Started By
Message
re: Setting the record straight - Stoops got rejected
Posted on 11/27/23 at 11:42 pm to ManBearSharkReb
Posted on 11/27/23 at 11:42 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
Y’all rejected to stoops for a less experienced stoops?
No one really seems to understand why their fanbase hated the Stoops "hire" but embraces Elko.
The biggest benefit is that Elko is cheaper but we are constantly told that money isn't an issue.
3
Posted on 11/27/23 at 11:45 pm to SidewalkTiger
Bc he’s a Stoops! lol too much bad blood with that family. Plus, that family is OU royalty. It’s an odd fit.
Posted on 11/27/23 at 11:47 pm to SidewalkTiger
Not that you will genuinely listen to the explanations given, but just for shits and giggles:
Obviously Stoops is highly respected by the A&M leadership because he was one of the final candidates. Anyone can see that.
Elko was just preferred at the end of the day.
Obviously Stoops is highly respected by the A&M leadership because he was one of the final candidates. Anyone can see that.
Elko was just preferred at the end of the day.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 12:42 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
No one really seems to understand why their fanbase hated the Stoops "hire" but embraces Elko.
The biggest benefit is that Elko is cheaper but we are constantly told that money isn't an issue.
Not only that if you look at what do Stoops have advantage over Elko?
More Experience.
Been in the SEC long time.
Elko
knows Texas A&M staff and players.
Knows HS coaches in Texas. This is huge!
More comfortable with the school.
Plus, cheaper and by far better chance to succeed over Stoop because Stoops hasn't been around Texas HS coaches.
I say Texas A&M made the right choice to hire Elko.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News