Stoffel

A'ight baws. I've about wasted enough time dicking around here. I'll try to come back tomorrow and anyone who wants to have a legit discussion can pick any of the major topics I listed, start a topic and even put "Stoffel" in it and when I'm back I'll be happy to engage and discuss whatever it is.

More name calling. Not surprised.

You want to engage in a legit discussion?

Do you have the balls? Do you have the intellect?

I'm not saying you don't. I just like to know what I'm dealing with.

quote:

---

debt/deficit: Too high due to spending
Immigration reform: define "reform". Enforce the law, get rid of birthright and chain migration.
Inflation: Still too high - thanks Joe!
Concentration of wealth: not a concern of mine other than govt has too much.
Tax rates: Flat or fair tax.
SS - unConstitutional but not going away. Give younger generations option of opting out.
Medicate/Medicaid: unConstitutional but not going away. Example of less than stellar govt performance.
US incarceration rates: a reflection of cultures
Interest rates: maybe a little high yet.
Voting rights: go back to 1 day, mail-in by request. ID required.
and so on....

---

Too many half sentence fragments on complex issues. But I will just respond to the first one (and one more if you want to pick one for me to address).

Debt/deficit and this will be brief but I could write a 50 page discertation on this.

Too high due to spending is a worthless critique.

Let's talk discressionary spending ve entitlements. And interest on the debt. And spending that generates economic growth or not. And corporate and individual tax rates. And global tax rates. And repatriation of earnings. And corporate inversions. And treaty shopping. And supply side economics. And the Laffer curve. AND....

If you do not understand the debt to GDP ratio (which is all that really matters) I suggest you understand it before engaging me.

I have a follow up question for the OP too.

Here are two FACTS:

1. We have zero evidence of a single $1 being paid to either Biden relating to ANY bribe.

2. Donald J Trump received $6.5 million from China in 2017 right after he was elected president. Donald J Trump has no active businesses in China.

I am POSITIVE OP is outraged about the known payment to Trump from an unknown source in China and believe it should be investigated.

Right? :dunno:

You start one. I told you to pick.

Dealer's choice. Pick a topic and give me a detailed explantion of your opinion on said topic and we will discuss it.

Try me. Say something and state your view on a relevant issue and let's do it.

I gave you a long list to chose from. Pick one and lets get after it and discuss.

Why? Is this board hopeless and a waste of time as to any intelligent discussion?

I have noticed no one refutes anything I post, mostly just a bunch of name calling.

I've also noticed there is ZERO discussion of any actual issues.

Like the debt/deficit. Immigration reform possibilities. Inflation (which has dropped like 11 months in a row). Concentration of wealth. Tax rates. Health care proposals. Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid reform. U.S. incaceration rates. The lack of foreign immigrants to do the jobs Americans will not. Interest rates. Voting rights. And so on.

To be honest, this board seems to be the most free of any actual discussion of anything that actually matters that I have ever scene.

So maybe I should leave and leave everyone to the name calling and Hunter dick pics. Thank you for the advice either way. :cheers:

Best guess is when there is eveidence he broke a law. Any law.

That is not very likely so best guess is NEVER :nana: :usa:

No. Maybe you can help out the OP with my request for enlightnement and specifics?

Or maybe you cannot because they don't exist.

I am starting to think this board is all sound, fury, outrage and victimhood with no actual knowledge or evidence to back up ANYTHING.

quote:

---

The entire Trump family would be under the jail for what's on that laptop and what's been testified to by IRS and FBI about the Bidens' Ukraine and China bribes.

---

Enlighten me as to the crimes committed on the laptop with eveidence to back them up.

And as to the IRS testimony, I watched that too. MAybe you did not realize but the entire IRS case involved around a few hundred thousand of personal expenses taken as business expenses.

You do realize every self emplyed person who files a tax return inflates their business costs, correct? And I agree Hunter should pay a price for doing so.

But it was a few hundred thousand. You do realize Trump did essentailly the same things for decades except his was for a few hundred million and he is going to trial where he may have to pay over $700 million this fall.

I assume you are 1,000 more times outraged about Trump's tax schemes than Hunter's correct?