Started By
Message

re: College Football Blue Bloods: Ranking The 25 Best Football Schools

Posted on 4/15/24 at 1:17 pm to
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23144 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

I think recent success should matter if we’re going to talk about current blue blood football programs.


I just think the definition is different. Blue Blood isn't "current" it's all time. They don't rotate.

If OSU was terrible for a decade in a row they would still be a blue blood. Bama did nothing in between 1995 and 2007. Doesn't mean they weren't a blue blood during that entire time

Posted by Bama Bird
Member since Dec 2011
Member since Mar 2013
19142 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

If OSU was terrible for a decade in a row they would still be a blue blood. Bama did nothing in between 1995 and 2007. Doesn't mean they weren't a blue blood during that entire time



Yeah, people just don't get it. Blue blood isn't about a 10 year period, but a 100-year period. The 8 programs have been great programs since, at least, the 1920s and have always bounced back.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
26627 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

I just think the definition is different. Blue Blood isn't "current" it's all time. They don't rotate.

If OSU was terrible for a decade in a row they would still be a blue blood. Bama did nothing in between 1995 and 2007. Doesn't mean they weren't a blue blood during that entire time


Right.

The simplest explanation of blueblood is this: they're the teams that have almost always been there. There are only a handful, as in most sports.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter