Started By
Message
re: Tennessee: 1 national championship in the last 70-something years
Posted on 1/6/23 at 3:02 pm to Sgt Tuffnuts
Posted on 1/6/23 at 3:02 pm to Sgt Tuffnuts
I wish the OP would specify which sport. Because i could swear the baseVols won it all last year
Posted on 1/6/23 at 4:51 pm to VolNavy98
quote:
You can suck a fat baby Dick bitch.
That seems angry and harsh. Are you ok ?
Posted on 1/6/23 at 5:07 pm to VolNavy98
quote:
But still have the 2nd most national titles in the SEC, 3rd most conference titles, and 2nd highest winning percentage in the SEC. You can suck a fat baby Dick bitch.
Yes bc everyone cares about your natties from 70+ years ago lmao
Posted on 1/6/23 at 5:11 pm to VolNavy98
quote:
Laugh all you want. Still don’t change the facts that UT sits #2 in National Titles among SEC teams. And has the #2 best winning % of all SEC teams. Those are facts.
With stats like those you must own the head to head over the Dawgs too right?
Posted on 1/6/23 at 5:12 pm to FireDanMullen
quote:
Yes bc everyone cares about your natties from 70+ years ago lmao
For football, how far back would you go for relevant national championships?
Posted on 1/6/23 at 5:54 pm to VolNavy98
quote:
But still have the 2nd most national titles in the SEC
Most of your title claims are absolute horseshite. Losing bowl games, finishing ranked 4th, etc. Just nonsense.
If everyone played the same goober game you play with "claimed" titles we'd all have several more.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 6:11 pm to VolNavy98
quote:
Still don’t change the facts that UT sits #2 in National Titles among SEC teams.
Claiming retroactive computer “titles” is pathetic. It isn’t a fact, it’s what your school decided to claim in the mid 2000s decades after the seasons happened. 4 of those “titles” are, quite literally, from computer algorithms and polls that didn’t exist when the seasons were played. And y’all complain about the titles Alabama claims
This post was edited on 1/7/23 at 10:55 am
Posted on 1/6/23 at 6:47 pm to Sgt Tuffnuts
1950, 1951, 1967, 1998
4 in 73 years. You fricking suck at this stuff.
4 in 73 years. You fricking suck at this stuff.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 6:49 pm to BigOrangeKen
quote:
Hopefully in the next 2 to 3 years we get a shot at 1.
Good one
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:05 pm to Prof
Dude they care 10x more about us than they do tcu all the while saying were irrelevant. Its bizarre. Theyre literally on the cusp of potential back to back national titles and theyre sitting around listening to erik ainge's radio show... Whom i didnt even know had a radio show. I think they're paying to listen to it lol.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:43 pm to VolNavy98
And LSU had the checkerboard end zones over 30 years before Tennessee
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:46 pm to Sgt Tuffnuts
You're doing the Lord's work
Posted on 1/6/23 at 8:01 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
You're doing the Lord's work
The lord knows the difference between 1 and 4 unlike the idiot OP
Posted on 1/6/23 at 8:02 pm to Smokeyone
[quote]LINK ]
Ah, the good ol' Likenhous poll of 1967...
"While USC and Oklahoma were voted as the top ranked team in some of the postseason polls, there were voters that took into account Tennessee’s success against a tough schedule. The publication Litkenhous, which specialized in sports rankings named the Vols the national champions of the 1967 season."
Ah, the good ol' Likenhous poll of 1967...
"While USC and Oklahoma were voted as the top ranked team in some of the postseason polls, there were voters that took into account Tennessee’s success against a tough schedule. The publication Litkenhous, which specialized in sports rankings named the Vols the national champions of the 1967 season."
Posted on 1/6/23 at 8:11 pm to Sgt Tuffnuts
quote:
Ah, the good ol' Likenhous poll of 1967... "While USC and Oklahoma were voted as the top ranked team in some of the postseason polls, there were voters that took into account Tennessee’s success against a tough schedule. The publication Litkenhous, which specialized in sports rankings named the Vols the national champions of the 1967 season."
And 50/51 still make at worst 3. And 67 is more legit than half of Bamas. So at best you are too stupid to count to 3, worst case you can’t count to 4. Either way you are stilll an idiot.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 8:36 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
And 50/51 still make at worst 3. And 67 is more legit than half of Bamas. So at best you are too stupid to count to 3, worst case you can’t count to 4. Either way you are stilll an idiot.
Please tell us all about the 1953 national title claim and how that came to be. Fascinating!
Posted on 1/6/23 at 9:01 pm to SouthernInsanity
quote:
For football, how far back would you go for relevant national championships?
Look, I appreciate the pageantry and history of the game and appreciate what happened years and years ago to pave the way for the game.
However, when you bring it up in to make a relevant discussion about being a powerhouse today? I’m going to check you — and I don’t think titles from 75 years ago should be thrown around to make a point about today.
I’d say from 1970s onward I hold in a more legit light because of; racial integration, implementation of weight lifting in the sport making better athletes, and the development of more sophisticated passing games and offensive and defenses in general.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 9:15 pm to FireDanMullen
quote:
Look, I appreciate the pageantry and history of the game and appreciate what happened years and years ago to pave the way for the game.
However, when you bring it up in to make a relevant discussion about being a powerhouse today? I’m going to check you — and I don’t think titles from 75 years ago should be thrown around to make a point about today.
I’d say from 1970s onward I hold in a more legit light because of; racial integration, implementation of weight lifting in the sport making better athletes, and the development of more sophisticated passing games and offensive and defenses in general.
The 70s werent 75 years ago.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News