re: Alabama Board Coronavirus Thread

quote:

---

That is avoiding the question. You're calling for the mass murder of Americans and can't give me the perimeters for who falls into that category.

---

I didn't call for "mass executions" or "mass murder". Those words are yours and Spleen's attempts to distort and misrepresent the gist of what I posted. I don't work for the FBI or CIA, so I don't know who the main leaders are or how many there are. If they're Americans, they're 100% guilty of treason. If wiretaps, etc. clearly show they're guilty, I have no problem with them being covertly eliminated without the same "due process" American citizens are ordinarily entitled to in criminal cases, as publicized trials would likely lead to extensive rioting.

quote:

---

It has literally nothing to do with anything and is a hilarious example of a struggling attempt you made to do exactly what you bitched about.

---

Except I am not bitching about anything nor am I struggling with regards to commenting on your post. I simply read your post regarding your concerns and responded. You did not like my post and responded back. I do not see anywhere in my post that I was bitching or complaining. I simply replied and pointed out a narrative you presented based your beliefs and called it into question.

quote:

---

I think that's disingenuous in the extreme.

---

Here's the post that started the discussion. It's back on page 102, and is in response to a comment about Marxist scum protesting.

quote:

---

Isn't inciting nation-wide rioting and anarchy a serious treasonous crime? Yes, it certainly is.

So, covertly arrest them and dump them at the north pole from an airplane at very high altitude. They'll crystalize and then shatter. Or ball & chain them and dump them into the open ocean or a volcano full of fiery molten lava. Game over.

I'm serious. And that's all I have to say about it.

---

Seems pretty clear to me he is advocating mass executions.

quote:

---

No one has a right to smash windows or block streets

---

But they should be murdered for it? Or murdered for organizing it?

quote:

---

Seems pretty clear to me he is advocating mass executions.

---

Of course it does.

quote:

---

Of course it does.

---

I mean, you doubled down on it, so there really isn't much ambiguity here.

I respect edits as sometimes shite gets left out and grammatical errors happen, especially as I am sure a bunch of use our phones here. I do it on like 75% of my posts, I'm sure.

However, editing the content of your post instead of replying is disingenuous.

quote:

---

Those words are yours and Spleen's attempts to distort and misrepresent the gist of what I posted

---

quote:

---

Marxist scum have already pledged to riot if the President tries to replace her before the election.

Isn't inciting nation-wide rioting and anarchy a serious treasonous crime? Yes, it certainly is.

So, covertly arrest them and dump them at the north pole from an airplane at very high altitude. They'll crystalize and then shatter. Or ball & chain them and dump them into the open ocean or a volcano full of fiery molten lava. Game over.

I'm serious. And that's all I have to say about it.

---

is your post. You in no way specified "who" that was other than "marxist scum who have pledged to riot". That is extremely broad and in no way limited to a handful or organizers that you want to assassinate, which also is still abhorrent political violence.

Do you not see how, with rhetoric being what it is today, a person who is more on the left could easily interpret that to be targeted at them?

I've clarifed that my post was about eliminating "a few top leaders of organizations (e.g., Antifa) bent on destroying America from within. That's what I was thinking about when I posted it. Obviously, I should've made that clear.

I expect that you and Spleen will continue to insist that you weren't mistaken in your own misinterpretation and misrepresentation of what I meant by my post.

I'll just ask one question and hang up and listen: where has ignoring/condoning these protests by the standing government agencies like in Portland gotten us? Have they stopped? Protesting is ok. Rioting, looting, and destroying private property is not. And six months from now, these same rioters and local politicians will be standing there with their hands out for Federal dollars to revitalize their cities because the small business owner who has lost his livelihood when his or her business was looted and burned has fled the cities for the suburbs. Not my tax dollars; live in the shithole you created by being a dumbass.

The young whites y'all are speaking about mostly identify with Antifa which is about the dumbest fricking movement out there. They call themselves anarchists, but basically it's just a cover for bored, young, affluent SJW wannabes to take to the streets and act like thugs and criminals. And they deserve to have their teeth knocked out and be thrown in jail because they are fighting for NOTHING. They are violent just to be violent. They are mostly white, often female, and mostly middle to upper middle class, and won't do shite unless they have overwhelming numbers in their favor. When met with equal or anywhere near equal force, they turn tail and haul arse like the cowards they are. They don't have a damn thing to be "disaffected" by except tired of being a Karen. I have no sympathy for them whatsoever.

I agree with everything you said