Started By
Message
re: Why are some fan bases scared of the NCAA losing power?
Posted on 3/2/24 at 9:58 am to 404 Error
Posted on 3/2/24 at 9:58 am to 404 Error
I personally could care less if the NCAA exists or not.
The part of the NCAA lawsuit that I don't like isn't about the NCAA losing power. I simply believe that enforcing a prohibition on paying recruits to come to a school would be good for college football. I think it's a good rule that should be enforced strongly. I'm disappointed that pay for play is going to be how it works in college football going forward.
If whatever organization runs college football could prevent any NIL contracts from having any conditions that effectively require a player to attend a particular college, I think it would fix 95% of the problems that exist with NIL.
I'm a bit disappointed that as soon as the NCAA tried to enforce that rule, the rule effectively got thrown away.
It's not the end of the world, but I think it's bad for the sport.
The part of the NCAA lawsuit that I don't like isn't about the NCAA losing power. I simply believe that enforcing a prohibition on paying recruits to come to a school would be good for college football. I think it's a good rule that should be enforced strongly. I'm disappointed that pay for play is going to be how it works in college football going forward.
If whatever organization runs college football could prevent any NIL contracts from having any conditions that effectively require a player to attend a particular college, I think it would fix 95% of the problems that exist with NIL.
I'm a bit disappointed that as soon as the NCAA tried to enforce that rule, the rule effectively got thrown away.
It's not the end of the world, but I think it's bad for the sport.
8
Posted on 3/2/24 at 9:59 am to DawginSC
quote:
The part of the NCAA lawsuit that I don't like isn't about the NCAA losing power. I simply believe that enforcing a prohibition on paying recruits to come to a school would be good for college football. I think it's a good rule that should be enforced strongly. I'm disappointed that pay for play is going to be how it works in college football going forward.
You sure didn't mind it when UGA was doing it under the table.
Posted on 3/2/24 at 9:59 am to DawginSC
quote:
I simply believe that enforcing a prohibition on paying recruits to come to a school would be good for college football. I think it's a good rule that should be enforced strongly. I'm disappointed that pay for play is going to be how it works in college football going forward.
Sounds like communist talk to me.
Posted on 3/2/24 at 10:15 am to DawginSC
Schools that stayed back in the NIL situation at the absolute beginning are learning more. No NIL deal will ever require going to a certain school, but they can require a certain amount of selective appearances that will make it hard to be at another school. They can even require living in an area. What good does it do MBOBR if Angel is driving her big body Benz somewhere outside of BR?
Posted on 3/2/24 at 10:32 am to DawginSC
quote:
The part of the NCAA lawsuit that I don't like isn't about the NCAA losing power. I simply believe that enforcing a prohibition on paying recruits to come to a school would be good for college football.
If UGA couldn’t pay players it wouldn’t have much of their roster. Walker was paid to attend UGA (1980 title and run) and Kirby is coaching a roster of paid players since he got to UGA. You don’t believe those recruiting classes are anything but bought do you? Pruitt half assed buying recruits that UGA paid full price for. Mimms was just one of dozens of bought and paid for recruits from those years.
fricking hypocrite.
Posted on 3/2/24 at 10:32 am to DawginSC
quote:
whatever organization runs college football could prevent any NIL contracts from having any conditions that effectively require a player to attend a particular college, I think it would fix 95% of the problems that exist with NIL.
It would fix it because boosters would no longer pay.
The only reason they are getting paid is to play football.
Posted on 3/2/24 at 11:33 am to DawginSC
quote:Please tell us how much less could you care?
I personally could care less if the NCAA exists or not.
Posted on 3/2/24 at 12:16 pm to DawginSC
Schools were doing pay for play long before the NIL started. With the ENIL is just out in the open now. You don’t think Nick Saban given away all those Dodge chargers which everybody seen all over the Internet was not paid for play?
Posted on 3/3/24 at 2:59 pm to DawginSC
quote:It will only be a matter of time before companies uses the teams as ways of advertising (like they ruined bowl games). Then the teams will matter even less. Recruits now just about pick schools on NIL money over anything. The Parading of players like Dart getting to use jets is just a taste of what is to come. Its like boosters on steroids. The companies will be controlling the game by pushing money around or threatening to take it away.
The part of the NCAA lawsuit that I don't like isn't about the NCAA losing power. I simply believe that enforcing a prohibition on paying recruits to come to a school would be good for college football. I think it's a good rule that should be enforced strongly. I'm disappointed that pay for play is going to be how it works in college football going forward.
The players will just follow money around and the companies will control the schools by giving them the money to pay for recruits. The NCAA will be irrelevant and take any deals the schools and companies offer to keep some power and help fund academics.
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 3:05 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News