Started By
Message

re: CFP Committee needs to scrap this current format.

Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:34 pm to
Posted by LovetheLord
The Ash Grove
Member since Dec 2010
6574 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:34 pm to
Gotta figure that after last year and this, the system is going to be reformed so as not to waste two games on teams that truly have no business being there.
Posted by TTOWN RONMON
Member since Oct 2023
1590 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:53 pm to
I disagree, the one team that gets in with the soon to be 16 or 24 game playoffs will give the lowers teams something ton play for. JMU getting into the playoffs might give them enough bucks to but a couple of good D-linemen and I think with the 13 pens by those zebras that game is even closer, they could not stop them all night without pens.

The truth is if Indiana can go to number 1 in two years any of these teams can have a special year. The problem this year was getting in 2 teams because of Duke winning the ACC. Nobody minds the one team. Some years they can compete, Tulane was a bad choice they saw they lost to Ole Miss by 35. JMU might have beat Texas AM Its good for the game to get one team in, but not 2. And they could take the 2 best teams and play a play in game Friday night before the Sat Army Navy game.

That way all the other conferences start the year with a hope, they can have a shot, if they go like 11-0 or 12-0. We need Rocky to have a shot.
Posted by Mobile Patriot
Mobile
Member since Aug 2024
847 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:33 am to
The selection committee is a joke. Half of those idiots know less about football than the average poster on this board.
Posted by Syd
Member since Sep 2012
4979 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 6:12 am to
So which games were worse, Miami A&M tied at 3 late in the fourth or the two blowouts?
Posted by Amarillo Tide
Amarillo, TX
Member since Aug 2023
1744 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 6:47 am to
Meh. I get it that the media and ESPN LOOOOOOOOVE the movie "Hoosiers" (I do too TBH) where some team that no one has heard of with players no one has heard of but play with a lot of pluck come in and knock off the big boys.

But that's just not reality 99.999999 percent of the time. The fact is schools like Tulane or JMU or Jax State almost never can compete against the big guys and usually get blown out.

I'm not against a G5 school getting in per se but they need to show that during the season that they can knock off a good opponent or two in the OOC schedule and win their conference. So, schools like Tulane need to start scheduling and BEATING teams like Ohio State or Alabama or Georgia.

If they can do that and win their conference, I'm all for those type schools getting a spot. Until then, NO.
Posted by captainFid
Never apologize to barbarism
Member since Dec 2014
9663 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Why do you have Rosa Delauro in your profile pic?

I thought it was a drawing of some cave dweller; it's a reminder of that irony.
Posted by crimsontater
Trenton GA
Member since Dec 2009
4001 posts
Posted on 12/21/25 at 1:50 pm to
the same committee that just put 2 g5 teams in the cfp also tells the big boys not to schedule any ooc team that might beat them.

personally i wish the g5's would have their own cfp. it would benefit both the g5 and football fans. a g5 would be national champ every year and football fans would get more football. not to mention g5's getting more tv money.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter