Started By
Message

re: NCAA Can't Legally Punish Schools For NIL Deals During Recruiting Process

Posted on 2/9/24 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
8713 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

I have to honestly ask, if this NCAA/UT fiasco isn't a vendetta against UT, then what is it and why aren't more schools getting punished for doing the very same thing?


Because other schools weren’t complete fricking idiots like Tennessee. Because other collectives weren’t complete fricking idiots like Spyre, who bragged in a published article that they were going to use NIL funds to recruit players, which was and still is a recruiting violation. Because the two guys that started and run Spyre are Tennessee boosters. Because they, two boosters, paid for a recruit to make an unofficial visit before he had 1) signed an NIL agreement and 2) signed with Tennessee. Because those same boosters, by their own admission; were recruiting for Tennessee, which is against the rules, has been forever, and has nothing to do with NIL. That is why.

Tennessee fans should be mad at Hunter Baddour for running his mouth and publicly admitting that they were purposely flaunting recruiting rules. It reminds me of people that get on social media and brag about committing crimes and then act outraged when the police show up.

You would think that Tennessee would have been overly cautious after the Pruitt fiasco. But obviously they decided to take a different strategy and say “frick you NCAA, we will do whatever we want.”

It will be interesting to see how that works out for them.
Posted by Clawfense
Member since Oct 2019
20 posts
Posted on 2/9/24 at 4:59 pm to
I’m looking and I can’t find what the exact rule was on booster/NIL activities were….and this is important…at the time the trip happened. The NIL guidance from the NCAA has been a constantly changing mish-mash of unclear rules, guidance, and policies. Charlie Baker even said as such not even 3-months ago admitting there are no rules and was calling for national regulation. At the end of the day, any control the NCAA wants to put on it is in violation of the Sherman act.

As far as the lawsuit, it doesn’t look good for the NCAA. Their batting average in court is abysmal, and I doubt the AG of two states would sign on to a lawsuit that was a loser. Maybe I’m wrong, who knows.

We’ll see what happens, but I’m betting the NCAA loses this.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter