Started By
Message
re: Kirk Saarloos
Posted on 6/21/23 at 2:24 pm to BigBro
Posted on 6/21/23 at 2:24 pm to BigBro
I want him after we shitcan Pierce, whenever that may be.
1. Sully - Long, long shot but make him say no
2. Saarloos - Remind TCU who they are
3. Vitello - Unrefined greaseball but he will eventually find success
1. Sully - Long, long shot but make him say no
2. Saarloos - Remind TCU who they are
3. Vitello - Unrefined greaseball but he will eventually find success
Posted on 6/21/23 at 2:30 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
quote:I wouldn't get your hopes up, then.
I want him after we shitcan Pierce, whenever that may be
I'm far from a Pierce defender, but you can't deny that he undoubtedly over-achieved this season given what was returning on this team.
Won the conference 3 of the past 5 full seasons. He's 7-4 in super regional games (advanced in 3/4) and 14-2 in regional games (advanced in 4/5). We expect better performance in Omaha, sure, but as this year has shown, it's tough for every team there. Two of the five Top 8 seeds that made it to Omaha went a collective 0-4
I'd say let the guy do what he can with next year's returning players before going full pitchfork and torch on him.
Posted on 6/21/23 at 2:33 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
quote:
1. Sully - Long, long shot but make him say no 2. Saarloos - Remind TCU who they are 3. Vitello - Unrefined greaseball but he will eventually find success
That’s a good list. Vitello is a schmuck, but I think I would like him more as my coach. He clearly knows how to recruit.
Summer of 2025, we will be looking
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News