Favorite team:LSU 
Location:alexandria
Biography:attorney
Interests:golf, movies, bass guitar, farming
Occupation:real estate lawyer
Number of Posts:6616
Registered on:12/5/2005
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
they both have stout front 7's and so far we have lost every game against stout front 7's, losing in the same fashion each time.

the only explanation for the other consistency in losses is that our defense, which looks great for most of the game, all of a sudden can't stop a pee-wee offense, has to be the coaching, and by that it means we change our defensive posture, scheme, etc., basically switching to prevent defense.

we keep trying to run in the red zone with scant success. Trey Dez is never tried down there, even as a decoy.

our coaching staff doesn't seem to learn anything with experience this year. I like Kiffen, but not so much our coordinators.

I am pessimistic about the rest of this season. I expect to see no changes and the same old script the next 2 weeks. I hope i'm wrong. At least we get arkansas to close the season on a positive note, unless we are totally demoralized by the time we get there.

To paraphrase Clarice speaking to Rudolph, "there's always "next season!"

I am behind our team 100 per cent, just trying to be realistic so I don't get too depressed. Geaux Tigers!
same story at lsu for most of my life. lots of talent in the skill positions but we always struggle to have a good offensive line. we used to always have great defensive lines but when was the last time?
you say the juice will be gone from the tenner game if they lose to kentucky, but think again. nothing would make them feel better than to beat us at home. And it should be a big must win game for us as well.
chambliss was great under kiffin. coaching and play calling make a difference.
fathoming the polls is really no great mystery. the voters are looking at future opponents left on everyone's schedule.. LSU is really a top 10 team today. But, our next game is alabama. Look at these cupcakes ranked ahead of us. then look at their schedules. their chances of losing against their weak opponents is not strong.

we beat alabama and everything falls into place for us.
LSU starts giving 3 points. Watchng both teams play, LSU should win by 10 plus. DeBoer ain't Saban. And a big question - does Alabama get healthy on their Oline by game time?
so much depends on the offensive line. LSU's line is playing well. Kentucky is blessed with a good Oline. Ole MIss, Alabama are 2 teams where the injury bug is biting the hell out of their oline. You just can't run an offense without a good oline.

Or qb, LSU has one. it's interesting to me the contrast between Marcel Reed and LaNorris Sellers. Both are very extraordinary athletes, who are sandlot qb's. Not insulting them or trying to, just pointing it out. What we are seeing though is that Art Briles is working with Sellers to make him a trained qb and Elko has done nothing with Reed. Sellers is starting to function on a higher level, and Reed is dissolving into nothingness. Sark has not done a good job with Manning either. coaching.
Congrats! enjoy your moment in the sun, and being proud of your team.
Has LSU improved into a very good football team? Have they got some chemistry going? Has the Oline improved by now? Is Sam Leavitt settled in? Has the staff figured out we can't play zone and/or soft defense?

I think so. We find out tomorrow. Geaux Tigers!
no conference championship games.

re: Sankey’s strategy

Posted by stephendomalley on 10/15/26 at 7:31 am to
you're overthinking this. Sankey is just a moron. A petty imbecile.
quote:

The conservative offensive decisions go against CLK’s philosophy and its biting him.


i agree with this and posted same on another post. we don't want him coaching stupid but that's what he's doing being as conservative as he is. We won't pass inside the 10 unless it's 3rd down. at least most of the time. I dont get it.
it's good that we play at home. if taylor plays, you cannot count on blake baker to play aggressively. if we've learned anything, that's it.

i definitely have confidence that we win at home. but if taylor plays, it will be close. look at all those plays we gave up against kentucky. this defense generally plays well but we are having multiple big gaffes every game.

i'll take a one point win. If taylor can't go or is hobbled, then we should beat the spread.

First, though, i don't give a damn about our rankings. win losses are what matters.

But, LSU is such a good team that having Kentucky beat them at Kentucky's home field in overtime by 1 point means Kentucky is such a really good team they go way up in the rankings. But if Kentucky is rewarded for beating such a top team, then why is that top team punished so hard in the polls for losing by 1 point in overtime to Kentucky at home.

doesn't make any sense to me. They shouldn't even have rankings until after week 8 at least.
If we go for it and don't make it we are forced to play aggressively on defense, enhancing our chances to win. i don't think kiffin's personality is soft, so it's a mistake for him to play safe. there are times to play it smart, but that's not always the same as playing it safe.
i'll be rooting for the Dawgs, but I expect them to lose to Alabama, cause that's what Kirby does. I really respect Kirby as a coach, but when it comes to alabama he always shoots himself in the foot, taking gambles he doesn't need to take instead of just trusting his team, making various other bad decisions. he is a better coach than DeBoer, but he loses his nerve in this game. Plus it is at alabama.

Hope the weather doesn't stop the game.
Of LSU's 9 SEC opponents, only one, poor Arkansas, is not quality. Auburn is the next least of the teams we play. Everyone else has a good to really good team. This is great except for the playoff format, where 2 teams seem to get in every year that have no business being there. 9-3 SEC teams should be treated like 10-2 teams in the process. but they won't be.

Stankey Sankey really let us down. As did the Big 10 commissioner
credit the defense for a portion of those stats. they keep giving the offense the ball. And the offense, while not totally in sync, is getting better and better.
this doesn't look like his year. I expect him to be better by the end of the season, but he doesn't look capable of leading Texas to the promised land this season.

If he comes back, next year, I can see it if he still has a good team surrounding him. I'm thinking he's like a lot of players, they are just a little behind the curve until their final year and then it clicks.
true, injuries always occur, and they can wreck a season if you have to0 many.

it's different now, and more critical, though, because you cannot load up on depth with the current rule structure. But you are right, you just have to roll with the flow. If injuries ruin your chances at a championship run, that's just the way it is. everyone has this problem.

where i can tend to get steamed about it is teams like Notre Dame with cupcake schedules which increases their odds of getting through their schedule with fewer significant injuries. SEC and Big 10 are going to suffer bloodbaths in this era. Like that great philosopher Rastus once observed - "It is what it is" ( it iyah what it iyah),

kiffin had the film on leavitt

Posted by stephendomalley on 9/26/26 at 7:30 am
and he knows he needs a good passer to run his offense.

based on leavitt's play thus far, it seems a little strange. Leavitt is missing a lot of opportunites downfield No coach is perfect in assessing talent, and you have to remember that Chambliss wouldn't have gotten his chance if Austin Simmons doesn't get hurt. Austin Simmons is not impressive from what I've seen.

I'm not saying it's time to dump Leavitt, I just wish we would get a look at our second stringer for a few series. Not going to happen, I get that.

so i sure hope we see some improvement from our oline and QB.

LSU football is still a lot more fun to watch. I'm just tamping down my expectations for this year.