Started By
Message
re: So when ND joins the B1G, the B1G will have more blue bloods than the SEC
Posted on 8/23/22 at 8:55 pm to Lord Asano
Posted on 8/23/22 at 8:55 pm to Lord Asano
quote:
Doesn't matter they've made up 54% of all titles.
Yes they dominated the pre integration era pretty thoroughly.
Of course that was almost 60 years ago.
Bama has won more NC since 1960 than your entire conference combined and most of those were by a team (Nebraska) who wasn’t even a member yet and hasn’t won anything since 1995.
In the last 15 years the B10 has one title compared to the SEC with 11.
Maybe it’s best not to come around here barking about blue bloods when all of yours outside of Ohio State are retired at this point?
Posted on 8/23/22 at 8:57 pm to tide06
Blue blood means royalty. Its old money, and had you not got texas and OU, you'd be the only duck standing. The majority of the SEC is johnny come lately.
Posted on 8/24/22 at 7:15 am to tide06
Michigan a blue blood? They are a Longhorns level underachiever every year.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)