Started By
Message
re: Frick it. Jang’s thoughts
Posted on 10/9/21 at 6:59 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 10/9/21 at 6:59 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
I went back and looked at it. It was right at his head. Was it the best possible spot? No, but it was easily catchable. If you’re going to hold a QB to the standard of having to make the perfect throw then you need to hold WRs/RBs/TEs to the standard of catching everything they touch.
This post was edited on 10/9/21 at 7:00 pm
2
Posted on 10/9/21 at 7:00 pm to jangalang
quote:
As I said in the OP- Mason doesn’t like man because he knows our DBs will get exposed. Maybe we need to blitz more but that just opens up passing holes if we don’t get to the QB. I think that is just a jimmies and joes issue.
We are in a tough spot and there is no right answer really but I am so tired of watching QBs with a clean arse pocket and completing like 80% of their passes against us. If we blitz maybe we give up 85% completions but at least maybe we could get through from time to time and force a mistake and actually get a turnover.
Posted on 10/9/21 at 7:01 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
He had to spin to turn around
No he didn't.
Posted on 10/9/21 at 7:06 pm to AA7
Then I’ll stand corrected. As I said earlier, I was there so didn’t get many replays.
Posted on 10/9/21 at 7:24 pm to AA7
quote:
went back and looked at it. It was right at his head. Was it the best possible spot? No, but it was easily catchable. If you’re going to hold a QB to the standard of having to make the perfect throw then you need to hold WRs/RBs/TEs to the standard of catching everything they touch.
I agree that both positions should be judged equally. Receivers have to eat the bulk of the blame if the ball is there to catch the ball. I’m just saying Bo isn’t the guy to throw receivers open. Sometimes he hits an area target, not a point target.
Posted on 10/9/21 at 9:11 pm to RandySavage
quote:
We are in a tough spot and there is no right answer really but I am so tired of watching QBs with a clean arse pocket and completing like 80% of their passes against us. If we blitz maybe we give up 85% completions but at least maybe we could get through from time to time and force a mistake and actually get a turnover.
This is exactly what A&M is doing tonight and it's working beautifully. When you're outmanned you have to take chances.
Posted on 10/11/21 at 1:25 pm to RandySavage
Does anybody know how Dylan Brooks is doing? We need him to be lifting hard. He can also play 4 games before redshirting. We do not need him or Lee Hunter to be busts.
Posted on 10/31/21 at 12:13 pm to jangalang
Just one thought because everything else is already rehashed
- There was a play that ended in a penalty (or something) and you could clearly tell Harsin sought advice from his assistant. That’s a genuine move from a genuine human. Nobody is perfect. He doesn’t have to stand up there and insist that he is the best coach that knows all the answers. Something like that shows Harsin’s maturity and trust in his staff and I can understand why he wanted his guys.
- There was a play that ended in a penalty (or something) and you could clearly tell Harsin sought advice from his assistant. That’s a genuine move from a genuine human. Nobody is perfect. He doesn’t have to stand up there and insist that he is the best coach that knows all the answers. Something like that shows Harsin’s maturity and trust in his staff and I can understand why he wanted his guys.
Posted on 10/31/21 at 12:15 pm to jangalang
quote:
There was a play that ended in a penalty (or something) and you could clearly tell Harsin sought advice from his assistant
Any more context?
Posted on 10/31/21 at 12:17 pm to GenesChin
I can’t remember the play but it was after a penalty that apparently favored us. Harsin sought out advice from one of his assistants on what they thought was preferable.
Posted on 10/31/21 at 12:17 pm to jangalang
That was the punt return where we were called for holding and the other team was charged with a face mask?. It was an odd rule where for some reason we were allowed to choose which penalty would be enforced and we chose to re kick?
Eh, i didn’t exactly get this right Not even Todd Blackledge understood what was going on.
Eh, i didn’t exactly get this right Not even Todd Blackledge understood what was going on.
This post was edited on 10/31/21 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 10/31/21 at 12:20 pm to ThaiTiger24
That may be it. Does anybody else remember this or am I making shite up!
Posted on 10/31/21 at 12:59 pm to jangalang
Yeah he was consulting Bert Watts because Watts is the ST coordinator
It was the return where both coaches got to decide whether to accept the penalty or not. I didn’t really follow the reasoning
It was the return where both coaches got to decide whether to accept the penalty or not. I didn’t really follow the reasoning
Posted on 10/31/21 at 1:12 pm to TheJones
Yep that’s it. I thought that was an excellent coaching job. I like where the cohesion of our staff is at right now.
Posted on 10/31/21 at 1:43 pm to ThaiTiger24
As the receiving team, we got to choose to decline the other team's penalty (whereby accepting our own, which would be dumb) or proceeding with the offsetting penalties resulting in a re-kick.
I'm not sure why they don't just enforce both penalties in the order they happened - figure out the holding, then tack on 15 yards for face mask.
I'm not sure why they don't just enforce both penalties in the order they happened - figure out the holding, then tack on 15 yards for face mask.
Posted on 11/1/21 at 12:16 pm to AUDevil
quote:
Fouls by both teams during a down offset and the down is repeated at the previous spot - right? Well, that is one option.
However, there is this thing informally referred to as the “clean hands” option. When there is a change of team possession during a down, the team last gaining possession may refuse offsetting fouls by declining the opponent’s penalty, and retain possession of the ball. The opponent may then accept or decline the penalty for that team’s foul.
And PSK fouls qualify as having happened after the change of team possession.
This is the explanation on an NCAA Officiating Board. For those of us with over 20 officiating under our belts. Several f us watching the game across the country.
Auburn committed the first foul. Holding. Likely determined to be pre change of possession.
You don't award in order as suggested by Devil. If Auburn is charged first..... Ole Miss gets a first down by the defensive holding call. Then you would penalize Ole Miss for the facemask penalty and march them back 15 yards with a new LOS and first and ten. Ole Miss retains the ball under that scenario.
The clean hands rule in the KICKING Game ....choses the path to take. After twenty years of Officiating I can safely tell you that a monkey can Officiate 1, 2 and 3rd down .....The kicking game changes boys into men. That's where Officials separate from the average to steps up the chain.
The announcers are useless in every game. They fear their fingers would be scorched if they ever touched a rulebook. Don't count or their "Opinion"
This post was edited on 11/1/21 at 12:22 pm
Page 3 of 3
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News