re: Let's get political!

Feel free to prove the report false.

I'm sure Fox is spitting the truth.

Re; immigration...the orange man said he doesn't even want to deport illegals anymore unless they are criminals.

quote:

---

the orange man said he doesn't even want to deport illegals anymore unless they are criminals.

---

Welfare fraud is criminal….anything else Nancy?

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

If it happens, that equals 8$ a gallon for gas boys and girls

Wow. I didn't know the US imported fertilizer through the Straight of Hormuz.

Man, I want to thank you for opening up my eyes.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

China keeping their supply for domestic use.

Last one for the night ..what are the odds that Israel listens to this?

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

I am going out on a limb that if you bumped your head hard enough, a pussy would fall out.

We have a net import of about 5% on nitrogen….and 1/3 of that comes from Canada.

We also get some from Venezuela, which we can now lift embargo and get even more

US farmers are not impacted by nitrogen shortages through the strait

It would make sense for other countries to secure Hormuz, the countries that actually depend on it.

Why aren't they?

quote:

---

Funny how they just found out about that site now. Very convenient

Guess they lied last year when they said the nuclear sites were destroyed? Or bad Intel?

---

It was published last June that we only hit 2 of their 3 nuclear enrichment facilities.

It was also mentioned last June (but not confirmed at the time) that Iran moved enriched uranium at 60% (and enough for 11 nuclear warheads) to another facility prior to the bombing in 2025. Iran confirmed in the talks 2 weeks prior that they had the enriched uranium.

I don't know specifics. The third facility is deep underground. My guess is that the third facility was offline (as a reason it was not targeted). Maybe it wasn't hit because the uranium from that facility did not exceed 5% (and 2-5% is perfect for an electrical grid for the people). But moving 60% enrichment to that facility resets the clock to weapons grade within weeks. Even if the uranium doesn't reach weapons grade, it still reaches "dirty bomb" status on the missiles.
Iran doesn't have to rebuild facilities when they had a 3rd one left.



Ossof asks Gabbard a question. She answers. Then he says false.
No offense, but he is wrong. The president constitutionally has final say on imminent threat. All of the executive branch are advisors to the president. To imply that they have the same powers as the president is laughable.
Saying "false" is about as impactful as Joe Biden telling a foreign adversary "don't do it".
As is common with all congressional hearings, the Senator is grandstanding for the camera.



I asked you to define imminent threat and what would be required in your personal definition to change from threat to imminent.

Crickets....


Lastly, why do you keep downplaying the threat from Iran? North Korea doesn't fund terrorism. They haven't kidnapped Americans. Fought us in wars since 1953.

North Korea hasn't sent missiles unprovoked at a NATO country.

I'd overlook this but you've double-downed on Iran as a neutral neighbor and even referenced North Korea as a contrast.