Started By
Message
re: Honest discussion about NIL. Would love to hear thoughts.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:23 am to pankReb
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:23 am to pankReb
quote:
Free market capitalism says differently.
Once again it is not capitalism when you aren't allowing one of the parties to set their terms. It's the opposite of capitalism.
quote:
Imagine thinking that revenue can ONLY come from one source.
Imagine not knowing the difference between revenue and profits.
quote:
Nope. I never said any of the above. You’re just making that shite up.
No, that is exactly what you are saying when you don't allow one of the parties involved to set their own terms.
You, like most idiots these days, just don't like it when the reality of your policies and opinions are pointed out. You all want to live in this bullshite fantasy world where can just run around labeling shite whatever, when the labels don't even remotely match the reality.
quote:
You keep repeating this as if it’s true. Stop making shite up. The government isn’t removing anyone’s rights or protections.
The government is removing the rights of the schools to enter into contracts and agreements as they see fit.
You literally want to force the schools hands on what they can and can not do. Not capitalism.
quote:
I don’t have to start any other league. You’re the one crying like an idiotic bitch about NIL. And yes, NIL is a fine example of free market capitalism.
Except for the part where you tell other people they can't make rules or decide from themselves how to deal with it.
If it was a free market, the schools would be able to decide for themselves how to deal with it.
Government intervention is the opposite of a free market unless it's for criminal reasons.
quote:
And there it is…..the full meltdown of someone who has lost all ability of logical thought.
Why are you even still here? You obviously hate what college sports has turned into. What happened to those other hobbies you said you had?
You are the one claiming people don't want it because it won't benefit it. Which means you must want it because you think you will benefit since that is your frame of reference on the topic.
But you won't. Just like your #20 class last year, Ole Miss is going to stay the team that has never accomplished shite in it's entire history. Alabama and other top teams are going to get richer, win even more than they already do and cherry pick whatever quality might be available on your otherwise shitty roster.
So if you want to use government to benefit your football team, you might want to start looking at more drastic measures.
In 10 years, Ole Miss won't even be part of the SEC any more. You don't even realize the replacements have already begun and that we will end up with a 32 team super league that breaks away from the NCAA. When you turn college football into a full fledge business, the rights of "students" is going to go out the window and so will any reason to keep bottom tier teams around.
Turns out, the only way Ole Miss can get top tier players is when they are the only ones that are cheating and paying players. Once it opened up, Ole Miss recruiting suddenly goes to shite. The thing people like you claimed would happen to top tier teams.
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 9:28 am
2
Posted on 4/25/24 at 10:08 am to 3down10
quote:
Once again it is not capitalism when you aren't allowing one of the parties to set their terms.
Hysterical that you post these words with a straight face.
quote:
Imagine not knowing the difference between revenue and profits.
Income is revenue. You’re absolutely mental.
quote:
No, that is exactly what you are saying when you don't allow one of the parties involved to set their own terms.
Once again. fricking hysterical.
quote:
The government is removing the rights of the schools to enter into contracts and agreements as they see fit.
No. They aren’t. This is something you just keep fabricating in hopes of fitting your dogshit argument.
quote:
You literally want to force the schools hands on what they can and can not do.
And you literally want to force the student athletes hands on what they can and cannot do.
quote:
Except for the part where you tell other people they can't make rules or decide from themselves how to deal with it.
Once again. Hysterical.
quote:
You are the one claiming people don't want it because it won't benefit it. Which means you must want it because you think you will benefit since that is your frame of reference on the topic.
Link me saying anything remotely close to whatever the frick drivel you’re typing.
The rest of your post is essentially word soup. Nothing of relevance or logic.
You are the one upset over the current landscape of football. Once again….why are you still here? You obviously hate the idea of players being able to negotiate their terms of revenue. No amount of you vomiting on your keyboard will change this. Is continuing to cry about it a coping mechanism for you? You’ve shown to everyone that your arguments are idiotic and you have double-standards. Do you plan on logging off forever or are you just going to confirm me calling you an arm-chair Dabo Sweeney?
Posted on 4/25/24 at 10:19 am to 3down10
quote:You have some very interesting takes.
The government is removing the rights of the schools to enter into contracts and agreements as they see fit.
You literally want to force the schools hands on what they can and can not do. Not capitalism.
I'm curious if you in any way work in actual business that involves contracts... contracts are highly regulated by the government to ensure fair dealings.
A perfect example is non-competes - must generally be very limited in scope and timeframe and tailored purposefully. You can't just make a non-compete that says "you can never sell shoes in the US for the rest of your life".
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 10:22 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News