Started By
Message

re: Great video of all the holds Ohio State committed vs. UGA, but not called by officials

Posted on 1/23/23 at 2:34 pm to
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23152 posts
Posted on 1/23/23 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Some bucks still claim it was targeting


I don't think it was targeting, but I think it could have been called unnecessary roughness. Not sure if they have to call that with the targeting call originally or if they can say well we pulled the targeting but let's put in unnecessary roughness
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33151 posts
Posted on 1/23/23 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

I think it could have been called unnecessary roughness


Not on a clean hit In a guy trying to catch a td
Posted by bunkerhill
Georgia
Member since Oct 2017
1371 posts
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:30 pm to
Some of your fellow sucknuts have complained about the first down by Bowers and of course the "targeting" in the endzone.
Of course if it was not targeting it should be a personal foul per the sucknuts. Georgia bought off the officials is another one floating around the internet.

As a fanbase the sucknuts do not have a good grasp of the rules in college football. I gave that fanbase more credit than that. I remember when they complained about the loss to Clemson and how the SEC officials screwed over the sucknuts. Someone had a recap of the penalties against Ohio State in that game and when you looked at the calls there was only one call that was half way controversial. I saw that game and could not figure why the sucknut fans were all complaining about the officiating. They don't understand the rules of the game.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter