Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/2/14 at 9:43 am to hg
quote:
The guy was pretty terrible though, brah
If we're banning people because they're terrible posters then half the SECr should be banned right now.
I'm just bothered by how he essentially got setup to be banned. If the admins don't like his posting style then ban him when he's actually posting. That's perfectly fine with me. However, don't ban him when someone bumped posts that are weeks old to make him look like he is flooding the board with flames suddenly.
It's just poor form.
This post was edited on 3/2/14 at 9:46 am
Posted on 3/2/14 at 10:27 am to piggilicious
Yeah, free ArmyHogs, as well. If stating one's opinion about a player or coach is a bannable offense, how is there even a forum in existence? There's a difference between baseless name calling & stating an opinion based on facts.
I'm not really sure how this works. I assume admins do not spend every waking moment perusing every single post, so those "offensive" posts must be brought to their attention through RAs? If so, are some fans (LSU) that upset when someone states an unfavorable opinion of one of their players/coach(es) that they RA???
If I did that every time I saw a derogatory comment/opinion about one of our players/staff, I'd be RAing 90% of the posts in every other thread.
It just seems there's leniency toward some & over zealousness toward others regarding the banning crap. I don't care for the inconsistencies.
I'm not really sure how this works. I assume admins do not spend every waking moment perusing every single post, so those "offensive" posts must be brought to their attention through RAs? If so, are some fans (LSU) that upset when someone states an unfavorable opinion of one of their players/coach(es) that they RA???
If I did that every time I saw a derogatory comment/opinion about one of our players/staff, I'd be RAing 90% of the posts in every other thread.
It just seems there's leniency toward some & over zealousness toward others regarding the banning crap. I don't care for the inconsistencies.
This post was edited on 3/2/14 at 10:29 am
Posted on 3/2/14 at 10:42 am to TheCheshireHog
this was my trick, I never RA though, it's more a demonstration in Hogsession. Or, in this case Bertsession. Beav is already complaining on the Help Board
LINK
LINK
Posted on 3/2/14 at 11:00 am to Latarian
The Free lat thread is already prepped if the worst happens
Posted on 3/2/14 at 11:02 am to Latarian
Beaver chick is a big ole sloppy poon.
Trying way too hard in thread production regarding Arkansas and Bert.
Trying way too hard in thread production regarding Arkansas and Bert.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 11:09 am to Hawgeye
He/she, whatever the frick, is trying to win the Hogsession/Bertsession award. He/she should be eliminated for trying too hard.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 11:18 am to TheOtherWhiteMeat
quote:
He/she should be eliminated for trying too hard.
Or for its use of the "C" word. I do not like it. It is offensive. Maybe I'll start RAing every time I see it. Seems to work for others.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 11:39 am to Latarian
quote:So that's why all the beaver threads are on the first page. I replied to them all but was wondering, "weird why are all of these here?"
this was my trick, I never RA though, it's more a demonstration in Hogsession. Or, in this case Bertsession. Beav is already complaining on the Help Board
Posted on 3/2/14 at 11:42 am to TheCheshireHog
quote:
If we're banning people because they're terrible posters then half the SECr should be banned right now.
Upvoted.
Page 2 of 2
Latest Arkansas News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News