Started By
Message

re: Let's talk Wide Receivers

Posted on 12/9/19 at 9:55 pm to
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28530 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

but I wonder if downfield blocking was the primary point of emphasis for this group. Imposing their will and stuff.


I said the same thing this summer and got
killed on here for it and think it's still a valid point.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
6045 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

I said the same thing this summer and got killed on here for it and think it's still a valid point.


There's no correlation between valid points and this board's opinion. Prior to this season if you questioned whether Fromm was spending enough offseason voluntary time with his receivers, it brought howls of outrage. Now I guess it's starting to sound like a pretty good idea.
Posted by BigDaddyDawg
Washington D.C.
Member since Sep 2017
1329 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 10:22 pm to
We lost Holloman too for what that’s worth.

I like the plan of attack, really unfortunate about Blaylock as I think he showed the most potential outside of Pickens.

Hopefully we have a couple of studs coming in
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36821 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 10:31 pm to
you didn't even mention our best returning receiver got kicked off the team
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
77062 posts
Posted on 12/9/19 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

you didn't even mention our best returning receiver got kicked off the team


Didn't have to, I knew three of you would point it out.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•Twitter