Started By
Message
re: i keep hearing about penalties Georgia should have gotten the other night.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:04 am to IT_Dawg
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:04 am to IT_Dawg
Problem is, he didn't even hit King in the chest. He hit him in the head first. There is no video angle to show it, but sometimes common sense prevails. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know how physics works. Watch this gif, Kings head is the first thing to move. If he was hit in the chest, his head would have moved FORWARD, not BACKWARDS. He got hit in the head/facemask by the crown of Jackson's helmet. Targeting to the letter.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 10:06 am
4
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:08 am to GT1
Look at you trying so very, very hard. Maybe you should look at the two obvious ones against tech...you know, Lovett in the endzone - and remind us of how the tech player hurt his neck...
Take your crying back to stingtalk...starting to sound OSU after Bullard cleaned house
Take your crying back to stingtalk...starting to sound OSU after Bullard cleaned house
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:17 am to GT1
They almost never call targeting between the tackles. Especially in a scrum. Football would be over if they did. Your QB was beat up and tired from being run like a rented mule and was running upright. Thats what happens.
The much much clearer targeting was on our #6 when he scored the TD. Crystal clear. No call.
Frankly, the football gods wanted you to lose for all the low level cut blocks. They smite cut blockers with great fury and whatnot.
The much much clearer targeting was on our #6 when he scored the TD. Crystal clear. No call.
Frankly, the football gods wanted you to lose for all the low level cut blocks. They smite cut blockers with great fury and whatnot.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:46 am to GT1
Shut up little bitch
Your target our player in the end zone, Radi even showed it on twitter
Holding all night long and fake PI in OT in the end zone to give you another play to win it
Jackson's head hit the ball first which is why it popped out so far
Kings head was naturally going backwards due to any hit put on him. That is what happens when you get tackled
Your target our player in the end zone, Radi even showed it on twitter
Holding all night long and fake PI in OT in the end zone to give you another play to win it
Jackson's head hit the ball first which is why it popped out so far
Kings head was naturally going backwards due to any hit put on him. That is what happens when you get tackled
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:46 am to Spaceman Spiff
quote:
Look at you trying so very, very hard. Maybe you should look at the two obvious ones against tech...you know, Lovett in the endzone - and remind us of how the tech player hurt his neck...
Take your crying back to stingtalk...starting to sound OSU after Bullard cleaned house
Trying so very, very hard? That isn't trying hard my man. It's the exact letter of the rule. Lovett in the endzone was shoulder to shoulder. If you'd like I can make you the exact same type of gif and show you that Ahmari Harvey's head goes in front of Lovett's head and they collide shoulders. But if you want to play that game, so let's say they do call that targeting... he caught it and scored anyway so what? 15 yarder on kickoff? Still get a touchback? No change. If the CORRECT call is made against Jackson, you lose the game. Huge difference in no-calls there.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:47 am to Dawg4Life47
quote:
Kings head was naturally going backwards due to any hit put on him. That is what happens when you get tackled
Simple physics prove you to be a dumbass here. On a slow mo replay like that, his head would not be the first part of his body that moves backwards unless he was hit in the head.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 10:52 am
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:51 am to Peter Buck
quote:
They almost never call targeting between the tackles. Especially in a scrum. Football would be over if they did. Your QB was beat up and tired from being run like a rented mule and was running upright. Thats what happens.
The much much clearer targeting was on our #6 when he scored the TD. Crystal clear. No call.
Frankly, the football gods wanted you to lose for all the low level cut blocks. They smite cut blockers with great fury and whatnot.
Read what I said above about targeting on Lovett. It was shoulder to shoulder. Even if it had been called targeting there is no different outcome, he scored anyway. Also that's BS about it not being called between the tackles. The whole premise of targeting is to keep players from lowering their head like that. It's just as, if not more dangerous to the tackler than the ball carrier. It was targeting. You UGAg fans dont even have the balls to say, yep we got the breaks at the end and glad we did. You just won't ever admit you got help, but boy oh boy when you play Bama, let's cry about some refs!!! Anyhooo.. I'm out of here after this just was dropping by to show you the proof. Keep praising Jackson for tackling like that if you want and hopefully he'll David Pollack himself.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:53 am to GT1
quote:
Trying so very, very hard? That isn't trying hard my man. It's the exact letter of the rule. Lovett in the endzone was shoulder to shoulder. If you'd like I can make you the exact same type of gif and show you that Ahmari Harvey's head goes in front of Lovett's head and they collide shoulders. But if you want to play that game, so let's say they do call that targeting... he caught it and scored anyway so what? 15 yarder on kickoff? Still get a touchback? No change. If the CORRECT call is made against Jackson, you lose the game. Huge difference in no-calls there.
The people who still support rampant cut blocking also support targeting calls between the tackles. These are also the same people who pioneered flag boys. Congrats, you are the Vagina Nation.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:56 am to GT1
quote:
Read what I said above about targeting on Lovett. It was shoulder to shoulder. Even if it had been called targeting there is no different outcome, he scored anyway. Also that's BS about it not being called between the tackles. The whole premise of targeting is to keep players from lowering their head like that. It's just as, if not more dangerous to the tackler than the ball carrier. It was targeting. You UGAg fans dont even have the balls to say, yep we got the breaks at the end and glad we did. You just won't ever admit you got help, but boy oh boy when you play Bama, let's cry about some refs!!! Anyhooo.. I'm out of here after this just was dropping by to show you the proof. Keep praising Jackson for tackling like that if you want and hopefully he'll David Pollack himself.
Watch at 3 minutes. In fact, watch the whole thing. Then tell the world no helmet to helmet.
LINK
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:58 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
As for the hit on King, we got very lucky. Jackson led with the crown of his helmet and never lifted up until after he hit King in the chest. On review, they should have changed it to targeting
There was nothing, absolutely nothing said about the hit on Lovett when he caught the TD in the end zone to get us to 20. He was almost knocked out and had to be led off the field by his team mates. Scroll to the 153:57 mark and tell me that wasn't targeting, yet crickets from the announcers.
LINK
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:13 am to GT1
simple physics, show me where the simple physics made this targeting and you not a little bitch
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:13 am to Peter Buck
It's like they still run a version of the triple option
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:16 am to GT1
Oh yea, did I forget to mention frick off back to stingtalk with your other soy boys?
I saw your crying threads "we was robbed" "meh, sec refs" "i hate them soo much" "oooo dawgs"
I saw your crying threads "we was robbed" "meh, sec refs" "i hate them soo much" "oooo dawgs"
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:20 am to Peter Buck
quote:
Watch at 3 minutes. In fact, watch the whole thing. Then tell the world no helmet to helmet.
Here ya go. Slo mo gif. Forwards and backwards. Nobody said their helmets didn't touch. GT helmet clearly in front of UGA helmet. GT even turns his head away at the last second. Not leading with helmet, they hit shoulders at the same their helmets hit.. the front of UGA guy hits the side of GT helmet. Maybe they did miss a targeting here on your guy lol. GT guy head is up, UGA guy head is down is why he got hurt. This is leading with the shoulder and their heads made incidental contact. The UGA players head doesn't even move when you see the GT helmet go in front of his, so they don't touch there. He doesn't move until they hit shoulders. If you say that is targeting, then you also have to admit you targeted on Marvin Harrison Jr in the semi final because it's the exact same.
LINK
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 11:23 am
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:21 am to Dawg4Life47
quote:
simple physics, show me where the simple physics made this targeting and you not a little bitch
Ahh yes, I'm the little bitch but the whole CFB world agrees except UGA fans. As usual.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:26 am to SemperFiDawg
quote:
here was nothing, absolutely nothing said about the hit on Lovett when he caught the TD in the end zone to get us to 20. He was almost knocked out and had to be led off the field by his team mates. Scroll to the 153:57 mark and tell me that wasn't targeting, yet crickets from the announcers.
Look at my post above this. Also, either way, like I said, that one doesn't change anything if you do call it, so call it if that's what you think. But you still can't not call the other.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:47 am to GT1
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:50 am to GT1
No they don't but they do all agree of your fans being bitches
Even Haynes King said it wasn't targeting
He got the wood laid to him and couldn't take it
Even Haynes King said it wasn't targeting
He got the wood laid to him and couldn't take it
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:51 am to Peter Buck
So Tech got away with 2 obvious targets and UGA with 1 between the tackles with a QB that ran the ball 30 times already and was running upright and Tech is the one who got screwed?
This is from the people who still cut block and pioneered flag boys.
This is from the people who still cut block and pioneered flag boys.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:54 am to GT1
quote:
CORRECT
The correct one was made. Even your QB said it wasn't targeting. What a little phag
Page 2 of 5
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News