Started By
Message

Saban's view on Golding

Posted on 6/26/19 at 9:07 am
Posted by Tider95
Tuscaloosa
Member since Dec 2017
2137 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 9:07 am
This is from a mailbag Aaron Suttles did on The Athletic. LINK

This was the question.
quote:

There has been a lot of talk about how hard Nick Saban had to work to keep Pete Golding in-house and that he is seen as a rapid riser in the industry. Can you dive a little deeper into what his true impact is and why Saban is so high on him? I have this weird sneaking suspicion in the end it could be Golding who takes over once our Dark Lord retires. Thanks!


quote:

Nick Saban is a master motivator, he possesses several qualities that make him a natural CEO-type leader and he is perhaps the greatest recruiter college football has ever seen. But, at heart, Saban is a football nerd. He genuinely enjoys talking football, teaching the game and learning the game. I could go on and on about the sort of test he puts candidates to join his program through. Once, in an interview for an off-the-field role, Saban put a candidate on the board as soon as he arrived at his house. There wasn’t a formal interview first, it was straight to the board to size him up. Saban had the candidate diagram plays and then Saban would throw different scenarios at him to see how he would handle it. It was a sort of cat-and-mouse game, and Saban was using the board work to determine how this particular candidate would fit on his staff.


quote:

Back in February, when it was becoming clear that Alabama was going to hold off overtures toward Golding from programs like Oklahoma, The Athletic’s Bruce Feldman had an outstanding look at Golding and specifically how he came up in the game proving himself on the board. He was comfortable diagramming plays and coming up with answers on the fly when coaches asked what he’d do to counter this or that. He was more than just comfortable. He thrived in that environment. Imagine then how impressed Saban must’ve been when he put Golding to the test. The football nerd in Saban must have gone into overdrive. Then Golding proved himself in his first year with the Crimson Tide when, during the season, he essentially began calling the defense instead of defensive coordinator Tosh Lupoi. Then you add in Golding’s ability to build relationships as a recruiter, and it’s easy to see why Saban was willing to do whatever he had to do to keep Golding, including naming him Alabama’s defensive coordinator.

Posted by MagillaGuerilla
Nick Fairley Fan Club, Founder
Member since Nov 2009
35444 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 9:52 am to
It's kinda scary how much Golding mirrors Kirby Smart.

Even down to Will Muschamp while at Valdosta State having a similar story on a chalkboard hiring a young Kirby Smart. He was drawing up plays to stop offenses...with only 10 on defense
Posted by Tider95
Tuscaloosa
Member since Dec 2017
2137 posts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 9:54 am to
quote:

It's kinda scary how much Golding mirrors Kirby Smart.

they kind of look the same too

In all seriousness, I think Saban sees Smart/Pruitt in Golding and that can only mean good things for us.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22511 posts
Posted on 6/28/19 at 12:06 am to
quote:

Then Golding proved himself in his first year with the Crimson Tide when, during the season, he essentially began calling the defense instead of defensive coordinator Tosh Lupoi.


I'll be honest. This part worries me. I thought the extremely bad play calling vs Clemson was because of Tosh. If he was already calling the plays at that point, then I'm a bit sad.

Trust in Saban, hope for the best and all that, but I thought we were getting rid of the NCG issues.
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 6/28/19 at 12:49 am to
quote:

I thought the extremely bad play calling vs Clemson was because of Tosh. If he was already calling the plays at that point, then I'm a bit sad.



Take away Savion Smith's manning running free, and you take away nearly all of Clemson's chunk plays. Isaiah Buggs was playing on one leg, and I have a hard time believing he was our best option at the position. Furthermore, we had an "attention to detail" problem with some folks looking forward to the draft.

If Trevon Diggs had been healthy, and we had been willing to play some youth along the Dline, I think our plan would have showed itself to be just fine.

The plan wasn't the problem, the personnel was - at least in spots.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22511 posts
Posted on 6/28/19 at 12:59 am to
quote:


Take away Savion Smith's manning running free, and you take away nearly all of Clemson's chunk plays. Isaiah Buggs was playing on one leg, and I have a hard time believing he was our best option at the position. Furthermore, we had an "attention to detail" problem with some folks looking forward to the draft.

If Trevon Diggs had been healthy, and we had been willing to play some youth along the Dline, I think our plan would have showed itself to be just fine.

The plan wasn't the problem, the personnel was - at least in spots.


True, but I was also not very impressed with the blitzes and pressure we were bringing. I was missing Pruit hardcore.

If Pruit was the DC, do you think it's the same game? I don't.

And like with SS, it wasn't shocking what happened, it was the same story all year long. How does that not get accounted for or at least have a backup plan to help him? Oklahoma for some dumb reason decided not to abuse him, which was more surprising than what Clemson did to him.

Can't just throw up plays like it's madden, gotta account for all the details. Clemson's coaches sure as hell did. I've been under the assumption it was due to Tosh's lack of experience.
Posted by BamaBo7
Madison,MS
Member since Jan 2017
5686 posts
Posted on 6/28/19 at 7:28 am to
Didn’t we stunt with the D line on the goal line..lol I trust in Saban but I wasn’t impressed either. The play calling wasn’t great and Clemson abused him. Delay blitz’s weren’t working from the start, but we kept them coming. The lack of adjustment is what worried me.. and the fact we stunted on the damn goal line.
This post was edited on 6/28/19 at 7:32 am
Posted by tider04
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2007
5606 posts
Posted on 6/28/19 at 8:32 am to
Our defense was horrid in the Clemson game, but much of it was personnel issues:

1. Savion was terrible, and should not have been in the game. Jobe was better as a TF. The Diggs injury was killer at this spot.

2. Buggs was a gimp after Auburn chop blocked him, but our staff inexplicably kept running him out there all post-season instead of Ray even though Buggs literally would just stand there after the ball was snapped and was ineffective against the run and pass. This is on the staff, and ultimately on Saban IMO. Ray should have been the man the rest of the way after Buggs got injured.

3. Christian Miller getting hurt against OU was killer. In retrospect, we should have played Anoma more in obvious passing downs.

None of that was on Golding. I thought we should have been more aggressive with blitzes to counteract out lack of pass rush but I went back and watched most of the game and we did try some exotic blitzes. Clemson killed us every single time we tried. It was just one of those games that everything that could go right for Clemson did, and everything that could go wrong for Bama did. I'm convinced those two teams could have played 10 times and Bama would have won 5-6 of them, but that night nobody was beating Clemson.
This post was edited on 6/28/19 at 8:40 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter