Started By
Message

re: Jayden Daniels

Posted on 1/8/24 at 9:58 pm to
Posted by Lush
Nola
Member since Jul 2023
503 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 9:58 pm to
Michigan would have run for 800 on LSU's defense.
Posted by SparkyDaHound
Member since Sep 2007
167 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 9:59 pm to
Would've been a high scoring game regardless.
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22426 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 9:59 pm to
No shite! He’s saying if JD was in Penix shoes
Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
6864 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Michigan would have run for 800 on LSU's defense.


And what does that have to do with the OP’s post??
Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10187 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Michigan would have run for 800 on LSU's defense


So you're saying it would have been close...
Posted by dukeg7213
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2023
3201 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Michigan would have run for 800 on LSU's defense.


That’s being nice
Posted by FootsFanatic
Member since Aug 2021
1161 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:03 pm to
800 yards on LSU....so very true.
Posted by RT58
Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
3676 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:05 pm to
Agreed
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

Michigan would have run for 800 on LSU's defense.

704 more than Texas A&M did.
Posted by Germantiger001
Southeast LA
Member since Jun 2016
843 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

Michigan would have run for 800 on LSU's defense.


True but we’d make adjustments at halftime and cut that number by 50% for the second half
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter