that 78%. The narrative when we win the national title is we bought the best roster. We spent the most to retain the players we believe in and developed.
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 1:04 pm to
motherfricker couldnt include 2010?

Posted by kajunman
Member since Dec 2015
7593 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 1:06 pm to
OSU paid the most last season to win. Straight up bought a natty. Even Day couldn't frick it up for them.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25629 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

The narrative when we win the national title is we bought the best roster.


When was this the narrative?
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
14547 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

They're considered "blue-chips" because they signed with the successful school that they play for.


You sure bout that
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
14547 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

motherfricker couldnt include 2010?


Auburn had two top ten and two top twenty classes the four previous classes, I think it's weird how the story was it was some David v Goliath story.
Posted by KirbySmartass
Member since Jul 2020
2911 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

FSU, Michigan and Clemson have won with low ratios. Coaching is still king.


None of those programs are going to be legitimately competing for a natty any time soon.
Posted by EastTXHorn
Houston
Member since Jan 2019
1669 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:27 pm to
The “40million dollar Roster” conversation has dominated Texas Football discussion this off-season. As if it equates to the best roster. In the eyes of Texas fans it is, in terms of recruiting rankings, it’s not even the best in the State.
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Auburn had two top ten and two top twenty classes the four previous classes, I think it's weird how the story was it was some David v Goliath story.
our second half defense that year was legendary.
Posted by Tammany Tom
Mandeville
Member since Jun 2004
5249 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

FSU, Michigan and Clemson have won with low ratios. Coaching is still king.


This is just blatantly false.

All 3 of these teams were loaded with talent when they won it all!!!!

The 2013 Florida State Championship team had a Blue Chip ratio of 53% led by #1 overall NFL draft pick Jameis Winston & 1st round pick Jalen Ramsey.

The 2016 & 2018 National Championship teams of Clemson had a 52% Blue Chip ratio led by 1st round pick Deshaun Watson and the 2018 team had a 61% Blue Chip ratio led by #1 overall NFL pick Trevor Lawrence.

The 2023 Michigan championship tesm had a Blue Chip ratio of 56% and had 13 players drafted by the NFL in the 2024 draft led by 1st round pick JJ McCarthy.


Posted by HorninHouston
Member since Sep 2024
1742 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

So teams are only good when they have good players? Got it.


Shocking right?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69109 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Even Day couldn't frick it up for them.


He certainly tried.

Without the expanded playoff in 2024 I feel like he would have been fired after losing to an unranked Michigan team at home.
Posted by kajunman
Member since Dec 2015
7593 posts
Posted on 7/19/25 at 3:52 pm to
quote:


Without the expanded playoff in 2024 I feel like he would have been fired after losing to an unranked Michigan team at home.
Agree. When Dame made their comeback there were a lot of rear ends in the stands puckering.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter