Started By
Message
re: 2014 Arkansas Recruiting Thread - Football & Basketball Commits
Posted on 2/5/14 at 7:56 pm to ocelot4ark
Posted on 2/5/14 at 7:56 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
Kentucky went 3-9, right?
They went 2-10.
But Mizzou did a lot better and we're out recruiting them so your point is moot.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 7:59 pm to Gladius Veritas
We should never get out recruited by Kentucky. Or I need to get used to getting excited about 8 win seasons.
If we get out recruited by Kentucky next year...is it a problem yet?
If we get out recruited by Kentucky next year...is it a problem yet?
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:02 pm to Stonehog
Prestige of program, not just the previous years record. I'd be pissed if I was a Mizzou fan, but at least they don't invest the amount of money in their program that we do.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:04 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
If we get out recruited by Kentucky next year
we're not going to be
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:07 pm to ocelot4ark
Even if we get out recruited by Kentucky next year, it will still have no bearing on our class. Just like this year.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:20 pm to Stonehog
perception is reality with a lot of folks. KY out recruiting us...
Petrino won with less...
If we had a DC we would have done better...
The recruiting sites did us wrong....
We are poor little Arkansas...
Blah, Blah, Blah... Fill the needs the best you can, coach up the best you can, win more...
Period!
Next year will even be better.... Period!
see, I said it with the "period" so it has to be true.. .AMIRIGHT?
Petrino won with less...
If we had a DC we would have done better...
The recruiting sites did us wrong....
We are poor little Arkansas...
Blah, Blah, Blah... Fill the needs the best you can, coach up the best you can, win more...
Period!
Next year will even be better.... Period!
see, I said it with the "period" so it has to be true.. .AMIRIGHT?
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:22 pm to Stonehog
It would if the traditional powers continue to be at the top of recruiting and we're at 30. I can't fathom a reason why anyone would defend setting a precedent of 11th in our conference. We play these schools. Are we deluding ourselves into thinking our western foes aren't developing talent as well? Or filling needs?
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:36 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
It would if the traditional powers continue to be at the top of recruiting and we're at 30. I can't fathom a reason why anyone would defend setting a precedent of 11th in our conference. We play these schools. Are we deluding ourselves into thinking our western foes aren't developing talent as well? Or filling needs?
yet again, we went 3-9 last year. what the frick more do you expect?
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:36 pm to Russvegas Dan
quote:
Its a useless rating.
It's not useless but 30th is pretty damn good considering last season
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:38 pm to ocelot4ark
Kentucky had some highly rated instate players for the first in in forever, also if you own a map, look where Ohio is located, then get online to figure out where the Stoops family is from.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:44 pm to Gladius Veritas
Recruits ratings are continually rated up and down based partially on who is recruiting them and where they commit. The rating itself is inherently flawed. (Bama bump anyone?)
Any statistics drawn from a set numbers skewed in any way by a preconceived outcome is by definition useless.
Any statistics drawn from a set numbers skewed in any way by a preconceived outcome is by definition useless.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:47 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
We should never get out recruited by Kentucky
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:47 pm to Russvegas Dan
yeah but Bama wins a shite ton so they must know something about who to go after
5 stars have the offers from the big schools because they're the best... sure a 3 star might develop into that good of a player but most of the time the 5 star is way more developed
Rankings matter quite a bit
5 stars have the offers from the big schools because they're the best... sure a 3 star might develop into that good of a player but most of the time the 5 star is way more developed
Rankings matter quite a bit
This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 8:48 pm
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:56 pm to The_Joker
quote:
The brilliant Hog Fan from Muskogee. Leader of the Grudenite Rebellion.
Yeah, and he STILL maintains that we had a shot at Gruden.
He has to just be an old dude who quite literally cannot ever admit he's wrong.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 9:00 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
We should never get out recruited by Kentucky. Or I need to get used to getting excited about 8 win seasons. If we get out recruited by Kentucky next year...is it a problem yet?
Lane Kiffin's only class at Tennessee was like #2 in the country. That totally worked out for them and they totally balled out the next 4 years, right?
This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 2/5/14 at 9:03 pm to Gladius Veritas
They are arbitrary numbers defined by people with little or no actual coaching or scouting experience.
They do not mean anything.
They do not mean anything.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 9:06 pm to Feral
When was the last time an SEC team won the conference averaging 30'ish in recruiting?
It matters. The highest probabilities of getting to the NFL lies in the 4 and 5 star players. I never said we couldn't field a good team without them.
It matters. The highest probabilities of getting to the NFL lies in the 4 and 5 star players. I never said we couldn't field a good team without them.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 9:09 pm to Russvegas Dan
quote:
They are arbitrary numbers defined by people with little or no actual coaching or scouting experience.
Then why are most of the 5 stars offered by programs like Bama and FSU?
Posted on 2/5/14 at 9:10 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
When was the last time an SEC team won the conference averaging 30'ish in recruiting?
Meh. Missouri came close to winning it with 30-40ish recruiting
but yeah that was probably the first time since the sites have been around
This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 9:11 pm
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top



1






