User Avatar

MasterOfTheObvious

Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:21
Registered on:4/7/2024
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Edey dominating Clingan. But Uconn still winning. Not a good sign for Purdue


UConn played a great game and their coach had a great gameplan.

Nobody stopping Edey but they took away the shooters for Purdue. And when they did get a shot the shooters were ice cold.

I was pulling for Purdue but there is no doubt that they got outplayed and out coached by UConn

Congrats to UConn on going B2B
quote:

Literally every post by this poster is about chicks with alleged dicks

Not an exaggeration


Because it is a joke that SC is allowed to play them and nobody dares challenge it or else they will be a NCAA outcast.

It is a joke that the NCAA lets the guys compete against women in swimming, track and now basketball.

The whole idea of Title IX was to give women equal opportunity. Now the NCAA is allowing men to take that away in the name of Wokeness.

The women competing against men should refuse to compete and call out the lunacy not quietly go along with it for fear of being called transphobic.

But your not correct. I also point out that Clark is the main reason for the ratings explosion this year and that people that think this was some kind of turning point to a new world where Woman's basketball is bigger than football and men's basketball are delusional. Next year will be back to normal with Clark gone.
Especially now that it is Transgender Basketball not Women's Basketball anymore
Wanna bet no WCBB game next year tops 10 Million?

It's all about Clark

Ratings next year will fall off a cliff
Yep....first time a team of Trans players beat the Women for a Championship*
Dead on.

She most likely was not only in favor of cancelling the tournament, she was probably demanding it

She had them this year.

Tell me this isn't a dude.

LINK
Thats because some of them are dudes.
}
#2 absolutely is a dude

LINK

re: Sorry but Clark sucks

Posted by MasterOfTheObvious on 4/8/24 at 8:00 am
Maybe she just struggles against male players like they have on SCs team?
It doesn't matter.

The viewership was all about

Clark v Reese
Clark v UConn
Clark v the Transgender Champions* South Carolina

I am a lifelong sports fan and those three games plus last year's Natty Clark vs LSU are the only 4 games of Women's basketball I have ever watched. And most sports fans are just like me.

No Clark....No watch. Viewership will drop dramatically next year without Clark.
She had to say that because she has at least two on her team right now.

I just wish the reporter had followed up her response by asking "Do you have any transgender players on your team right now?" Put her on the spot to admit it or risk pissing off the boys on her team
How do you know? Do you get to panty check all the players in D1 Women's Hoops?

#2 on South Carolina is 100% a male. #12 is almost certainly male as well.

This South Carolina Championship has a big * next to it.

Actually I think #2 is absolutely a guy. #12 probably a guy. They are much more obvious.

I would have loved it if the reporter followed up his question with "do you have any transgender players on your team?" and put her on the spot to admit it.
People that are proclaiming that the women's basketball is now super popular are going to be crushed when viewership takes a huge drop next year.

Clark was the reason people watched the last 3 games. I agree that with her gone the interest will go way down.

The only thing that made the woman's game interesting (given that they play below the rim) was a girl bombing 3s from insane distances. Take that away and it is like watching a Jr High School boys game....kinda sloppy, no dunks, players out of control.

The people who are proclaiming this is a turning point are wrong. We just witnessed a peak in popularity not a turning point.