Started By
Message
re: A&M fans on twitter trying to say that Jimbo had a better first 3 years than Sark
Posted on 1/2/24 at 2:42 pm to Texas Gentleman
Posted on 1/2/24 at 2:42 pm to Texas Gentleman
quote:
statistically yes, Jimbo was a better coach.
"Sure Jimbo never came remotely close to winning a conference title or appearing in the CFP, but look at his dang TaxSlayer and Texas Bowl record! Money well spent if you ask me!"
If Jimbo was so much better than a CFP head coach, how come A&M spent $77 million to get rid of him?
1
Posted on 1/2/24 at 3:36 pm to Shea Vinnerbush
quote:
Sure Jimbo never came remotely close to winning a conference title or appearing in the CFP
Being ranked number 5 in 2020 and the first team out of the playoff isnt "remotely close"... interesting definition on the word close.
quote:
If Jimbo was so much better than a CFP head coach, how come A&M spent $77 million to get rid of him
Jimbo is not currently a better coach, nowhere did I say that or does that graphic imply it. Only, that statistically he had more wins/better winning percentage, won more bowl games, and had top 10 wins in his first 3 years than Sark. Thats all.
Nobody knows what the future will hold, but we are only talking the first 3 years because that is Sark's current tenure. But once again, Im not shocked whoever came up with that is rustling so many jimmies online, I'm sure they knew it would get longhorn fans riled up after their loss.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News