Started By
Message

re: So when ND joins the B1G, the B1G will have more blue bloods than the SEC

Posted on 8/23/22 at 8:55 pm to
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11349 posts
Posted on 8/23/22 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

Doesn't matter they've made up 54% of all titles.

Yes they dominated the pre integration era pretty thoroughly.

Of course that was almost 60 years ago.

Bama has won more NC since 1960 than your entire conference combined and most of those were by a team (Nebraska) who wasn’t even a member yet and hasn’t won anything since 1995.

In the last 15 years the B10 has one title compared to the SEC with 11.

Maybe it’s best not to come around here barking about blue bloods when all of yours outside of Ohio State are retired at this point?
Posted by Lord Asano
Member since Dec 2021
237 posts
Posted on 8/23/22 at 8:57 pm to
Blue blood means royalty. Its old money, and had you not got texas and OU, you'd be the only duck standing. The majority of the SEC is johnny come lately.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30514 posts
Posted on 8/24/22 at 7:15 am to
Michigan a blue blood? They are a Longhorns level underachiever every year.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter