Started By
Message

re: A&M fans on twitter trying to say that Jimbo had a better first 3 years than Sark

Posted on 1/2/24 at 2:42 pm to
Posted by Shea Vinnerbush
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2023
2162 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

statistically yes, Jimbo was a better coach.


"Sure Jimbo never came remotely close to winning a conference title or appearing in the CFP, but look at his dang TaxSlayer and Texas Bowl record! Money well spent if you ask me!"

If Jimbo was so much better than a CFP head coach, how come A&M spent $77 million to get rid of him?
Posted by Texas Gentleman
Texas
Member since Sep 2015
2646 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Sure Jimbo never came remotely close to winning a conference title or appearing in the CFP


Being ranked number 5 in 2020 and the first team out of the playoff isnt "remotely close"... interesting definition on the word close.

quote:

If Jimbo was so much better than a CFP head coach, how come A&M spent $77 million to get rid of him

Jimbo is not currently a better coach, nowhere did I say that or does that graphic imply it. Only, that statistically he had more wins/better winning percentage, won more bowl games, and had top 10 wins in his first 3 years than Sark. Thats all.

Nobody knows what the future will hold, but we are only talking the first 3 years because that is Sark's current tenure. But once again, Im not shocked whoever came up with that is rustling so many jimmies online, I'm sure they knew it would get longhorn fans riled up after their loss.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter