Started By
Message

re: New talking point - Chancellor wouldn't let HY fire Pittman

Posted on 11/25/23 at 6:52 pm to
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
27387 posts
Posted on 11/25/23 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

The Chancellor is supposedly very fiscally conservative. Which makes sense, but then again it also does not, since you are going to crater your biggest money generator into ashes by retaining Mr 'I don't know.'


Chancellors don't know shite about running a business and they don't know shite about football. Neither do the people in the athletic department, but I digress. This whole situation is fricked. If HY had any balls, he'd have fired Pittman's arse, told the chancellor to frick off and had the big money lined up behind him with a plan in place.
Posted by dammitbert
Member since Aug 2016
629 posts
Posted on 11/25/23 at 7:04 pm to
Calling out that stupid fricking extension and buyout sounds like a boss holding an AD accountable.

But it's not like HY did that all by himself.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter