Started By
Message
re: Randolph Duke taking it to the next level.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 3:50 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 2/3/14 at 3:50 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
It'll be a fricking novel whatever it is. But that's not him being a no life loser, it somehow means he's smarter than all us aggys. 

Posted on 2/3/14 at 3:51 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Have you ever seen a guy research and write the hell out of a topic that means complete DICK more than Charles?
I've had research findings disproven, but nothing as meaningless.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 3:53 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I will say that something good came out of this stupidity.
I became curious today about a couple of my old units, so I looked on Wikipedia. I was able to correct some inaccuracies about accounts of our OIF deployments and found out that I'm owed a valorous unit award that was finally approved 5+ years after my unit left Iraq. (For the record, anyone in 3rd Brigade, 4 ID during OIF 1 is owed a VUA as of May 2009)
I became curious today about a couple of my old units, so I looked on Wikipedia. I was able to correct some inaccuracies about accounts of our OIF deployments and found out that I'm owed a valorous unit award that was finally approved 5+ years after my unit left Iraq. (For the record, anyone in 3rd Brigade, 4 ID during OIF 1 is owed a VUA as of May 2009)
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 2/3/14 at 3:54 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I assume you were getting paid or would receive some form of credit for your research above and beyond the mere discredit of your non-rival's lore?


Posted on 2/3/14 at 3:55 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Except then he'd be calling DoD a liar since they don't allow ROTC programs to officially contract cadets until their junior year. Not even service academy cadets sign their contract until their junior year.
I know this and you know this but apparently he dosen't know this

Posted on 2/3/14 at 3:56 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
I assume you were getting paid or would receive some form of credit for your research above and beyond the mere discredit of your non-rival's lore?
Are you kidding me? How do you think most Generals are able to take credit for publishing TMs and FMs? Off the backs of Majors.
It did land me a published article though, surprisingly enough. While minor in scope, I still can claim that I'm a "published author".
Posted on 2/3/14 at 3:59 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Are you kidding me? How do you think most Generals are able to take credit for publishing TMs and FMs? Off the backs of Majors.
It did land me a published article though, surprisingly enough. While minor in scope, I still can claim that I'm a "published author".

but, wait. So is Randy:
LINK



Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:02 pm to KaiserSoze99
Actually, I'm published in a newspaper article in the Colorado Springs Gazette from June 2003 (I think it was titled "Ft Carson unit received combat insignia") and the Army Recruiter Journal in April 2010 (regarding how a commander's attitude determines the mark he/she leaves).
A little bit more of an audience than some obscure sip blog.
A little bit more of an audience than some obscure sip blog.
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:04 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I was just playing with you. I know your publications are real, under your given name, rather than under a message board handle, which is nothing more a glorified rant post for Mr. Satterfield.


Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:07 pm to KaiserSoze99
I'm sure if he REALLY wants to "set me straight" he can come find me. I'm not that hard to locate if you really are that determined.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:08 pm to Agforlife
quote:
Ok someone who isn't ip banned over there needs to post his personal info.

Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:11 pm to WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
Didn't he post on Shaggy that it was all just a big troll to show that A&M is a cult and that he had accomplished his mission? I think that was around the same time TA posters outed him.


Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:13 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Needs More Bourbon
I like the SECrant thread where they alternate between laughing at Randolph's obsession with A&M to lauding Texags for plotting to expose him.
Hi Randolph & Shaggy!




Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:16 pm to WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
quote:
WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
I have seen your subtle work there my friend. Bravo


Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:19 pm to WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
Why are we putting energy into this again? Is it to protect our trademark or to neuter (to quote The Running Man) "A dickless moron with a battery up his arse"?
Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:21 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Why are we putting energy into this again?
I haven't read much of this thread nor do I give a rat's arse about this guy, but I cannot fathom how most of you don't understand that his mission in life is to rustle your jimmies. This thread proves he's succeeding. I asked that it be anchored
Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:23 pm to tmc94
quote:
tmc94
Nah man we ate just having a little fun. We all agree he has an unhealthy obsession and if we can keep him focused on us maybe he won't go out and shoot somebody.

This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:26 pm to Agforlife
quote:
have had my static ip banned and it just ain't worth setting up a proxy to just piss them off
Simple 3 minute steps to setup a proxy if you're interested.


ETA: I find it funny that even if he registers over here he can't get on our board to post. He just has to watch.


This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:29 pm to tmc94
Honestly didn't think the thread would blow up like this. It'll die in a day or two. I think everyone is just interested because of Seattle getting so much press this week.
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
