Started By
Message
Way-too-early college football top 25 rankings for the 2025-26 season
Posted on 2/24/25 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 2/24/25 at 8:43 pm
This site listed LSU at #8, Illinois at #9, and South Carolina at#11. What a joke! Missouri unranked?! LOL
LINK
LINK
Posted on 2/24/25 at 8:53 pm to TrueLefty
I could see Missouri being unranked before I would laugh at lsu at 8 I know that for a fact . Mizery lost 3 should have been 4 games with the softest sec schedule ever . Your ooc is way worse than being laughable .
This post was edited on 2/24/25 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 2/24/25 at 8:59 pm to Soonerd78
Probably cause mizzou breaking in new qb
South Carolina lost a ton on defense but sellers getting a lot of love
Illinois brings a lot of starters back and could be a dark horse for playoff
LSU returns one of top qb in country
South Carolina lost a ton on defense but sellers getting a lot of love
Illinois brings a lot of starters back and could be a dark horse for playoff
LSU returns one of top qb in country
Posted on 2/24/25 at 9:03 pm to Soonerd78
quote:
I could see Missouri being unranked before I would laugh at lsu at 8 I know that for a fact . Mizery lost 3 should have been 4 games with the softest sec schedule ever . Your ooc is way worse than being laughable .
Mizzou came close to beating South Carolina at South Carolina. This time will be coming to Missouri. Look at the Illinois roster. Where are the 5* and 4* talents? Similar to the Indiana roster. Just because Illinois beat South Carolina in a bowl game doesn't mean Illinois is going to be much better. I am going to say Illinois and South Carolina will end up ranked behind Missouri at the end of the season.
Posted on 2/24/25 at 9:12 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
This time will be coming to Missouri. Look at the Illinois roster. Where are the 5* and 4* talents?
It not easy to win if you don't have the talents. This is what I have been saying! BK have the talents but only beat Drinkworst by 10. But Drinkworst have no talents and beat UMASS on the road! I am laugh at these rankings!
Posted on 2/24/25 at 9:16 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Probably cause mizzou breaking in new qb
South Carolina lost a ton on defense but sellers getting a lot of love
Illinois brings a lot of starters back and could be a dark horse for playoff
LSU returns one of top qb in country
Mizzou's new quarterback is by far much better than Cook. The DC and DL coach have 1 year experience and that is huge. We aren't talking about replacing a 4* quarterback. Cook was rated as a low 3* quarterback and no power of 5 recruited him out of HS. Cook came in as a transfer. It was his leadership and the star running back the year before that made the difference. The running back was the weakest link last year and he is gone. Ole Miss got him. Thank goodness for that. Got a better one from the transfer portal. Then there are a lot more transfers coming in and should be better. Almost all defensive players are coming back. So I don't get it. I guess it is a wait and see if this PSU transfer quarterback is the real deal or not.
Posted on 2/24/25 at 9:21 pm to Imber
quote:
It not easy to win if you don't have the talents. This is what I have been saying! BK have the talents but only beat Drinkworst by 10. But Drinkworst have no talents and beat UMASS on the road! I am laugh at these rankings!


Posted on 2/24/25 at 9:22 pm to Imber
quote:
This time will be coming to Missouri. Look at the Illinois roster. Where are the 5* and 4* talents?
It not easy to win if you don't have the talents. This is what I have been saying! BK have the talents but only beat Drinkworst by 10. But Drinkworst have no talents and beat UMASS on the road! I am laugh at these rankings!
That is called coaching to their potential. That is on BK for not getting it done.
This post was edited on 2/24/25 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 2/24/25 at 9:37 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
Mizzou came close to beating South Carolina at South Carolina.
How Mizzou lose to South Carolina when Mizzou has higher talents and South Carolina have lower talents? Wow! Here is what I am saying that Drinkwitz is holding Missouri back from winning games vs lesser talents.
Posted on 2/24/25 at 9:47 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Mizzou came close to beating South Carolina at South Carolina.
How Mizzou lose to South Carolina when Mizzou has higher talents and South Carolina have lower talents? Wow! Here is what I am saying that Drinkwitz is holding Missouri back from winning games vs lesser talents.
Mizzou wasn't more talented at the quarterback position. This time Drinkwitz got a 4* quarterback transfer, That is by far the best quarterback he has gotten while being the HC at Missouri. He should be the starter this coming season. Plus he had to replace both the DC and DL coach. Horn is the best one he has gotten but he got hurt and looks like he is sticking to baseball.
This post was edited on 2/24/25 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 2/24/25 at 9:49 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
Mizzou wasn't more talented at the quarterback position. This time Drinkwitz got a 4* quarterback transfer, That is by far the best quarterback he has gotten while being the HC at Missouri. Plus he had to replace both the DC and DL coach.
I do not think you are understanding that Mizzou had more talents and Drinkwitz can not beat lesser talents at South Carolina. This is on Drinkwitz. Stop making excuse for coach who can not beat lesser talents.
Posted on 2/24/25 at 10:24 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
I do not think you are understanding that Mizzou had more talents and Drinkwitz can not beat lesser talents at South Carolina. This is on Drinkwitz. Stop making excuse for coach who can not beat lesser talents.
LOL
I guess you are really that dumb. I am looking forward to seeing Mizzou getting back to winning 10 games again. Will LSU win 10 or more regular season games this coming season? We shall see.
Posted on 2/24/25 at 10:26 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
LOL
I guess you are really that dumb. I am looking forward to seeing Mizzou getting back to winning 10 games again. Will LSU win 10 or more regular season games this coming season? We shall see.
Here is what I am saying. Drinkwitz is play weak schedule and still do not beat some team with lesser talents. This is on Drinkwitz.
Posted on 2/24/25 at 10:51 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Here is what I am saying. Drinkwitz is play weak schedule and still do not beat some team with lesser talents. This is on Drinkwitz.
Please list them. Mizzou lost 3 games. last year. which ones had lesser talent roster than Mizzou that was impactful? South Carolina isn't one of them. Alabama? Nope! Texas A&M? Nope! South Carolina is a push and the game was at South Carolina.
Posted on 2/24/25 at 10:53 pm to TrueLefty
Missouri is not relevant in college athletics. Maybe some day it will win a title and get on the map, but I doubt it.
Posted on 2/24/25 at 10:58 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
Please list them. Mizzou lost 3 games. last year. which ones had lesser talent roster than Mizzou that was impactful? South Carolina isn't one of them. Alabama? Nope! Texas A&M? Nope! South Carolina is a push and the game was at South Carolina.
South Carolina have lesser talents than Mizzou I am not sure why you say they do not have lesser talents. Stop make excuses for coach who can not beat lesser talents. This is on Drinkwitz for holding Mizzou back.
Posted on 2/24/25 at 11:01 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
South Carolina have lesser talents than Mizzou I am not sure why you say they do not have lesser talents. Stop make excuses for coach who can not beat lesser talents. This is on Drinkwitz for holding Mizzou back.
South Carolina is a push and the game was at South Carolina.
Posted on 2/24/25 at 11:02 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
South Carolina is a push and the game was at South Carolina.
Your excuse do not change fact that South Carolina have lesser talents than Mizzou's higher talents. This lose is on Drinkwitz for not beating lower talents, he should beat lower talents like South Carolina. This is truth.
Posted on 2/24/25 at 11:09 pm to SidewalkTiger
Jeez this thread pretty much sums up why no one and no mean know can stand a fricking Missouri fan. I get it guys you beat a few decent sec teams last year and are having your best years in a while but if you really look at what your accomplishing with the schedule you had it’s not great . If you had a Florida , OU, Bama, UGA schedule then you would have 5-7 losses. Play 7 top 15 teams wins most of those games and then you will get the respect . There was a reason you were one of the last place 3 loss teams all year .
This post was edited on 2/24/25 at 11:10 pm
Popular
Back to top
