Started By
Message

re: Honest discussion about NIL. Would love to hear thoughts.

Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:33 am to
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30306 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:33 am to
quote:

NIL should only come from any legit business opportunity that uses their name, like, and image.

No pay for play from boosters or the university period. Your money either comes from a legit, pre-verified and vetted service you are providing or not at all. And if I had it my way, you only get it your junior or senior season. Should never be an incentive to sign with any program.

The transfer portal should only be open after your sophomore year and later. And then for only verifiable hardship cases or legitimate cases where it can be reasonably proved you'll get more playing time.
This would have been the ideal set up and had the school presidents & AD's gotten off their arse and pushed this plan through NCAA legislation student-athletes would've been satisfied, it would've never been necessary for a ruling by the Supreme Court.

As things stand today, there's no going back and the NCAA has no leg to stand on.



Posted by BevoBucks
H-town
Member since Dec 2022
4086 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:36 am to
quote:

student-athletes would've been satisfied,
As a whole, I think they still were. But, anytime lawyers see huge piles of cash and unending billable hours, the crusade for “justice” begins.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter