Started By
Message
re: the OFFICIAL HarsinGate thread (Harsin Refusing reduced buyout)
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:37 pm to Poker Dough
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:37 pm to Poker Dough
quote:In Section 20 of Bryan Harsin’s contract, it allows for termination "for cause" for failure to comply with University rule/policy. Section 26 requires a 30-day written notice for breach.-- Hoke
When do you reckon it gets announced?
He's got 30 days. The only question is when did those 30 days start.. Yesterday? Last week?
2
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:38 pm to Poker Dough
But let’s be real, any company would fire you if you refused to participate in an HR investigation.
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:38 pm to Skyler97
No.
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:38 pm to TheJones
Not unless there's same vague language that would make it possible to slide it in?
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:38 pm to AU_251
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:38 pm to TheJones
Mind blown if this is seriously how this goes down. I'm just talking out my arse.
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:39 pm to jt33
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:39 pm to jt33
30 days to do what?
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:40 pm to Poker Dough
quote:
Not unless there's same vague language that would make it possible to slide it in?
I think this policy helps them chip away at other AD employees that don’t have a mega buyout in the balance. I don’t think this is aimed directly toward Harsin
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:41 pm to TheJones
One thing that isn't clear to me. If you look at the document it says it was "modified" yesterday. That could mean it was implemented/uploaded yesterday.. but that also seems like it could have always been there and some small changes we're made to it yesterday. I'm not clear on that.
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:42 pm to jt33
OP should make this the OFFICIAL HarsinGate thread
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:42 pm to TheJones
Maybe his assistants? Harsin would cooperate to try and save his buyout and/or job right?
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:42 pm to jt33
Thank god for keystroke memories
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:42 pm to TheJones
Cliffs?
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:42 pm to warcry
quote:
But let’s be real, any company would fire you if you refused to participate in an HR investigation.
I mean, depends on your definition of refusing to cooperate. We don’t know what’s been asked of him. Is staying in your vacation that had been scheduled for likely a while refusing to participate? Idk but there are definitely levels to it
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:46 pm to Poker Dough
quote:
Maybe his assistants? Harsin would cooperate to try and save his buyout and/or job right?
This is just hypothetical. But let’s say they’re investigating cause and have interest in asking questions to even employees like trainers, analysts, or any of the hundreds of people employed around the football program. Having a policy in place to point to helps them in that regard.
I don’t know that they’re doing that. I’m just guessing this policy would be more helpful for that than coaches with contracts
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:46 pm to Skyler97
quote:Well he has 30 days to comply and he's back in town now so even if that was the reason, that excuse is gone now.
I mean, depends on your definition of refusing to cooperate. We don’t know what’s been asked of him. Is staying in your vacation that had been scheduled for likely a while refusing to participate? Idk but there are definitely levels to it
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:46 pm to Skyler97
I think we are being played. If you’re gonna fire him, then fricking do it. It’s imminent right? This to me is just the next round of rumor mongering to try and gain some sort of leverage. It’s so fricking childish honestly
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:47 pm to jt33
Per Sauces. Harsin isn't back in town yet.
Posted on 2/9/22 at 5:53 pm to DutchValleyTiger
Per one sauce, all I got was a "it's happening tonight" text.
If it happens tonight, then hey, call me an insider.
If it happens tonight, then hey, call me an insider.
Page 27 of 57
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News