Started By
Message

re: Is there a consensus #2 football program in the SEC, historically?

Posted on 7/11/23 at 10:26 am to
Posted by Bama Bird
Member since Dec 2011
Member since Mar 2013
19187 posts
Posted on 7/11/23 at 10:26 am to
10 years ago, it was Tennessee without question. Right now, it's a discussion between Tennessee/Georgia/LSU

Next year, #2 is Oklahoma
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
14605 posts
Posted on 7/11/23 at 10:37 am to
quote:

10 years ago, it was Tennessee without question. Right now, it's a discussion between Tennessee/Georgia/LSU

Next year, #2 is Oklahoma



Nationally, Oklahoma can make the claim with NCs. But it would seem that SEC success has a lot to do with SEC championships as well. The Sooners won't be bringing their conference championships with them.
Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
3153 posts
Posted on 7/11/23 at 11:57 am to
Gtfo. 20+ years ago, maybe.
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
73180 posts
Posted on 7/11/23 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Next year, #2 is Oklahoma


Nope. You don’t earn it by playing patsies all season long. I would have Georgia, LSU and Tennessee in a dead heat. The case could be made for all three. It pains me to say it but Georgia has the upper hand right now.
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 12:48 pm
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36748 posts
Posted on 7/11/23 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Next year, #2 is Oklahoma


Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 7/11/23 at 12:55 pm to
Tennessee hasn’t won the sec in 25 years
Posted by Oklahomey
Bucksnort, TN
Member since Mar 2013
5090 posts
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:09 pm to
Oklahoma and Texas will be absent from rankings until they can win a national championship while members of the SEC. Sooners are an automatic #2 in the SEC when that happens. Nationally it’s obvious OU is top five. Conference-wise, OU is unranked.
Posted by Stoffel
Member since Jul 2023
88 posts
Posted on 7/14/23 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

it's a discussion between Tennessee/Georgia/LSU


Thats is fine if you look at raw data. But if you really want to do a deep dive and get real about the data, you have to include Auburn.

Here is why:

AL.com did a deep dive several years ago that included the winning percentage of the opponents of every SEC team.

AU has played the toughest schedule of any SEC team over the entire history of the SEC BY FAR. It is not even close. AU's historical strength of schedule vs any other SEC team is so far beyond any other SEC team to make it essentailly incomparable.

It is pretty impossible to quantify what an average SEC schedule would have meant in terms of wins , losses and championships for AU, but I suspect it would put AU right there with a legit arguement as the second best program in SEC history.

AU's traditional rivals were Bama, UGA, FL, and Tenn. And AU has played LSU a lot and AU played Vandy regularly when Vandy was one of the best teams in the SEC along with Geogia Tech.

The AL.com analysis which simply compiled the win loss schedule of SEC opponents for all SEC teams was pretty mind blowing. I do not remember the excact rankings, but AU was in a different universe, Bama was last or second to last (I know Bama can't play Bama) and LSU was in the middle. Don't remeber where UGA or UT shook out.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter