Started By
Message
re: Is Saban correct about NIL ruining college athletics as we know it?
Posted on 3/16/24 at 1:02 pm to Ag Zwin
Posted on 3/16/24 at 1:02 pm to Ag Zwin
Did Texas A&M get guys because they loved A&M or because they were paid under the table?
Scholarships should be 3 year contracts. But a player can transfer and play immediately if the head coach leaves or it’s to a school within driving range if there’s a family sickness ( lawyers can spell that out). Anyone else 1 year sit.
Money can not be offered through any collective. Money has to be negotiated by play and NIL recipient.
Let’s get back to what NIL was intended for….
Players using their likeness to profit on merch, gaming, endorsements.
This should be done through marketing departments at the school ( helps marketing students too) once they are signed to a ( 3 year deal).
Scholarships should be 3 year contracts. But a player can transfer and play immediately if the head coach leaves or it’s to a school within driving range if there’s a family sickness ( lawyers can spell that out). Anyone else 1 year sit.
Money can not be offered through any collective. Money has to be negotiated by play and NIL recipient.
Let’s get back to what NIL was intended for….
Players using their likeness to profit on merch, gaming, endorsements.
This should be done through marketing departments at the school ( helps marketing students too) once they are signed to a ( 3 year deal).
Posted on 3/17/24 at 10:05 am to GeauxtigersMs36
quote:
Did Texas A&M get guys because they loved A&M or because they were paid under the table?
Why are you singling out A&M here?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News