Started By
Message
Down 7pts next week at the half
Posted on 9/7/25 at 9:53 am
Posted on 9/7/25 at 9:53 am
Rushing is not stellar but moving the ball and the passing is under 100 yards, do you bring in Pugs?
12
Posted on 9/7/25 at 10:12 am to Dawg4Life47
No.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 10:15 am to Dawg4Life47
Am I missing 2 or 3 starting OL?
Posted on 9/7/25 at 10:18 am to Dawg4Life47
Take the under
Posted on 9/7/25 at 10:49 am to Dawgfanman
You are missing Gaston and Greene
Posted on 9/7/25 at 10:49 am to Dawg4Life47
Pugs will not see the field this season outside of injury or garbage time. I think Kirby is the best coach in CFB, but if he has one fault it’s loyalty.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 10:55 am to Dawg4Life47
quote:
You are missing Gaston and Greene
Then I need Gunners ability to get out of trouble and improvise. And his maturity to not give up the ball trying to win it for us. Lean on defense, special teams and run game while he develops.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 10:56 am to Dawgfanman
Dude, do NOT bring logic into this scenario.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 10:58 am to Dawgfanman
Ok, in your scenario you are staying with Gunner? And is that no matter what?
And being down 21pts to Tenn and putting Pugs in the 4th after it’s over is not an option you can choose.
And being down 21pts to Tenn and putting Pugs in the 4th after it’s over is not an option you can choose.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 11:03 am to Dawg4Life47
quote:
Ok, in your scenario you are staying with Gunner? And is that no matter what? And being down 21pts to Tenn and putting Pugs in the 4th after it’s over is not an option you can choose.
I didn’t say that. You asked down by 7 at half, I’m sticking with the QB in that scenario. Down 21 and it’s over, if I think Stockton is done for the day and it’s lost. I’m going with Pugs.
But honestly, I don’t see Stockton as the lost cause some seem to. I’ve been a fan since before he signed and think he’s done ok so far.
Next week is a huge test for the entire team and I really hope some of the OL are healthy and the whole team is locked in. Might still not be enough to win at this point but it’s what we got.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 11:04 am to Dawgfanman
My question was was question not accusation I am playing out scenarios and extended the ones mentioned
Posted on 9/7/25 at 11:05 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
But honestly, I don’t see Stockton as the lost cause some seem to. I’ve been a fan since before he signed and think he’s done ok so far.
I just think he is qb 2 based on his skill sets
Posted on 9/7/25 at 11:45 am to Dawg4Life47
I would agree if we had a better OL but as is I think we need Gunner's dual-threat toughness.
If our OL can improve, then Puglisi appears to be the better pocket passer.
I can definitely see using both of them in specific situations.
I would prefer Gunner in the red-zone and Puglisi moving down the field and if we are behind with limited time.
If our OL can improve, then Puglisi appears to be the better pocket passer.
I can definitely see using both of them in specific situations.
I would prefer Gunner in the red-zone and Puglisi moving down the field and if we are behind with limited time.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 11:54 am to Dawg4Life47
It depends. Is it 7-0 with nothing going on offensively, or is it 21-14 and we’re just having trouble getting off the field defensively?
Posted on 9/7/25 at 12:12 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
21-14 and we’re just having trouble getting off the field defensively
Posted on 9/7/25 at 12:53 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
trouble getting off the field defensively?
No I don’t think this defense is going to have trouble getting off the field.
Honestly everyone is crying about the offense but I see no praise for how good this defense is.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 12:57 pm to Griffindawg
I was just speaking in hypotheticals. I don’t expect UT to move the ball well on UGA’s defense.
Unfortunately I suspect we’ll be 3-and-out a lot ourselves, but we’ll see
Unfortunately I suspect we’ll be 3-and-out a lot ourselves, but we’ll see
Posted on 9/7/25 at 1:01 pm to Griffindawg
I think the D has played well and everyone knows it.
The disparity is sooo glaring with the O that it has to be talked about.
I mean we are watching OU and MSU QB’s look like actual heisman types, while we are scared to throw more than 15 yards.
Is that because we can’t? Or saving the plays? Not sure why we would save those plays for 2 full games if so.
The disparity is sooo glaring with the O that it has to be talked about.
I mean we are watching OU and MSU QB’s look like actual heisman types, while we are scared to throw more than 15 yards.
Is that because we can’t? Or saving the plays? Not sure why we would save those plays for 2 full games if so.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 1:02 pm to Crowknowsbest
Tennessee is going to stack the box to stop the run and force Georgia to pass.
Posted on 9/7/25 at 1:09 pm to Dawgy49
quote:
Tennessee is going to stack the box to stop the run and force Georgia to pass.
I’m actually not sure about that until we prove we can run it on their base front. If I were them, I’d make UGA prove (1) we can run it on a power 5 front, (2) throw into coverage, and (3) drive incrementally down the field without negative plays and penalties.
I don’t think they want to be playing a lot of man coverage. That just simplifies things for Gunner.
Page 1 of 8
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News