Started By
Message

re: If Mizzou does not get the Cotton Bowl…what is their landing spot?

Posted on 11/27/23 at 10:01 pm to
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
23229 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 10:01 pm to
I agree about FSU and the PAC really but it’s not really fair to put teams in based on a power ranking when they have played a full season and you can take head to head games into account imo. I think Bama is better than Wash Oregon FSU and even probably Texas but again, should we put teams in based on power ranking or the seasons result. I prefer the latter. It’s unlikely Bama will win anyway though
Posted by momentoftruth87
DeSantis Country
Member since Oct 2013
73436 posts
Posted on 11/27/23 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

should we put teams in based on power ranking or the seasons result


That was supposed to be the whole point of the committee.

I’m also one of the few people on here that isn’t SEC biased. Just saying how I see it.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20588 posts
Posted on 11/28/23 at 6:09 am to
quote:

I think Bama is better than Wash Oregon FSU and even probably Texas but again, should we put teams in based on power ranking or the seasons result. I prefer the latter.
I remember the year Miami and Fla State both had 1 loss, and the controversy of who plays for #1 in the bowl.

I remember the circular logic= I believe Fla State won that game, but because they were 'the better loss', Miami got the vote.

I can see them doing that to justify Alabama jumping Texas. I thought that's why we went to the BCS, to be honest- to get away from crap like that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter