Started By
Message
re: Can we talk about the 1H fumble situation in LSU-Bama?
Posted on 11/8/22 at 11:43 am to Damone
Posted on 11/8/22 at 11:43 am to Damone
If the officials thought LSU really had possession prior to the oob touch, they would have awarded to LSU. No single frame photo would show different either. Was what it was.
3
Posted on 11/8/22 at 12:03 pm to TroyTider
Except that on the field it WAS ruled a fumble and LSU recovery. So to some other's point, there needed to be indisputable evidence that LSU did not "fully possess" the ball prior to AL's touch. So some people, myself included, now understand the letter of the rule; but, my opinion is that we did indeed have "full possession" and it should have been LSU ball.
This post was edited on 11/8/22 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 11/9/22 at 3:14 pm to TroyTider
quote:
If the officials thought LSU really had possession prior to the oob touch, they would have awarded to LSU. No single frame photo would show different either. Was what it was.
Reasonable minds can differ on whether he had possession when the Bama player touched the ball, they called it a fumble/recovery on the field. How can you say there is indisputable evidence that the LSU player didn't have possession??
Posted on 11/9/22 at 6:25 pm to TroyTider
Please get the frick out of this convo this is for real football programs 
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News