Started By
Message
Estimated CFB Budgets - from The Athletic
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:03 am
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:03 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Free article.
Does UGAs position surprise you?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:15 am to Wwarmouth
I remember when this dumb shite started less than 5 years ago the big concern from coaches was that a competitive roster would cost $15M lmao
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:38 am to WG_Dawg
Miami probably spending close to that for Toney and Mensah alone
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:42 am to Wwarmouth
I would be surprised if that’s accurate. I don’t know how UGA could retain its team at that number.
My guess is the cost of retention is consistently underestimated.
My guess is the cost of retention is consistently underestimated.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 9:53 am
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:51 am to Wwarmouth
It doesn't surprise me. Every team gets conference money, gate money, logo money. As far as I know, UGA doesn't have any billionaires who are all-in on contributions. Our crowd funding efforts have been lackluster. We haven't been aggressive about corporate sponsorships. We give away a home game every two years to Georgia Tech.
Georgia Tech got paid $10 million to play UGA at Mercedes Benz. Auburn took a big paycheck to play the Baylor game in Atlanta. Georgia's fan base is so enamored with tradition that the concept of changing the way we operate is routinely rejected out of hand, at least by the folks on message boards. Maybe those attitudes will change when teams with more money start routinely pillaging our roster and results on the field suffer. Until then, I can't see any reason why UGA would be near the top of the list.
Georgia Tech got paid $10 million to play UGA at Mercedes Benz. Auburn took a big paycheck to play the Baylor game in Atlanta. Georgia's fan base is so enamored with tradition that the concept of changing the way we operate is routinely rejected out of hand, at least by the folks on message boards. Maybe those attitudes will change when teams with more money start routinely pillaging our roster and results on the field suffer. Until then, I can't see any reason why UGA would be near the top of the list.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 10:14 am
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:03 am to Crowknowsbest
Rusty and those types always like to say that other schools have to outbid UGA by 3x to win the battle due to development pitch and results...take with a grain of salt of course
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:07 am to Wwarmouth
Yeah, I don’t believe that degree of discount is accurate. There’s no way we could keep Nate Frazier for $500k if OSU is offering $1.5M, for example. I could see UGA pushing that narrative as PR. I could also see UGA pushing the “poor us” narrative to help fundraising. A lot of schools do that.
I don’t think UGA is a top spender, but I would think they’d be closer to at least Alabama on the chart just based on roster quality.
I don’t think UGA is a top spender, but I would think they’d be closer to at least Alabama on the chart just based on roster quality.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 10:12 am
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
3






