honeybadger07
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | The Woodlands |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 4434 |
| Registered on: | 7/6/2015 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Over/under till Jayden caves (fires momager, gives Pickett his blessing for #5)?
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/15/26 at 8:24 am to mdomingue
quote:
No one at any NFL organization would care about that in this sort of situation.
I bet you know this from all of your time spent working the front offices of an NFL organization.
1
re: This is why Talarico is going to flip Texas
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/13/26 at 5:08 pm to Roaad
Why do we do this every election with Texas?
re: Dallas airport installing foot washing stations
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/12/26 at 5:37 pm to Night Vision
I may or may not mistake it as a urinal
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/12/26 at 10:25 am to fightin tigers
No they didn’t dude, they did zero phase trial testing on pregnant women and had only been giving the shot for 3 months when he told America it was safe for pregnant women.
What do you not understand about that? Not one woman had even gone full term. Not woman had reached the 3rd trimester. Please tell me how you can say it’s safe from miscarriages when neither of these milestones had been reached for pregnant women?
Link me to any data that shows clinical testing was done on pregnant women before December 2020.
A 10 year old can understand this. What is holding you back from comprehending this I just can’t help you with.
Phase 1 trial testing started in April 2020.
Phase 3 trial testing began in July 2020.
All phase trials tested women if they were pregnant as they did NOT want to test it on pregnant women, both Pfizer and Moderna.
Released for public use December 2020.
Text messages in January 2021.
Public told in March 2021 it is safe for pregnant women.
So not only are you wrong on the fact they had data in March 2021 to support the statement that it was safe or not for pregnant women but it is impossible for the shot to have been available for a year as you stated.
Please link to any data supporting your narrative that proves that at the point in time Fauci told the public it was safe.
You won’t because it doesn’t exist in the timeframe we are speaking of.
Sit down
What do you not understand about that? Not one woman had even gone full term. Not woman had reached the 3rd trimester. Please tell me how you can say it’s safe from miscarriages when neither of these milestones had been reached for pregnant women?
Link me to any data that shows clinical testing was done on pregnant women before December 2020.
A 10 year old can understand this. What is holding you back from comprehending this I just can’t help you with.
Phase 1 trial testing started in April 2020.
Phase 3 trial testing began in July 2020.
All phase trials tested women if they were pregnant as they did NOT want to test it on pregnant women, both Pfizer and Moderna.
Released for public use December 2020.
Text messages in January 2021.
Public told in March 2021 it is safe for pregnant women.
So not only are you wrong on the fact they had data in March 2021 to support the statement that it was safe or not for pregnant women but it is impossible for the shot to have been available for a year as you stated.
Please link to any data supporting your narrative that proves that at the point in time Fauci told the public it was safe.
You won’t because it doesn’t exist in the timeframe we are speaking of.
Sit down
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/12/26 at 9:03 am to fightin tigers
So frustrating when having a discussion and someone lacks the ability to use critical thinking skills.
Using your thinking abilities, you would take any medication a doctor tells you is safe when they have zero clinical data and trial testing to support that recommendation. They just have a warm fuzzy feeling and think you will be fine. I sure hope they guess correctly! Although this could thin the herd of the retards so not all that bad.
Hahaha…that is what you are arguing here.
Good luck dude
Using your thinking abilities, you would take any medication a doctor tells you is safe when they have zero clinical data and trial testing to support that recommendation. They just have a warm fuzzy feeling and think you will be fine. I sure hope they guess correctly! Although this could thin the herd of the retards so not all that bad.
Hahaha…that is what you are arguing here.
Good luck dude
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/12/26 at 8:54 am to fightin tigers
quote:
Says the guy arguing against data that is half a decade old
I’m not arguing the data today and I have already said this numerous times.
Im discussing the data that was known or unknown at the time it was told to the public there were no issues for pregnant women when not a single woman had even reached the 3rd trimester.
Why are you so dense that you can’t understand this?
I guess I just have to realize that not all people have the ability to comprehend discussions that require a little bit of critical thinking.
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 9:57 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Yes, vaccines were rolled out late December 2020. The statements were made 3 months later after thousands of women ran and took the vaccine.
Now please explain to everyone how you can claim someone has no risk for a miscarriage when not one person that took the vaccine had given birth to a full term baby? Oh and that not one clinical trial was done on pregnant women.
I honestly can’t wait to be educated on this!
Apologies for the lashing out, people with limited comprehension skills annoy me at times.
Case in point.
I really need to learn to be more understanding of their limits and truly apologize.
Now please explain to everyone how you can claim someone has no risk for a miscarriage when not one person that took the vaccine had given birth to a full term baby? Oh and that not one clinical trial was done on pregnant women.
I honestly can’t wait to be educated on this!
Apologies for the lashing out, people with limited comprehension skills annoy me at times.
Case in point.
I really need to learn to be more understanding of their limits and truly apologize.
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 9:49 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Because there was no chance of it happening. Like saying the vaccine would cause people to have broken legs. The mechanism just doesnt exist.
Yup…confirmed you are in fact retarded.
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 9:21 pm to fightin tigers
Again you are retarded.
It is reckless that the person leading the implementation of the vaccine rollout was out stating that it is safe for pregnant women to take the vaccine when he does not know one way or the other how it will affect them. In private he shares concerns there could be a problem with miscarriages, then goes public stating it is fine with no actual clinical proof. He got lucky AF and turns out it had minimal effect on this one issue of miscarriages and it just as easy could have gone the other way because no one fricking knew and ZERO clinical trials were done.
This lack of clinical data is not just for miscarriages but also how the child will be after birth. What type of side effects could this vaccine have on the child when it is born. NONE of this was known when statements were made it was safe to take.
You really are dumb AF and clearly cannot comprehend the discussion that is taking place.
Go play with your playdoh.
Oh wait, first go on and tell me all about the clinical trials on pregnant women first!!
It is reckless that the person leading the implementation of the vaccine rollout was out stating that it is safe for pregnant women to take the vaccine when he does not know one way or the other how it will affect them. In private he shares concerns there could be a problem with miscarriages, then goes public stating it is fine with no actual clinical proof. He got lucky AF and turns out it had minimal effect on this one issue of miscarriages and it just as easy could have gone the other way because no one fricking knew and ZERO clinical trials were done.
This lack of clinical data is not just for miscarriages but also how the child will be after birth. What type of side effects could this vaccine have on the child when it is born. NONE of this was known when statements were made it was safe to take.
You really are dumb AF and clearly cannot comprehend the discussion that is taking place.
Go play with your playdoh.
Oh wait, first go on and tell me all about the clinical trials on pregnant women first!!
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 8:11 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Lmao…
And not a single one of the 10,000 pregnant women had even given birth when this statement was made. The vast majority had not even made it to the 2nd trimester.
Hahahahaha
Are you willfully this stupid or does it come natural?!?!
And not a single one of the 10,000 pregnant women had even given birth when this statement was made. The vast majority had not even made it to the 2nd trimester.
Hahahahaha
Are you willfully this stupid or does it come natural?!?!
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 8:08 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Clinical trials were over
Yes tell me about the clinical trials on pregnant women!!!
quote:
assumptions
Thanks for making my point dumb arse hahaha
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 8:07 pm to lsupride87
And how many had given birth by this announcement?
shite, how about how many had seen the 2nd trimester by this time?
I laugh out loud at your stupidity.
Try harder
shite, how about how many had seen the 2nd trimester by this time?
I laugh out loud at your stupidity.
Try harder
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 4:22 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Please show the evidence that supported his recommendation.
Clown
Clown
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 4:21 pm to fightin tigers
Clinical trials tested women for being pregnant before accepting them into trial phasing as they did NOT want pregnant women testing out the vaccine.
According to Pfizer’s, 12 women given the vaccine made it through trials after getting pregnant after the trials had started.
Sit down dude.
According to Pfizer’s, 12 women given the vaccine made it through trials after getting pregnant after the trials had started.
Sit down dude.
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 4:16 pm to Ingeniero
You did not test that theory before he said pregnant women can take it.
Go see how many pregnant women were tested during trial phases and get back to me on how he had enough evidence to support recommending it.
In the end, the data may have shown it didn’t cause more miscarriages..but we had “Mr Science” stating there was zero to worry about and recommending it with no actual phase trial data to support that claim and this was not told to the public that no clinical testing had been done to support this recommendation.
Try harder
Go see how many pregnant women were tested during trial phases and get back to me on how he had enough evidence to support recommending it.
In the end, the data may have shown it didn’t cause more miscarriages..but we had “Mr Science” stating there was zero to worry about and recommending it with no actual phase trial data to support that claim and this was not told to the public that no clinical testing had been done to support this recommendation.
Try harder
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 4:12 pm to NawlinsTiger9
April of 2021 is when the CDC guidance came out…4 months after it came out for public use and for a vaccine that was intentionally NOT tested on pregnant women before that.
Let me repeat…CLINICAL PHASE TRIALS WERE NOT TESTED ON PREGNANT WOMEN.
Let me repeat…CLINICAL PHASE TRIALS WERE NOT TESTED ON PREGNANT WOMEN.
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 4:07 pm to fightin tigers
The shot was approved for use by the FDA in December of 2020 with phase 1 trial testing on humans starting in April of 2020. So as I stated before, it was under a year (only a month available to public).
For the trial phases both Moderna and Pfizer tested people for being pregnant as they DID NOT WANT TO TEST ON PREGNANT WOMEN. 12 women made it through the cracks on Pfizer being pregnant in phase trials and a small undisclosed amount for Moderna.
So you tell me how in the hell is one supposed to say one way or the other if it is safe for pregnant women when the trials were intended to avoid pregnant women.
So I ask again…how can he have concern it could cause problems and then less than a month later tell the public there is no concern with ZERO evidence to support that claim. In the end it may have turned out not to cause it, but it also could have and he is making recommendations with no evidence to support it.
Try harder dumb frick
For the trial phases both Moderna and Pfizer tested people for being pregnant as they DID NOT WANT TO TEST ON PREGNANT WOMEN. 12 women made it through the cracks on Pfizer being pregnant in phase trials and a small undisclosed amount for Moderna.
So you tell me how in the hell is one supposed to say one way or the other if it is safe for pregnant women when the trials were intended to avoid pregnant women.
So I ask again…how can he have concern it could cause problems and then less than a month later tell the public there is no concern with ZERO evidence to support that claim. In the end it may have turned out not to cause it, but it also could have and he is making recommendations with no evidence to support it.
Try harder dumb frick
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 1:47 pm to fightin tigers
I am stating that the shot had been available for less than a year...
Therefore, there is a limited sample size of women who have been vaccinated for him to be of the opinion in private text there could be an issue with miscarriage's and then a month later state publicly there is no issues. He obviously saw there was data to potentially support a higher rate of miscarriage's and there would not have been enough data (less than a month) to show a divergence in that trend in that short amount of time.
How someone takes my initial statement and takes it as I dont understand how long a pregnancy last is pretty special person.
Honestly , its crazy this has to be explained. But I get it, some people are mentally challenged and lack the ability to read and comprehend.
Appears we found one of those people.
Therefore, there is a limited sample size of women who have been vaccinated for him to be of the opinion in private text there could be an issue with miscarriage's and then a month later state publicly there is no issues. He obviously saw there was data to potentially support a higher rate of miscarriage's and there would not have been enough data (less than a month) to show a divergence in that trend in that short amount of time.
How someone takes my initial statement and takes it as I dont understand how long a pregnancy last is pretty special person.
Honestly , its crazy this has to be explained. But I get it, some people are mentally challenged and lack the ability to read and comprehend.
Appears we found one of those people.
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 11:41 am to fightin tigers
3 months
What are you even getting at? The retardation is real and very strong!
But I am impressed you know the lengths of pregnancy and how to divide it up into 3rds.
Sounds like you were a bit premature, probably born late 2nd trimester.
What are you even getting at? The retardation is real and very strong!
But I am impressed you know the lengths of pregnancy and how to divide it up into 3rds.
Sounds like you were a bit premature, probably born late 2nd trimester.
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 10:27 am to fightin tigers
No retard...I am asking how do you have sufficient evidence that it was or was not good for pregnant women when it was not even available for a full year of case studies. It never should have been given to pregnant women without actual testing and there is no way this rat could reverse course in one month based on data after privately stating it shows signs of miscarriage to then saying its totally safe for pregnant women.
Common sense would understand this, retards not so much.
Common sense would understand this, retards not so much.
re: Tesla Owners: What’s the Worst Part of Owning a Tesla?
Posted by honeybadger07 on 8/11/26 at 8:01 am to Tony The Tiger
Honest question - why go through all this trouble to have an electric vehicle when you can just buy a ICE vehicle and free to do whatever you want?
Popular
11
