Started By
Message

Is LSU always one year away?
Posted on 8/20/12 at 11:50 pm
Posted on 8/20/12 at 11:50 pm
In 2010 LSU was building for 2011. Last year they had what most objective people would call one of the greatest teams ever until 1/9. However, all was not lost on 1/9 because the 2012 team was supposed to be even better. But now with losing the best player on the team/main game changer (HB) and starting a rookie QB (who has looked an awful lot like a rookie to this point - lots of ints in practice), is 2013 the year now?
Posted on 8/20/12 at 11:51 pm to Garfield
Kind of like how Auburn is always "young."
Posted on 8/20/12 at 11:54 pm to Garfield
2012 edition may well be much better 2011. The 2013 club, I suspect, may be the one that is not one of the faavorites for ATL/BCS...not saying a 8-4 step back just saying not one the favorites. I have a feeling we will be losing a whole lot of guys after 2012.
======================
Though we do have alot of young talent that will play this year...who knows, club may be pretty good for awhile.
======================
Though we do have alot of young talent that will play this year...who knows, club may be pretty good for awhile.
This post was edited on 8/21/12 at 12:03 am
Posted on 8/20/12 at 11:54 pm to mwlewis
Auburn was pretty damn young last year.
Posted on 8/20/12 at 11:56 pm to mwlewis
We should overall be a bit better this year. You are never guaranteed anything.
Posted on 8/20/12 at 11:56 pm to Garfield
Will UT ever return to prominence?
Posted on 8/20/12 at 11:56 pm to Garfield
I think back to back 12 wins seasons should be considered pretty great. We should be able to achieve that this year.
I know 1/9 sucked for us but only one team can win a year and I think a lot of our fans forget that fact.
I know 1/9 sucked for us but only one team can win a year and I think a lot of our fans forget that fact.
Posted on 8/20/12 at 11:58 pm to BigHeadTigerFan
quote:
GFY
I agree those were pretty good teams (although the first didn't play the unanimous #1 team in the county and the second lost to Arky and Kentucky) but it just seems like since then LSU has always had good teams that were just one year away from being special.
Posted on 8/20/12 at 11:59 pm to Garfield
Nice flame, would read again.
Posted on 8/21/12 at 12:00 am to LaBornNRaised
Have a decent shot at a 3 year 36-4, 38-3 mark.
Posted on 8/21/12 at 12:04 am to Garfield
quote:
In 2010 LSU was building for 2011. Last year they had what most objective people would call one of the greatest teams ever until 1/9. However, all was not lost on 1/9 because the 2012 team was supposed to be even better. But now with losing the best player on the team/main game changer (HB) and starting a rookie QB (who has looked an awful lot like a rookie to this point - lots of ints in practice), is 2013 the year now?
Starting pre 2011 season I have always said 2011 was bama's year to win it and 2012 was LSU's year. Go check my post history. I think last years team took everybody by surprise and I contribute a lot of the success to preparing for Oregon to start the year.
do you mean the practice where mett threw 2 ints but threw for 5 tds?
This post was edited on 8/21/12 at 12:05 am
Posted on 8/21/12 at 12:08 am to Garfield
quote:
Garfield
Recent Threads:
1. LSU returns better team - how could they lose in Nov? (Posted on 6/21/12 at 12:29 a.m)
2. A.J. says Mett is Crazy (Posted on 7/20/12 at 5:34 p.m.)
3. Mett Starts in NO last year - LSU Dynasty? (Posted on 7/9/12 at 11:52 p.m.)
4. LSU fans - would you switch QB's with Bama? (Posted on 6/28/12 at 11:07 p.m.)
This was his first four pages of post material in his recent posts. Guy is awesome.
Posted on 8/21/12 at 12:11 am to mwlewis
quote:
Kind of like how Auburn is always "young."
Where is this coming from? I believe the only two years Auburn has claimed to be young was last year and this year which in both cases are true. Just look at the numbers.
Posted on 8/21/12 at 12:11 am to Tiger Authority
Mettsessed
nB4:Rival
nB4:Rival
Posted on 8/21/12 at 12:21 am to Tiger Authority
quote:
Guy is awesome.
Thank you. I haven't researched your post history, but you seem like a great guy too.
Not sure why any of my 4 post are bad - they are all legit questions/statements if your read the full post and all lead to fairly good conversations.
Posted on 8/21/12 at 12:26 am to Garfield
Just an odd trend when your 100 or so posts on this board are so slanted in favor of LSU threads such as these.
Back to top
