re: Josh Pate: Jamaal Jarrett Story is an “embarrassment” to the AJC

quote:

---

What? As you said, you didn’t watch the videos.

---

I didn't watch both. He spent far too much time telling me nothing beyond a dressed up version of 'theyz biased against us Pawl!111!' to invest more time watching him say the same thing again. This is particularly true when he implies everything is nothing while ignoring that of the two cases the LB no one's heard of is awaiting trial. Clearly there's something but directing everything at one case that he (and others) in turn dispute as nothing is a nifty way of misdirecting and claiming there's nothing whatsoever to anything.

quote:

---

His “facts” are that the actual article doesn’t have facts to match the headline.

---

So Jamal didn't break curfew, didn't drink and didn't wind up being interviewed by police and UGA didn't rally behind him? THAT is what the headline (and first portion of the article) says.


As for the facts, post them. Post links. And if you're Pate - lay them out. Simply saying 'it's nothing' isn't an argument. It's a dismissal and only those who are already prone to buy it are going to buy that as an answer.