Started By
Message
re: Muschamp is the new Auburn DC.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:25 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:25 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
I firmly believe all those cocks have prematurely fapped over false information. That is all I can say, I may have said too much as it is.
Rocky's sources are the best in the biz.
0
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:26 pm to piggidyphish
I can't speak to the USC insider being credible, but I sure as hell can't confirm the Auburn insider either.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:28 pm to piggidyphish
quote:
I love bullshite. I fall for it every year.
every.fricking.time.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:32 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:Wall of text, I know, but JC Shurburtt posted this on South Carolina's message board. Apparently he is a mod there. I don't know. On my phone so it's hard to break up the huge paragraph.
JC Shurburtt 49099 posts 61 seconds ago via Mobile Premium Post Here's what I've got... -Auburn feels very good about its chances to land Will Muschamp. Folks on both sides believe it's a strong possibility that he ends up back on the plains. -I confirmed that Muschamp and his wife liked living in Auburn when they were there and would not mind moving back. -Sources cautioned it was "not done" but that Auburn was running in the top spot for Muschamp's services. -His salary could be $2 million plus at Auburn, which is prepared to make him the highest paid coordinator in college football by a mile. -I have heard Muschamp and his family have a strong preference to remain in the South. ***It is important to note everything above is predicated on each school offering more or less the same deal, which is come take our money and hire your staff and run our defense for us*** South Carolina in that scenario (DC job only) would be a distant fourth behind Auburn, NFL and Texas A&M. The reason outside of money, familiarity and a more successful program at AU (more prestige to set him up for the next head coaching gig)- the concern that it could be a one-and-done thing and then Spurrier hits the beach and Muschamp moves again. But... This notion of a Head Coach In-Waiting tag could change things dramatically. This means that it does not matter if it is a one-year deal or not. One year just means Muschamp is a head coach in the SEC after one season and then he's back. So the key here is this- regardless if it is spoken, unspoken or how they word or phrase it- is some sort of transition plan involving Will Muschamp replacing Steve Spurrier, whenever that may be. We have not been able to have anyone give us a straight answer on if a HCIW title (or at least some sort of agreement) was going to be part of the deal. Some say yes, some say no. The people who would definitely know are not talking now and one of them is heading to the Dominican Republic tonight on a plane. In conclusion... -If the Gamecocks put a HCIW offer on the table, they are likely to get Muschamp. -If not, he will go to Auburn (most likely) or the NFL or could even take a year off. The key lies in what exactly the Gamecocks are offering. That's a huge deal because you are talking about hiring a head coach essentially. We should know more in the coming days or at least by next week. Stay tuned. Posted from Rivals Mobile
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:35 pm to TTsTowel
Thanks for that info, TT. That made the hole of my butt pucker.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:36 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
JC Shurburtt
Here's what I've got...
-Auburn feels very good about its chances to land Will Muschamp. Folks on both sides believe it's a strong possibility that he ends up back on the plains.
-I confirmed that Muschamp and his wife liked living in Auburn when they were there and would not mind moving back.
-Sources cautioned it was "not done" but that Auburn was running in the top spot for Muschamp's services.
-His salary could be $2 million plus at Auburn, which is prepared to make him the highest paid coordinator in college football by a mile.
-I have heard Muschamp and his family have a strong preference to remain in the South.
***It is important to note everything above is predicated on each school offering more or less the same deal, which is come take our money and hire your staff and run our defense for us***
South Carolina in that scenario (DC job only) would be a distant fourth behind Auburn, NFL and Texas A&M.
The reason outside of money, familiarity and a more successful program at AU (more prestige to set him up for the next head coaching gig)- the concern that it could be a one-and-done thing and then Spurrier hits the beach and Muschamp moves again.
But...
This notion of a Head Coach In-Waiting tag could change things dramatically. This means that it does not matter if it is a one-year deal or not. One year just means Muschamp is a head coach in the SEC after one season and then he's back.
So the key here is this- regardless if it is spoken, unspoken or how they word or phrase it- is some sort of transition plan involving Will Muschamp replacing Steve Spurrier, whenever that may be.
We have not been able to have anyone give us a straight answer on if a HCIW title (or at least some sort of agreement) was going to be part of the deal. Some say yes, some say no. The people who would definitely know are not talking now and one of them is heading to the Dominican Republic tonight on a plane.
In conclusion...
-If the Gamecocks put a HCIW offer on the table, they are likely to get Muschamp.
-If not, he will go to Auburn (most likely) or the NFL or could even take a year off.
The key lies in what exactly the Gamecocks are offering. That's a huge deal because you are talking about hiring a head coach essentially.
We should know more in the coming days or at least by next week.
Stay tuned.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:36 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
-His salary could be $2 million plus at Auburn, which is prepared to make him the highest paid coordinator in college football by a mile.
Holy crap.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:37 pm to TTsTowel
Just a reminder in case anyone missed this post I made, 5 minutes ago.
Thanks Nortizzle for the gif
quote:
I firmly believe all those cocks have prematurely fapped over false information.
Thanks Nortizzle for the gif
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:37 pm to TTsTowel
That fricking sucks.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:38 pm to Weagle25
quote:
Holy crap.
Shoot, at that point we oughta just make him Head Coach for Defense as well and do everything we can to make him wanna stick around
This post was edited on 12/4/14 at 11:39 pm
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:41 pm to TheSandman
quote:
Shoot, at that point we oughta just make him Head Coach for Defense
That's pretty much what we've already offered. Gus let's the DC run things on the defensive side. All you're saying is give him a different title which would mean nothing to him.
HCIW is the one thing we can't match.
This post was edited on 12/4/14 at 11:42 pm
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:41 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
i don't believe the HCIW thing. That seems like a desperation move.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:42 pm to TheSandman
I like it. Head coach for Defense. Cutting edge sheeeet we doing up in hurr.
How about "Head Coach in Defense and not waiting" because he is already there?
How about "Head Coach in Defense and not waiting" because he is already there?
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:44 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
I firmly believe all those cocks have prematurely fapped over false information.
I never believe the bullshite anymore. I spent an entire week refreshing my computer screen in 2010, and nothing happened.
I tend to take the, "believe it when I see it," stance when it comes to inside information.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:44 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
i don't believe the HCIW thing. That seems like a desperation move.
It is, but it is also brilliant. Spurrier is old as hell. He won't be there much longer. They would have one of the best D coaches in the nation learning how they do things and waiting his time. Those fricking pricks!
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:46 pm to MrAUTigers
I just doubt it.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:47 pm to rbWarEagle
1. It would be idiotic for Muschamp to not take a HCIW position.
2. It would be idiotic for South Carolina to offer a HCIW position. That's one hell of a gamble they would be taking.
2. It would be idiotic for South Carolina to offer a HCIW position. That's one hell of a gamble they would be taking.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:47 pm to LandofDixie
quote:
2. It would be idiotic for South Carolina to offer a HCIW position. That's one hell of a gamble they would be taking.
Agreed.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:49 pm to Weagle25
He has been a HCIW at Texas and that never panned out.
Also, CWM can take the DC job at Auburn and when Spurrier retires, still get the HC job there. But in the meantime, he can coach our defense and compete for championships, and be closer to his family. Win win.
Also, CWM can take the DC job at Auburn and when Spurrier retires, still get the HC job there. But in the meantime, he can coach our defense and compete for championships, and be closer to his family. Win win.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 11:53 pm to rbWarEagle
What in the heck is a "HCIW associate HC of defense"? That's not a real coaching position. That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.
Page 37 of 169
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News