Remiden

You missed the post 2 above you.

He said he wouldn't transfer back.

Not really.

Clemson files lawsuit against the ACC over exit fees.

First FSU, now Clemson with many saying UNC is close behind. One big difference I've noticed between Clemson and FSU's lawsuit is that Clemson is challenging that the contract does not give the ACC media rights to the schools. If Clemson wins this, it would almost immediately sink the ACC like the PAC 2. Stanford and Cal have to be like "Haven't we already seen this show?"

I wonder if we will see the SEC at twenty teams this time next year., and if so, which 4? I know UNC is the big prize, FSU after them, but would we take Clemson, Duke, or a reunion with GT? Since distance doesn't seem to be a factor with any of this, I think it a great way to give the finger to the BIG10 would be to somehow get ND. I dint want them, but it would be funny.

There are basically no rules left that the ncaa will try to enforce.

I'm sure if he transfers back he will be eligible.

I read he is being recruited as a safety for us.

What it seems I'm hearing about Milroe, and I really like it, it's that he is not the most natural person when it comes to learning offenses, but if he doesn't get the starting spot, it won't be because he didn't put everything he has into it.

The other interesting part of that is the "relearning" comment. I wonder if meant Jalen needing to relearn the position because he didn't fundamentally understand parts of being a quarterback, or was Rees's offense so far off from what DeBoer's that everyone in the room needed a reset.

If it was Jalen, then it speaks more about O'Brien and Rees's development of him than it does about Jalen and would explain some of the concerns other posters have brought up.

It's a forum. The mods can't tell the members here to believe you or not to give you shite. And the mods have no inside info (maybe Boz) or a better feel for what is true or not than anyone else here. Just post it. The worst that will happen is a few downvotes and some replies saying you are full of it. No one will remember it in three weeks either way.

So because I would prefer the topic of Tide Football, not get derailed by religious arguements and instead keep that talk, which has nothing to do with Tide Football, in the off-topic area makes me the internet police? You you attacking me for stating my preference makes you nothing more than a hypocrite, doing the exact thing you are whining about, being the internet police. If you feel noone should tell someone else what opinions they can post, why are you telling me I can't post my opinion that a football topic should remain a football topic?

I'm not trying to control the subject. The subject of this conversation, Tide Football, is in the top part titled Subject. I would just like to stay in the actual subject. I didn't go to a Subject titled Christian VS Muslim debate and try to tell people to talk about Alabama football.

And my comment wasn't meant just for the person I was replying to, it was meant for the whole board. I post from my phone, I'm not sure how to reply to multiple people, so I replied to the last person who posted.

Let's leave religious discussions out of football threads. There is an O-T lounge for that. No good ever comes from online religious debates, especially ones that challenge other people's faith, and the last thing I think anyone on here wants is 3 or 4 pages in the middle of the football thread that is not about football.