Started By
Message
re: Official Fall Camp Discussion Thread - Who Wants to Wear Out That Trojan arse?
Posted on 8/30/16 at 9:44 am to Gary Busey
Posted on 8/30/16 at 9:44 am to Gary Busey
Shank was found not guilty in his DUI and leaving the scene case.
What could this mean for our starting offensive linemen?
What could this mean for our starting offensive linemen?
Posted on 8/30/16 at 9:53 am to TideSaint
quote:
What could this mean for our starting offensive linemen?
tough call. Would be hard to change centers AGAIN in a couple of weeks, even though RP is the best option there and Shank is better option at RG than Bozeman (I would assume).
Probably just means more depth in the immediate future.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:00 am to bamasgot13
Taylor is a great run blocker when he gets a hold on someone but sucks in pass pro and has a hard time with DL who are quick. Bozeman isn't as big but is more balanced. Bozeman at center works because having Pierschbacher at guard is just too much upside for the whole line. Really it would come down to Pierschbacher vs Taylor and Taylor couldn't hold RP's jock strap.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:02 am to South Alabama Tide
Taylor has a lot of penalties as well
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:03 am to Rizzy
He does. Honestly RP and JW on the right side is so much better than AT and DJ it's insane to think about.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:06 am to TideWarrior
quote:
The strength for them is their OL.
While I'm not knocking the sentiment behind the above statement, I think it needs a little clarification:
First, while their line should be good, it's an "on paper" situation. Why? Not all of their returning starters are returning starters from last year. They had injuries last year to a guy or 2. What I mean by that is this unit is 5 guys who have a lot of total starts each, but not together as a unit.
Second, USC has, this year, a new offensive line coach for the 4th consecutive year.
My overriding point is that while most expect USC to have a good Oline, it is not a known, demonstrable commodity at this point. They might be juggernauts, but I'll believe it when I see it. (Especially given that their LT is fighting plantar fascitis)
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:11 am to TideWarrior
quote:
Actually their DL this year has more talent then last according to their sites and what I heard. Basically like replacing starters who were 3 stars with experience now with 4 star backups they think will be stronger across the board. Also they brought in a top JUCO DL and and grad transfer for the DL from Utah.
I lurked on some USC sites just after spring ball to get a feel for them, and their fanbase indicated that not only was DL the worst unit on the team going into spring, but they got absolutely hammered by injuries in that unit. Like comically hammered. The narrative I saw was that their DL was going to be laughably bad.
Granted, the 2 transfers you mentioned are news to me, and maybe they developed a bit of talent there in a few months, but I have a hard time believing that their biggest liability BY FAR - Dline - went from an atrocious situation post-spring to any kind of benefit today.
This post was edited on 8/30/16 at 10:12 am
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:19 am to prevatt33
Three of their four returning OL started together last year. That's including Wheeler who is now hurt. Banner and Mama are both very good and expected to go in the 2nd or 3rd round next year. Again I did not say their OL would be great just their strength of their team but with Wheeler out that is a big it to the OL.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:23 am to TideSaint
How'd he get the name Shank?
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:23 am to prevatt33
Notre Dame hammered them good with the run last year. They better hope they improved
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:26 am to prevatt33
quote:
I lurked on some USC sites just after spring ball to get a feel for them, and their fanbase indicated that not only was DL the worst unit on the team going into spring, but they got absolutely hammered by injuries in that unit. Like comically hammered. The narrative I saw was that their DL was going to be laughably bad.
Granted, the 2 transfers you mentioned are news to me, and maybe they developed a bit of talent there in a few months, but I have a hard time believing that their biggest liability BY FAR - Dline - went from an atrocious situation post-spring to any kind of benefit today.
In 2015 they were 45th against the run @ 147 yards per game and 70th overall at 401 ypg. Those numbers were 5th best in the Pac-12 for both categories.
Without knowing how transfers and JUCOs will play, I can certainly see how a lot of injuries could make the fans have a pessimistic outlook.
Let's hope their fears are justified.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:27 am to prevatt33
They big loss on a D this year is Bigelow out for the season but Stevie Tu'ikolovatu(Grad transfer) visited UA in May before picking USC. The Juco transfer will bring experience. I am not saying they will have a lot of experience but they will have depth. I also believe they moved K Rogers from offense to the DL this offseason. The real strength of their DL this fall is under their DC who plays a base 5-2. Their top returning LBs play on the outside and will create a lot of havoc.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:31 am to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
They better hope they improved
Their DC who came back from the NFL back to USC and also has been one of the best DCs in that conference. His first year at Cal he held Oregon, the NC that year to under 45 below there average score for the season.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:31 am to prevatt33
quote:
Second, USC has, this year, a new offensive line coach for the 4th consecutive year.
By the way a former Alabama OL coach
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:45 am to TideWarrior
quote:At Bama during the dreaded Albert Means scandal. Was he cleared of the NCAA violations for helping a player get a vehicle?
By the way a former Alabama OL coach
Posted on 8/30/16 at 10:45 am to SummerOfGeorge
What's the Vegas line?
Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:00 am to TideWarrior
Returning starters, fyi: USC Season preview (short)
My take on the USC game is this:
Their offense is legit. Lots of talent at the skill positions, solid, experienced Oline. New statue at QB. IMO, they will not be able to run the ball very well. Why? I don't think their running game is better than ours, and we couldn't run it much against our 1s in multiple scrimmages.
I think their ability to have success on Offense hinges 100% on their ability to give their QB time to operate and toss the rock around. Brown is a statue whose forty time should be measured in Julian years, and we ought to have the best, or nearly so, pass rush in CFB. I think we're gonna give them fits. We'll be the best defense they face all year by a country mile. However, if they give Brown time, it could be a long day.
Regarding their defense, I have loads of respect for their secondary. I cannot say the same for their front 7. They lost most of the folks from their front 7 last year, and while I know USC recruits well, they are still not where they need to be in that department. I think we should manhandle their front 7 all day, and be able to run the ball nearly at will. I think we'll throw only just enough to keep them honest and get into an old-fashioned ground-n-pound afternoon. If they reliably shut down our run game and force us to throw, we'd be playing right into their hands. I expect a boring, but effective offensive night from Bama and a solid, but maybe not flashy, win.
Things that worry me:
Field goals. I love Griffith and have supported him from jump street. But if he's not physically healthy, I'd rather be a 4-down team than try field goals in plus territory.
Turnovers. No explanation necessary.
My take on the USC game is this:
Their offense is legit. Lots of talent at the skill positions, solid, experienced Oline. New statue at QB. IMO, they will not be able to run the ball very well. Why? I don't think their running game is better than ours, and we couldn't run it much against our 1s in multiple scrimmages.
I think their ability to have success on Offense hinges 100% on their ability to give their QB time to operate and toss the rock around. Brown is a statue whose forty time should be measured in Julian years, and we ought to have the best, or nearly so, pass rush in CFB. I think we're gonna give them fits. We'll be the best defense they face all year by a country mile. However, if they give Brown time, it could be a long day.
Regarding their defense, I have loads of respect for their secondary. I cannot say the same for their front 7. They lost most of the folks from their front 7 last year, and while I know USC recruits well, they are still not where they need to be in that department. I think we should manhandle their front 7 all day, and be able to run the ball nearly at will. I think we'll throw only just enough to keep them honest and get into an old-fashioned ground-n-pound afternoon. If they reliably shut down our run game and force us to throw, we'd be playing right into their hands. I expect a boring, but effective offensive night from Bama and a solid, but maybe not flashy, win.
Things that worry me:
Field goals. I love Griffith and have supported him from jump street. But if he's not physically healthy, I'd rather be a 4-down team than try field goals in plus territory.
Turnovers. No explanation necessary.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:05 am to prevatt33
Agree 100% with all of that.
I think the only chance we lose is to get bogged down in the red zone, miss field goals and give them short fields.
I think the only chance we lose is to get bogged down in the red zone, miss field goals and give them short fields.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:10 am to SummerOfGeorge
What's the chances of Shank playing over Cotton? Seems more likely to me if Bozeman is our best option at center.
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top



2





