re: Our Next 1000 Yd Receiver?

I don't think its sad. Again, going back to the last page. I would guess 80% of those were successful. Successful in the way the analytics guys define it...you can Google the actual definition...too lazy to find it so don't push back on this point please

Gunner didn't like over the middle throws and Zach is what 5'10" at best? Gunner would need to see him wide arse open to even attempt the throw.

We got him the ball more than any WR in our history and using screens was how we accomplished that. He was our best play maker. I don't see the problem. Does that translate to the NFL? Probably not at the rate we did it but he is going to be drafted higher than he would have at USC. Which is a win.

This thread would have been better for the Kirby clip I posted in the spring Practice thread. Check it out. Kirby said only one school has had more WR drafted over the past 7 years. Obviously a lot of those are mid to late rounders but still

About what?

God, you're a whiny bitch.

If you think of screen passes as running plays, the re-weighted averages are:
Corner 2.7%
Post 2.7%
Out 24.3%
In 10.8%
Comeback 2.7%
Curl 10.8%
Slant 19.0%
Crossing 13.5%
Go 13.5%