Started By
Message
re: Another CMR fail, or fails.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:32 pm to RattletrapDawg
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:32 pm to RattletrapDawg
quote:
It does not matter if you do deserve it. Take a chance and beat the crap out of your opponent. You just never know.
What world are you living in? If we win out and 2 undefeated a lose we go, period.
And did we not just beat the crap out of auburn?
2
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:33 pm to Alapaha
This all I am saying Alapaha. Then I am done here.
UGA's goal is to climb the ladder in looking better than the teams above them. Get the style points just in case the teams above you faulter.
UGA's goal is to climb the ladder in looking better than the teams above them. Get the style points just in case the teams above you faulter.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:33 pm to gatorhata9
rattle trolling
and he's catching a mess..
and he's catching a mess..
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:34 pm to gatorhata9
quote:Not enough to impress the pollsters. IMO.
And did we not just beat the crap out of auburn?
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:36 pm to K9
quote:Actually, I am filling the boat with DisneyDawgs.
rattle trolling
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:41 pm to RattletrapDawg
quote:
Take a chance and beat the crap out of your opponent. You just never know
Unless any of the the other 3 undefeated teams above us lose ... it doesn't how matter how bad we beat an opponent, if they don't lose .. we ain't jumping them. Why is this so hard for you to understand? We could have won by 100 and it wouldn't matter ... the Ducks, KSU, and the Irish win ... we stay put ... no rocket science there.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:43 pm to RattletrapDawg
quote:
I am filling the boat with DisneyDawgs.
I far from a Disney Dawg there Rattle ... and you know it.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:44 pm to Alapaha
quote:Sorry, its happened before. Why give up and not try? That is all I am saying.
Unless any of the the other 3 undefeated teams above us lose ... it doesn't how matter how bad we beat an opponent, if they don't lose .. we ain't jumping them. Why is this so hard for you to understand? We could have won by 100 and it wouldn't matter ... the Ducks, KSU, and the Irish win ... we stay put ... no rocket science there.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:45 pm to Alapaha
quote:You are the only one that found the little hole in the net. You must have lost some weight.
I far from a Disney Dawg there Rattle ... and you know it.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:58 pm to RattletrapDawg
quote:
Sorry, its happened before. Why give up and not try? That is all I am saying.
Really? When? When has an undefeated team from a major conference ever been left out of the national title game in favor of a one loss team from another conference?
I'll be waiting.
Edit: I'll make this easy. 2004 Auburn and 2009 Cincinnati are the only undefeated teams from major conferences (and yes, the Big East blows but it still counts) left out, but in 2004 USC and Oklahoma were both undefeated and in 2009 Alabama and Texas were also undefeated.
This post was edited on 11/10/12 at 11:03 pm
Posted on 11/10/12 at 11:01 pm to RattletrapDawg
I've been doomsday dawg for a long time but give the team props.
Dominating performance!!
Dominating performance!!
Posted on 11/10/12 at 11:09 pm to VADawg
Utah I believe. Don't laugh. That Utah team that beat Bama would beat this years K State and Oregon. 2008. I think it was.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 11:10 pm to RattletrapDawg
Utah was Mountain West in 2008. Not a major conference
Posted on 11/10/12 at 11:16 pm to VADawg
You are the one that put the Major Conference stipulation on it. I just said it has happened before. And I was right. Utah was a very good team that year. They stomped Bama in a bowl that year.
This post was edited on 11/10/12 at 11:17 pm
Posted on 11/10/12 at 11:27 pm to RattletrapDawg
Well no kidding I put a major conference stipulation on it. My point is that one loss Georgia will never get in over undefeated Oregon, K-State or ND. It just won't happen. But if, say, Fresno State was undefeated, a one loss UGA team would get in over them without hesitation. That's how the system works.
If any of them do lose, UGA jumps them as long as they keep winning. As has been proven in the BCS time and time again, when you lose matters as much as anything. See 2007 West Virginia, Oklahoma State last year, Texas and Texas Tech in 2008, etc...
If any of them do lose, UGA jumps them as long as they keep winning. As has been proven in the BCS time and time again, when you lose matters as much as anything. See 2007 West Virginia, Oklahoma State last year, Texas and Texas Tech in 2008, etc...
Posted on 11/10/12 at 11:35 pm to VADawg
Don't let off the gas. Don't quit. That's all I am saying.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 11:45 pm to VADawg
You cannot defeat good logic
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:14 am to RattletrapDawg
Rattle, all that matters at this juncture is winning. The only thing that will allow us to "Jump" the other three is if they lose. if/when they lose, the SEC will not be snubbed. They did that to Auburn in 04 because the conference hadn't had an opportunity to represent itself. Now that the SEC has 6 of the last 13 National Title games, they will not be jumped by another conference as long as we have enough wins to justify being there. All that matters now is winning the SECCG. The winner of the SECCG WILL play for all the marbles if, and only if, two of the remaining three unbeatens lose.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:40 am to DawgHolliday
quote:
38-0 doesnt LOOK as good as 66-21
It tells me that they allowed 3 TD's. I see your point but UGA has other things to play for. Now if UGA had gone into this game with no chance of going to the SECCG they would have put a half a hundred on them. I'm glad to see the players more concerned about winning games than looking ahead to the NFL.
Posted on 11/11/12 at 10:48 am to ycdawgfan
quote:
It tells me that they allowed 3 TD's. I see your point but UGA has other things to play for. Now if UGA had gone into this game with no chance of going to the SECCG they would have put a half a hundred on them. I'm glad to see the players more concerned about winning games than looking ahead to the NFL.
Meh, it seemed to me that bobo started getting VERY conservative about halfway through the 3rd. I think if we kept playing like we started that 75 wouldn't have been out of the question. But there really isn't a need to do that. Heck, lets say he did, and Auburn started playing dirty, like they do, and knocked out Murray/Marshall/Gurley for the tech or SECCG? Then what? Then everybody is pissed he kept the starters in to run up the score. I have no problem with what I saw yesterday.
Page 3 of 3
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News