re: Voxdawg is Famous

It is, but LARP in the instance of those who desperately hope that Q isn't plugged into the Trump administration like to toss that around, indictating that they think it's some 16 y/o kid in a basement in Nebraska, playing pretend on the internet.

Just followed you

Holy geez we have people on this board that buy into the Q crap? That’s unfortunate.

You're awfully well-versed in the parlance for a mud-slinger Jeff.

Methinks the lady doth protest to much.

With the myriad proofs that have come forward, it's mathematically impossible for the QTeam NOT to be operating from within the Trump administration.

All the whacked-out shite that you believe in, and THIS is a bridge too far?

Keep it up, and you're going to lose those all-important sponsorship dollars from Dale's Dead Bug.

quote:

---

IIRC the Q posts pointed to this way before the evidence started to mount.

---

The evidence was mounting before the election, it was covered by Hannity. Alex Jones covered alot of it.

If Q isn't just a basement dipshit, then he might be Alex Jones. He and Roger Stone are butt buddies.

If you're looking for straight-up, irrefutable proof from the administration that it's legit and fully sanctioned by DJT, you're not going to get that.

Yet.

Yes, Sarah Sanders was asked what the administration's position regarding the Q phenomenon, back last August, but if you were paying attention, it was largely a non-answer. This was pretty much to be expected. There have been some fringe actions attributed to "QAnon followers" by the MSM, but their agenda is pretty clear, as it is.

Want proof? Check any of these links and see what sort of narrative is being built.

You don't need Q to know that there's absolutely a Deep State very much alive and kicking in DC and elsewhere. The actions of Clapper, Brennan, Sally Yates, Peter Strzok and the cast of characters in Spygate will confirm as much.

You don't need Q to know that the Trump Administration has declared war on human trafficking.

You don't need Q to see that Hillary Clinton absolutely received preferential treatment by the FBI and DOJ with respect to the investigations into Uranium One, Benghazi and the myriad bad looks concerning her private email servers.

You don't need Q to question what happened on the tarmac during the "impromptu" meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch in June 2016, where many have speculated that a SCOTUS seat for Lynch was likely promised if she'd call off the FBI investigation of HRC's email server(s). We're told they talked about grandchildren and golf.

You don't need Q to track the goings of of the FBI in Little Rock in 2018, with multiple 737s loaded with pallets and pallets of documents suspected to be related to all of the Clinton Foundation organizations.

You don't need Q to tell you that 70k+ sealed court records filed by US Attorneys in 2017 & 2018 is highly irregular when compared to 1.4k-2k indictments/records in other years during previous administrations.

You don't need Q to identify that there's an established resistance to the Trump administration in practically every MSM outlet (yes, even Fox News - e.g. Shep Smith, Brett Baer and others), and by extension Trump supporters.

At some point in the relatively near future, some intrepid journalist will do their homework, and given an opportunity to ask POTUS directly about Q, he'll give an answer.

What that answer will be, we have no clue, but given the fact that there have been scores of Q shirts, signs, banners, etc (as recently as his El Paso border wall rally), there have been plenty of times to address it on his own, if he felt the connection was improperly inferred.

There's a distinct chance that he's not going to answer any single question directly other than "Mr. President, are you Q+?"

Could it turn out to be something other than what those of us who follow the movement?


At the moment, without absolute confirmation from the WH that this is an official back channel communications operation, there's an element of faith that is involved. If you take Hebrews 11:1's definition, then it's "Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."

That's far from an unreasonable statement, but the evidence that opens your eyes is likely different from what put it on my radar. We call that the Red Pill. Yours will be different than mine.

quote:

---

Holy geez we have people on this board that buy into the Q crap? That’s unfortunate.

---

It takes a village.
Go Dawgs

quote:

---

Don't you see the arrogance?

---

Rig,I know you have a love for numbers ,stay strong.

17 > 17

I reached out to Vox on page 4020. Just trying to be a good Dawg.
His reply was very cordial, seems like good people.
Go Dawgs