
DeepBlueSea
| Favorite team: | Louisiana Tech |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 815 |
| Registered on: | 1/17/2018 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Any of you baws have veeners?
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 5/19/25 at 8:42 pm to Ingeniero
Wtf did those two do to themselves. They look like Sims.
re: Nottoway Plantation on fire
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 5/16/25 at 3:16 pm to saderade
quote:
All of Reddit
Their argument is the place romanticizes slavery and having weddings/parties there is the most despicable thing in the world.
Obviously, that’s ridiculous, but that’s their mindset
And they’re absolutely entitled to that opinion. It’s not like they were going to be forced to patronize Nottoway if it hadn’t burned down. Most of the ones complaining never even laid eyes on the place, so however personally repugnant they found the house or its history, its continued existence had no material effect on their lives whatsoever.
Don’t like it? By all means, don’t support it. Tell everyone you don’t support it and why, if that floats your boat. That’s completely your right.
Instead all that happened was the (free, willingly-employed) people who relied on NP for their income saw their livelihood literally go up in smoke, a disadvantaged community lost a significant chunk of its economic base overnight, and a complicated but important historical record was destroyed — but let’s all clap like seals because schadenfreude, I guess?
I keep waiting for someone to explain how very real, measurable, and widespread material harm (which will affect plenty of black people too) creates a net positive from this equation, but so far there have been no takers.
re: The Average Weight for American Women
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 3/30/25 at 10:15 am to NorthstarinLA
quote:
If your 5’3 athletic build 125-135.. if not athletic 120-125
I’m exactly 5’3” and that’s at least 20 lbs too high for me. I also have bones the size of matchsticks, though. Maintaining my weight has been more of a battle in the last few years (thank you, Post-40 Metabolism), but I’ve still managed to keep it between 98-103 without doing anything crazy.
Part of that is due to having such a small frame—tiny bones are less forgiving, so I quickly start feeling uncomfortable at just a few lbs over the top end of that range. My clothes don’t fit right, I have less agility, I get winded more easily, etc. And of course those things tend to compound and exacerbate the entire situation, so I try to course correct early.
I truly can’t imagine how awful it would be with 70+ more lbs. That’s almost a whole other me. And even if you’re of sturdier stock than I am, there’s no way carrying another 40-50% (at minimum!) of extra weight on your back every day wouldn’t negatively affect your health or quality of life. :wah:
re: Transgenderism
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 2/27/25 at 6:57 pm to UFFan
quote:
If you imagined that you’re a spoon, can you imagine that the rest of society would cater to you?
No, but I’d imagine they’d cater with me.
re: Has anyone on the left expressed outrage over what the USAID $$$ was earmarked for?
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 2/7/25 at 11:27 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
You make a very fair argument (which I really appreciate). Personally, I just don't see the point in letting myself get outraged over something I can't control. We're really arguing semantics here though. I agree with y'all that most, if not all, of the USAID funding should be eliminated and it's frustrating to see my tax dollars going to such waste.
When you put it in those terms, it’s easier to understand your perspective and accept that we’re not so far apart, at least on the fundamentals. Appreciate the thoughtful response.
re: Has anyone on the left expressed outrage over what the USAID $$$ was earmarked for?
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 2/7/25 at 8:35 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
I’m not quite as emotional and dramatic as y’all so I don’t express outrage over politics, but I’m glad Trump is getting rid of a lot of wasteful spending.
Honest questions, to which I hope you’ll respond in kind:
Even allowing for the assumption that this is nothing more than “wasteful spending”, absent of any malice or corruption, is there not a level of wasteful spending at which you believe taxpayers have a right to be outraged? Is the issue of diverting tens, if not hundreds, of millions to programs that are facially absurd and lacking any real transparency or accountability not far more significant and emotionally-charged than, say, a few government offices buying a couple hundred dollars of paper clips that never get used?
In other words, are you truly asserting that even the kindest possible interpretation of this situation it isn’t distinguishable from any other everyday, ordinary political disagreement?
re: Southeast Severe Weather: 12/28 - 12/29
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 12/28/24 at 10:50 am to NorthEndZone
Looks like the tornado-warned storm north of Katy may have put one on the ground. Pretty good CC dropout showing.
re: California to open special session preparing for anti-Trump lawsuits
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 12/2/24 at 8:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not claiming that. If you had someone with a legit didactic memory (which isn't that common, if it exists at all), they could probably do that with Barbri and some writing background...and an IQ over 110.
Didactic or eidetic?
re: Ya boy is cooked: Biden wanders off into Amazon after speech
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/17/24 at 10:10 pm to DiamondDog
Field of Dreams did it better.
re: The NYT debunks RFK Jr. claims about Froot Loops
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/17/24 at 1:31 pm to Barbados
quote:
The ingredient list is roughly the same except for all the differences in the ingredient lists
which also happen to represent some of the primary ingredients that RFK Jr. is calling out as a sign of inexcusable laxity and/or corruption in federal oversight. “Orwellian” is not a compliment or a standard you should aspire to, people. :lol:
The lack of self-awareness is so remarkable that it defies belief. Seriously, you’ll never convince me that any adult human who’s capable of stringing enough words together to form the sentences in this story doesn’t KNOW how stupid this conclusion is, even if they’ll never admit it publicly.
re: What gives you the "ick" on a date?
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/17/24 at 12:57 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
quote:
Treating the waiters like sh*t
—
I've been surprised in my life at how common this is.
Been awhile since I’ve been in the dating pool, but in my professional life this is one big reason I take candidates for any position that remotely involves management/leadership skills out to lunch for their second interview.
Seeing firsthand how people treat their “subordinates” teaches you far more about who they really are than any CV, reference, or dating profile.
re: Biden to host OMB at WH on Wednesday
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/10/24 at 1:04 pm to idlewatcher
The headline confused me for a second. I genuinely forgot Biden was still President. :lol:
re: Elon Musk "They did, and they will get it!"
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/10/24 at 12:34 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
So what...I'd the rest of us end up with a better and safe existence...Free market allows that.
That’s been my biggest argument for years. People say that we shouldn’t vote for Trump because he’s only out to enrich himself. Okay … even if you accept that as fact (and ignore the probability of his opponents having the same goal), how exactly is that a problem if we we’re ALL much better off in the end?
re: Why do the talking heads think we care about the transfer of power
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/10/24 at 11:53 am to PalletJack
They’re not going for clout, although on some level they do relish the opportunity to play the “holier-than-thou” card with regard to J6. And they never miss one.
Their real agenda, though, is a lot more insidious: They’re just distracting everyone from whatever they’re doing behind the scenes to secretly undermine the whole process. Then when evidence of that frickery inevitably starts to trickle out, they’ll turn around and screech about how it can’t be true because they were so gracious and solicitous and Trump’s just trying to defame them because he refused to unify, and here are 4.37 million MSM articles to prove it.
Their real agenda, though, is a lot more insidious: They’re just distracting everyone from whatever they’re doing behind the scenes to secretly undermine the whole process. Then when evidence of that frickery inevitably starts to trickle out, they’ll turn around and screech about how it can’t be true because they were so gracious and solicitous and Trump’s just trying to defame them because he refused to unify, and here are 4.37 million MSM articles to prove it.
re: Allan Lichtman says the electorate failed, NOT his "13 Keys"
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/10/24 at 11:42 am to ole man
quote:
Your 13 keys were fricked just like you.
The thing is, they really weren’t. Had he applied them correctly they would have had solid predictive value, but instead he let his own bias confound them.
He fricked up his own system because he, the sole proprietor, couldn’t use it objectively. :lol:
re: Tweets That Didn’t Age Well:Dems Trust MSM Since They Are Better Educated Than Republicans
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/10/24 at 11:29 am to Toomer Deplorable
I hope at some point it dawns on these idiots that they’re not proving the point that they think they are with stuff like this. :rolleyes:
Obviously there’s some correlation between intelligence and academic achievement, but until you break down the data by the actual metric you’re purporting to measure, then you have no idea if that pool of “educated” people who trust the MSM are disproportionately composed of people who managed to get some sort of college degree in spite of having a decidedly average or even below-average IQ.
And that doesn’t even touch on the idea that, even if these people are higher-IQ on paper, they’re not automatically more emotionally intelligent or pragmatic than people who are likely only a few points down the scale from them on average.
The whole premise is so weak that you don’t know whether to be angry about how disingenuous they’re being, or embarrassed for them that they’re too dumb to realize how weak it is.
Obviously there’s some correlation between intelligence and academic achievement, but until you break down the data by the actual metric you’re purporting to measure, then you have no idea if that pool of “educated” people who trust the MSM are disproportionately composed of people who managed to get some sort of college degree in spite of having a decidedly average or even below-average IQ.
And that doesn’t even touch on the idea that, even if these people are higher-IQ on paper, they’re not automatically more emotionally intelligent or pragmatic than people who are likely only a few points down the scale from them on average.
The whole premise is so weak that you don’t know whether to be angry about how disingenuous they’re being, or embarrassed for them that they’re too dumb to realize how weak it is.
re: Ella Emhoff seemingly loses her mind over step mom Kamala loosing to Trump
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/9/24 at 2:26 pm to LSUSkip
quote:
I will once again pile on that liberal women are very unattractive.
What I find so hard to understand is that this seems to be the image she’s deliberately trying to cultivate. She’s never going to be classically beautiful, but what healthy, stable woman goes out of her way to make herself less conventionally attractive when she knows she’s in the public eye?
And yes, I do realize I just answered my own question … but the point still stands. I guess it also doesn’t help that in her case she’s been rewarded with the attention she appears to have been seeking.
re: CNN analyst becomes unhinged when told ‘boys shouldn’t play girl sports’
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/9/24 at 11:47 am to scottydoesntknow
quote:
That black dude probably just got red pilled right there. He realized he was the only one at the table willing to admit that the emperor has no clothes
Shermichael Singleton is a Republican. Given how young he is, I’m not sure he was ever anything but red-pilled.
re: Here's the 2024 Presidential Election County Map
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/7/24 at 8:25 pm to LSUSkip
quote:
ETA: what I did notice was that Lincoln parish went for Trump. I'm not an expert on the area, but I know that's where Grambling is, and I've driven through Grambling a few times, it's depressing. I really would have thought it would have been blue.
If you’re not familiar with the area, you may not realize that Ruston is also in Lincoln Parish (just a very few miles from Grambling, in fact). Between the permanent residents and the LA Tech student body, you’re looking at a comparatively much more conservative/Republican demographic that outnumbers the combined population of Grambling U and Grambling proper by at least a 3:1 margin.
re: Harris Campaign: "Feeling Really Good About What We're Seeing"
Posted by DeepBlueSea on 11/5/24 at 1:16 pm to moontigr
Sounds more like damning with faint praise than anything.
Popular
0











