Started By
Message

re: Rank the OC’s under Saban

Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:11 am to
Posted by BigFolks6347
Alabama
Member since Sep 2022
1392 posts
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:11 am to
How do you have Rees over Locksley? Locksley had a high scoring offense and had his starters resting by the 2nd quarter in SEC play.
Posted by CrimsonCrusade
Member since Jan 2014
5163 posts
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:22 am to
I don't understand why Daboll is so high. He didn't do anything to develop Hurts and he noticeably regressed. I know it's thought that he wanted to play Tua, but as an NFL guy he should have been used to not getting that much control over the roster. When Hurts came back in the 2018 SECCG under Locksley, he looked massively improved again.

There's a reason Saban so easily let Daboll go.
Posted by TizzyT4theUofA
This side of eternity
Member since Jun 2016
10132 posts
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

How do you have Rees over Locksley? Locksley had a high scoring offense and had his starters resting by the 2nd quarter in SEC play.


Locksley was a one trick pony with 4 first round (and one Heisman) WRs, a top 5 pick at QB, a dominant OLine, and a stacked RB room. When we ran up against a team that could stop the RPO, we couldn’t adjust.

Rees doesn’t have anything even close to what we had in 2018. Our OLine was average to decent, our RBs were good not great, our QB is an athlete that can’t read a defense and throw the ball far but couldn’t hit a checkdown or crosser to save his life, our WRs almost always had someone open but the QB couldn’t process things fast enough to find them. Rees is 31 with 4 years experience as a play caller. Locks is 54 with almost 20 years of experience.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter