Favorite team:Tulane 
Location:Mar-a-Lago
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:3368
Registered on:5/7/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Pureblood check in time!

Posted by RFK on 8/11/26 at 12:15 am to
Checking in (had one Phizer shot but refused the rest; it was a 3 shot series at the time and I had to have it to travel for my company. Refused to get the rest.)
quote:

America's recommended more childhood vaccines than any peer nation, and even twice as many doses as some European countries.
Wait so MAGA likes Europe now?

I’m confused.
These constraints are called the law of armed conflict.

These laws were enacted after 2 wars that almost ended civilization as we know it.

Trust the plan.

Exactly. They were private records. Not related to his duties.

Again, all for transparency, but in this age almost anything can be found online. I’m sure he did not intend for his private diaries to be on a government server.
How did they get his journal or texts?

Invasion of privacy much? It’s not like these were on a government device.

I’m all for transparency but there’s a privacy element here.
quote:

The civilian’s are controlling the straight?
Why are you giving foreign policy advice when you can’t even use a goddamned apostrophe correctly?

Nixon administration truly was peak America. He insisted on military officers who read Homer in Greek.
quote:

Yeah, frick that. Bombs away, no mercy.
You ignoramous.

What are you going to bomb? All that’s left are civilian targets. The inside POLADs didn’t think this one through.

This country is massive. 90 million people and the capital city is 90 miles from the nearest Iranian coast. Hard to project power inside the country without boots on the ground (which is a practical impossibility).
Why this board cares so much about the WNBA, I will never know.
Seems fishy.

Not exactly sure what his “job” is. Making videos? AI can do that in an instant.

Should have learned to code my bro.
Honestly I’m good with it.

If I haven’t committed a crime, I don’t care if they record me. If they accidentally stop me I would assume it can be cleared up as soon as they realize I haven’t committed a crime.

These are the compromises a modern society makes for the benefit of all.
.08 miles is roughly 400 feet.

That’s pretty big separation, especially for a helicopter.

Not sure what the issue is here.
She’s also a doctor (PHD).
Downvote if you would turn your own son into law enforcement.
Novel idea - instead of blind hate directed towards an entire religion, why don't we focus efforts on showing them why the GOP is the superior party?

We're not going to stop immigration, and with the recent SCOTUS ruling, the population will continue to trend towards making them the majority within 50 years.
quote:

As opposed to the current model where only a dozen at most swing states matter
Fair point.

There is an argument that the EC is non-representative in this sense. I gather most here live in smaller population centers (or have different politics than the majority of their large cities).

Kamala may be simply trying to drum up support from far-left donors in anticipation of a 2028 run.
quote:

You are always on the wrong side of every issue - mob rule is always bad, and it is perniciously bad when there is no voting integrity
I’m not on either side of this issue, I’m simply debating the pros and cons of the practical effect of removing it after Kamala stated this is one of her goals.

I don’t think it guarantees her (or her party) the result they want.
If Kamala wants to eliminate the EC, she is betting that future demographics will ensure Democrat-leaning candidates will win.

Do population trends support this? I see people moving out of cities and into smaller towns.
quote:

Retards who don’t understand we aren’t a direct democracy and never have been. I’m sorry they are retarded. You don’t let retards rule the roost. You pet them on their head, give them their toy, and let the grown ups dictate things.
This claim is wrong because critics of the Electoral College generally understand the United States is a constitutional republic, not a pure direct democracy, and simply argue that selecting the president by national popular vote remains fully compatible with that republican framework.
Winner-take-all allocation of electors—adopted by most states and changeable by them without altering the Constitution—does amplify divergences between the national popular vote and Electoral College outcomes, even as the underlying system remains grounded in state-based electors.
Persistent mismatches in which the national popular-vote winner loses the presidency, combined with sustained majority public support for a direct popular election, will eventually encourage elimination of the Electoral College.

This has happened five times so far:

• 1824: Andrew Jackson (popular vote winner) lost to John Quincy Adams

• 1876: Samuel Tilden (popular vote winner) lost to Rutherford B. Hayes

• 1888: Grover Cleveland (popular vote winner) lost to Benjamin Harrison

• 2000: Al Gore (popular vote winner) lost to George W. Bush

• 2016: Hillary Clinton (popular vote winner) lost to Donald Trump