Started By
Message

re: Schuman DC Pruitt analyst

Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:32 am to
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Truth is, this season proved it pays to play weaker schedules. Shame on the committee. Bama was clearly a top 4 team and the natty was an embarrassment because the committee didn’t do their dang jobs. Lowest viewed natty in 20 years. Great job playoff committee.

Truth is, the committee just screwed up the initial CFP bracket. Semifinals should've been #1 UGA vs #4 TCU and #2 UM vs #3 OSU.
This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 11:34 am
Posted by crimsontater
Trenton GA
Member since Dec 2009
3732 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:55 am to
personally, i think um should not have been in the cfp at all, with the schedule they played. not a single ranked team in their ooc schedule
Posted by LaneB
Member since Oct 2021
398 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 11:58 am to

quote:


Some guy out on Twitter said that two radio hosts I think out of Mobile (99.5 maybe? ) said he turned the job down… not sure how reliable that is

that sounds credible considering plane was in athens
Posted by Shocco
Member since Nov 2015
1525 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Wrong again
Actually you are wrong. Alabama plays in the SEC. We go undefeated through the SEC and we are in the playoff. We don't need any OOC games to bolster us.
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Actually you are wrong. Alabama plays in the SEC. We go undefeated through the SEC and we are in the playoff. We don't need any OOC games to bolster us.

My point that strength of schedule will prove to be very valuable in the 12-team CFP's seeding is not wrong. You just can't admit your myopic hot takes are flawed. Would you bet on any #8-12 seeds reaching and winning the CFP final? Also, it's pretty dang difficult for Bama to go unscathed in SEC play. You even say FBS CG & OOC games should be nixed.
This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 4:04 pm
Posted by Shocco
Member since Nov 2015
1525 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:56 pm to
Your point is seeding. My point is getting into the playoffs. I let the seeding take care of itself. But I find an SEC team is going to get respect it deserves based on conference rep alone so worrying about seeding is not as important to me unless it becomes blatant they are trying to screw us.. But there are a LOT of factors that we can't discuss here that could be relevant to a specific year or situatation..... But we also need a BCS style computer picking the teams and not people behind closed doors just randomly picking best vs deserving. Bama would have been in this year based on the legit computer models I saw. I 100% stand by OOC and CG.
This post was edited on 1/21/23 at 12:58 pm
Posted by Syd
Member since Sep 2012
2982 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:57 pm to
:Thread derailed:
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 12:57 pm to
Posted by Bamafan4evr12
Member since Jul 2014
1979 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Actually you are wrong. Alabama plays in the SEC. We go undefeated through the SEC and we are in the playoff. We don't need any OOC games to bolster us.


Alabama's problem has never been OOC, when was the last time we lost a regular season OOC game?

I'd rather watch us play the Texases and FSUs of the world then watch a scrimmage against Chattanooga and Wofford
Posted by Shocco
Member since Nov 2015
1525 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 1:04 pm to
The SECCG usually stands to hurt the teams more than help. Its just a money rack for the conference. The conference is here to HELP teams get into the playoffs. Why should our teams have to risk injury, another game before playoffs start, and beating each other up?....The committee may look at that game result and say, "Well, the loser lost another game so we are gonna take an ACC team instead".
Posted by Shocco
Member since Nov 2015
1525 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

I'd rather watch us play the Texases and FSUs
Everyone would agree, but I personally rather see it in a playoff game and not regular season.
Posted by Bamafan4evr12
Member since Jul 2014
1979 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

rather see it in a playoff game and not regular season.


why not both
Posted by Shocco
Member since Nov 2015
1525 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 1:19 pm to
That question kind of loops around to how this whole conversation got started. Playing a hard OOC schedule doesn't improve our chances of getting into the playoffs because we are already in the SEC which carries its own level of difficulty and respect. So all an SEC team has to do is win its games and then they are in the playoffs. Then face other conferences there.
Posted by WeWillFly
Cocaine Lover
Member since Oct 2022
1374 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Playing a hard OOC schedule doesn't improve our chances of getting into the playoffs




Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
40215 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Do we really want Schuman? Does he really call the plays or is it Muschamp? He


Schuman calls the plays
Posted by jryanw
Bham, AL
Member since Dec 2013
4612 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Wrong. Within the 12-team CFP, strength of schedule affects the teams' ranking/seeding. The top-4 seeds get quarter-final byes and the semi-finals at their home stadiums. So, it's smarter to schedule decent OOC opponents who have winning records to beef up your strength of schedule.


If there was a 12 team playoff this year we would’ve still be 5 and TCU would’ve still been 3. Until the committee starts punishing teams for playing a terrible schedule we should do what gives us the best chance to win all of our regular season games.
Posted by jryanw
Bham, AL
Member since Dec 2013
4612 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

Alabama's problem has never been OOC, when was the last time we lost a regular season OOC game?


It’s not about losing the game it’s about the ooc effecting our ability to take it easy before big games on the schedule. Traveling to Austin hurt our ranking this year. There’s no way to prove it but I believe if we hadn’t traveled to Texas we would’ve spent that week preparing for Tennessee and we would’ve beat them.
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 7:42 pm to
The primary issue with our 2022 schedule was playing all of our tougher opponents on the road. Playing an OOC game @Texas didn't cause our poor performance @ Tennessee and @ LSU. Our OC & DC did a poor job and our players were continually shooting us in the foot with costly mistakes. Bryce's injury was a big negative factor too. Eliminate just 1 key mistake in each of those 2 losses and we'd have won both. However, we very nearly lost 2 more games (TX & ATM) in similar fashion.
This post was edited on 1/24/23 at 4:15 pm
Posted by Bamafan4evr12
Member since Jul 2014
1979 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

It’s not about losing the game it’s about the ooc effecting our ability to take it easy before big games on the schedule. Traveling to Austin hurt our ranking this year. There’s no way to prove it but I believe if we hadn’t traveled to Texas we would’ve spent that week preparing for Tennessee and we would’ve beat them.


Iron sharpens iron. That's a proven fact.

We had 3 other cupcakes throughout the year, that's plenty

We lost to Tennessee because we didn't run the clock out and left them time to drive down the field and kick a game winning FG. We lost because we had a shite ton of penalties. Not because we traveled to Austin, Tx 6 weeks earlier
Posted by TiderNAL
Member since Nov 2010
7190 posts
Posted on 1/21/23 at 8:10 pm to
Just shut this stupid thread down
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter