Started By
Message
re: What is your Realistic Timeline for a Coaching Change?
Posted on 11/21/16 at 3:40 pm to AggieDub14
Posted on 11/21/16 at 3:40 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
I feel like Sumlin will get 2 more years.
I really hope we don't give him 2 more years of this stuff. I can see letting this go one more year but 2 more... that seems too long.
Against best competition in the West (assuming we lose Thursday)... we will be 1 -9 vs Bama and LSU. I just don't see this turning around with Sumlin at the helm with the kind of offense and defense we have on the field.
Not that concerned about the Saban era. We can't even get over the LSU hump so the Saban hump is way out there.
Sumlin has built a good conference USA/Big 12 team. Mostly a finesse offense and a defense that is well below average. Unfortunately this doesn't work in the SEC against the better teams and it has almost no chance against the best SEC teams.
Posted on 11/21/16 at 3:42 pm to Tridentds
I don't see him getting 2 years unless he has a 9+ regular season wins next year. I was more trying to be devils advocate on this one.
Posted on 11/21/16 at 3:46 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
This is what is wrong with a lot of our fanbase
I think the biggest problem isn't our attitude, but a contract (from a now fired AD) that guaranteed all his buyout money within 60 days (instead of payment over years most buyouts have).
I supported the shite out of that extension when we did it, as I didn't want to look like a stepping stone plus I didn't want to hire a coach the same cycle as Texas (and presumably get a worse one on paper). But now that same buyout is our handcuffs.
For a program like ours it isn't good enough to spend a lot, build a lot and fill the stadium. You also have to get lucky and we never do.
Posted on 11/21/16 at 3:57 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
I don't see him getting 2 years unless he has a 9+ regular season wins next year. I was more trying to be devils advocate on this one.
I get that. It's definitely not outside the realm of possibility. I think your post was basically on the mark.
Posted on 11/21/16 at 4:54 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
This is what is wrong with a lot of our fanbase
Yes. It's the fanbase who is getting those Wins and Loses. The fanbase is also the ones who call the shots when it comes to hiring/firing coaches and payi.....err recruiting players.
Posted on 11/21/16 at 6:41 pm to AggieDub14
One more year. The program still has momentum and stability compared to tu and LSU.
It's going to be tougher next year with the schedule and with key players leaving.
If Sumlin wins next year he stays. If he doesn't, then he goes
It's going to be tougher next year with the schedule and with key players leaving.
If Sumlin wins next year he stays. If he doesn't, then he goes
Posted on 11/21/16 at 11:35 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
With the exception of Homer Norton, each one of these coaches won either a conference or national title before year 5 (Norton won both in year 6).
This is year 5 for us. This is Saban's 4th West title only interrupted by a string of horseshoes flying out of Malzahn's arse. My point: judging an SECW coach on conference titles over the last 5 years is fairly shallow thinking, to be polite.
That doesn't mean Sumlin shouldn't be judged but let's use a metric that is actually meaningful instead of some frivilous concept of comparing vs a 7 team SWC when (3 or more of the teams don't bother to even try) . Have an opinion. State your opinion. It's unnecessary to be intellectually dishonest is expressing it because winning an internet warrior battle isn't gonna win you a teddy bear.
quote:
Kevin Sumlin will likely be the only coach in A&M history with at least 6 seasons to fail to win a conference or a national title.
I haven't looked at it in a while but I believe Bama is something like 35-4 in conference games since we joined and no one else in the West is above 3 games over .500. I think its us that is 2nd too but everyone hovers around .500 except Arky. Everyone has to play everyone else and we all lose to Bama.
This is big boy football and there are only two kinds of coaches: legends and guys that are gonna get fired. Sometimes a guy can fit in both categories eventually (Bowden, Mack, Miles). But it's fairly likely everyone in the West save Saban will eventually be fired. Because that's how this shite works.
And it isn't because they aren't good coaches, but because expectations for every school in the West is for top 10 finishes and occasional conference titles (except State but Mullen is still wearing out his welcome). As long as Saban sucks up all the oxygen, no one is going to consistently meet those expectations.
Posted on 11/21/16 at 11:36 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
Emphasis on realistic
"realistically" it won't be this year so y'all can simmer down some.
But the money can be as bipolar as many on this board so you can never really say such things with much certainty, especially with a game that really matters Thursday. But I'd put the odds pretty low as of right now
Next year is likely a decision year. You either fire him or extend him. There's not much middle ground.
Posted on 11/21/16 at 11:51 pm to tmc94
quote:
This is year 5 for us. This is Saban's 4th West title only interrupted by a string of horseshoes flying out of Malzahn's arse. My point: judging an SECW coach on conference titles over the last 5 years is fairly shallow thinking, to be polite.
Winning the west is difficult. But not only are we not winning, we're not even competing on a year-to-year basis
2013 - 3 games back of SECW champ
2014 - 4 games back of SECW champ
2015 - 3 games back of SECW champ
2016 - 3 or 4 games back of SECW champ
If we have to accept that Sumlin is incapable of putting together a team that can win the West, can we at least expect him to be 2nd best every now and then?
Posted on 11/22/16 at 12:09 am to NanosTacoRun
sure, I think that's fair. But it's not exactly like anyone else is pushing them either. That's sort of the point. Everyone has a good year here or there but no one is pushing Bama consistently which seems to be some's expectation of us.
The reason is that LSU, Auburn, OM, Arky, and even State are pretty good programs too. Everyone loses to someone along the way because even the "bad" teams really aren't that bad outside of Arky or Auburn in '12.
But I wasn't responding to that. I was responding to CGSC's silly narrative.
The reason is that LSU, Auburn, OM, Arky, and even State are pretty good programs too. Everyone loses to someone along the way because even the "bad" teams really aren't that bad outside of Arky or Auburn in '12.
But I wasn't responding to that. I was responding to CGSC's silly narrative.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 12:52 am to tmc94
quote:
But it's not exactly like anyone else is pushing them either.
2013 - Auburn won the west
2014 - MSU was 1 game back entering the last weekend (but didn't have the tiebreaker)
2015 - Ole Miss was 1 game back entering the last weekend (and had the tiebreaker)
2016 - no good 2nd team
quote:
But I wasn't responding to that. I was responding to CGSC's silly narrative.
I get that. But just like the "Sumlin hasn't won the west" crowd needs to acknowledge that Bama is a juggernaut right now, the people saying "Bama is winning everything" must also acknowledge that there are a bunch of teams between us and Bama every year. If we're winning 9, 10, 11 games a year, but unable to get over the Bama-hump, I don't think people would be ready to give up on Sumlin.
But he's not even putting us in the picture where a good break or two results in a division championship. Or in a mess of a year like 2016, just taking care of business could have potentially resulted in playoff berth.
This post was edited on 11/22/16 at 12:52 am
Posted on 11/22/16 at 1:06 am to NanosTacoRun
but you are conveniently leaving out that we finished a game back in 2012. It's like that year didn't exist.
So
2012 - LSU /A&M
2013 Auburn
2014 State
2015 OM
2016 no one
It is what it is. He's the GOAT.
But over our 5 years, everyone but Arky has done it exactly once. And IIRC, everyone has finished in the top 10 exactly once. It is not and hasn't been Bama and 5 easy wins.
Any discussion of coach performance has to begin here if we are to be intellectually honest.
That doesn't mean it's good enough. But if you are going to hold a strong opinion, it should be based upon reality. I think many are flat lying to themselves because of emotion.
What would be success over the last five years? (and you have to honestly recognize where we were 5 years ago)
Over the next 5? If the answer (assuming Saban doesn't retire) is to win multiple SEC titles, you're just being delusional. Now don't get me wrong, most on fan sites are (and I mean that in a nice way), but way too many are setting themselves up for a situation where anything short of perfection and their lives are ruined. But I guess it's just the age we live in
So
2012 - LSU /A&M
2013 Auburn
2014 State
2015 OM
2016 no one
It is what it is. He's the GOAT.
But over our 5 years, everyone but Arky has done it exactly once. And IIRC, everyone has finished in the top 10 exactly once. It is not and hasn't been Bama and 5 easy wins.
Any discussion of coach performance has to begin here if we are to be intellectually honest.
That doesn't mean it's good enough. But if you are going to hold a strong opinion, it should be based upon reality. I think many are flat lying to themselves because of emotion.
What would be success over the last five years? (and you have to honestly recognize where we were 5 years ago)
Over the next 5? If the answer (assuming Saban doesn't retire) is to win multiple SEC titles, you're just being delusional. Now don't get me wrong, most on fan sites are (and I mean that in a nice way), but way too many are setting themselves up for a situation where anything short of perfection and their lives are ruined. But I guess it's just the age we live in
Posted on 11/22/16 at 1:32 am to tmc94
2012 happened, although I find it harder and harder with each passing year to credit Sumlin for that team. The toughness, the fight has disappeared under his watch. But I didnt include it because everyone recognizes that was a successful year. It's the following years that are going to get Sumlin fired.
Success the last 5 years would include 10 wins last year, 10 wins this year (before a bowl).
I'm not sure what success under Sumlin the next 5 years looks like. I think the window has opened and closed, unless Stidham or Mond is All-SEC in 2018, and we're just playing things out until Sumlin's buyout becomes affordable.
Success the last 5 years would include 10 wins last year, 10 wins this year (before a bowl).
I'm not sure what success under Sumlin the next 5 years looks like. I think the window has opened and closed, unless Stidham or Mond is All-SEC in 2018, and we're just playing things out until Sumlin's buyout becomes affordable.
This post was edited on 11/22/16 at 1:34 am
Posted on 11/22/16 at 7:00 am to NanosTacoRun
quote:
2012 happened, although I find it harder and harder with each passing year to credit Sumlin for that team. The toughness, the fight has disappeared under his watch.
For all the physical tools that JFF brought to the field, maybe his greatest attribute IMHO was his refusal to lose and his ability to get us teammates to buy in. The 2012 team believed they would win and in moments that seemed out of reach, Manziel would pull the team aside and motivate them to dig a little deeper.
We haven't had that level of leadership until TK. Idk how you cultivate that as a CEO or I'd be rich AF. But I feel like that's something that Sumlin and staff don't do enough of or we wouldn't lose games we're supposed to win.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 7:04 am to tmc94
quote:
I was responding to CGSC's silly narrative.
Which silly narrative? The one about Sumlin never winning a conference title after 10 years of coaching or the one about Sumlin being the ONLY A&M coach who won't win a title of any kind after 6 years? Or is it the one where an A&M coach shouldn't lose to two 6+ loss teams back to back?
Posted on 11/22/16 at 7:19 am to CGSC Lobotomy
2012 happened. That's the best argument in favor of Sumlin.
Then again 2011 was preseason #8, and 11-1 at halftime or whatever. all those guys came back except tannehill, and our two best scout team players were as advertised. What was sumlins contribution? Letting them play loose? Changing the strength and conditioning? He's taken a well built albeit thin Sherman roster and successfully made it worse with better recruits.
Then again 2011 was preseason #8, and 11-1 at halftime or whatever. all those guys came back except tannehill, and our two best scout team players were as advertised. What was sumlins contribution? Letting them play loose? Changing the strength and conditioning? He's taken a well built albeit thin Sherman roster and successfully made it worse with better recruits.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:02 am to tmc94
Expecting us to be finishing second in the west at least a year or two and winning 9-10 games. I don't think anyone here who is realistic expects us to be topping Bama right now. But another 8-4 season is very disappointing if we don't win Thursday. We should at least be in that second spot behind Bama once or twice with a Sugar Bowl appearance to show for it by this point. The fact that Ole Miss and MSU will have NY6 bowl appearances in this five year span and we most likely will not is unacceptable I think.
This post was edited on 11/22/16 at 8:04 am
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:15 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Expecting us to be finishing second in the west at least a year or two and winning 9-10 games. I don't think anyone here who is realistic expects us to be topping Bama right now. But another 8-4 season is very disappointing if we don't win Thursday. We should at least be in that second spot behind Bama once or twice with a Sugar Bowl appearance to show for it by this point. The fact that Ole Miss and MSU will have NY6 bowl appearances in this five year span and we most likely will not is unacceptable I think.
Not to mention we're one of like 5 teams to have over 50% blue-chips on the roster the last few years. That's about as objective as it gets.
So yeah, expecting to unseat bama would be unreasonable, but what are reasonable expectations for a top 5 recruited roster?
What are reasonable expectations for a top 5 paid coach/staff?
What are reasonable expectations for recruiting when we built top 5 facilities?
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:17 am to Nguyening
quote:
What was sumlins contribution? Letting them play loose? Changing the strength and conditioning?
To his credit, his staff did move Damontre Moore to rush end (he was playing outside linebacker under DeRuyter) and actually turned Dustin Harris into a serviceable DB.
In addition, he did check Christine Michael's ego.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 10:08 am to tmc94
quote:
Next year is likely a decision year. You either fire him or extend him. There's not much middle ground.
Annnnnd he's going to be fired unless he lands Stidham and the kid just sets the world on fire. So most likely: fired. I don't think it'll really be much of a decision. He should be fired this year, but won't because it doesn't make sense due to the fiscal liabilities created by the buyouts.
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top


1




