Started By
Message
re: 2017 Taylor Hamm Recruiting VIP Info Thread
Posted on 7/12/16 at 10:38 am to DBU
Posted on 7/12/16 at 10:38 am to DBU
quote:because in all honesty his shite isn't as bad as people want to believe. He's a douche and continues to put himself in shitty situations, but generally the news you get from him is alright. Is he right 100% of the time? No. But no one is.
Why do y'all let Hamm do this to you?
This post was edited on 7/12/16 at 10:38 am
Posted on 7/12/16 at 10:46 am to DBU
Hamm's information isn't THAT bad, it's all relative for us since our recruiting guys are terrible. He just acts like a douche and is creepy with high school kids
Stidham was interested coming out of high school and I know Tech fans did some pretty heinous shite when he decommitted, so it's not that unbelievable. I'm not getting my hopes up but was just trying to generate discussion
Mond committed to Baylor when Stidham was there so it may not matter
Stidham was interested coming out of high school and I know Tech fans did some pretty heinous shite when he decommitted, so it's not that unbelievable. I'm not getting my hopes up but was just trying to generate discussion
Mond committed to Baylor when Stidham was there so it may not matter
This post was edited on 7/12/16 at 10:47 am
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:23 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
That defense in 2017 though, woof
Is it really that bad?
Yes, we lose Myles Garrett and Daeshon Hall on the defensive line and Justin Evans (likely Armani Watts as well) in the secondary.
Here's what we retain:
Seniors: Qualen Cunningham, Jarrett Johnson, Zaycovan Henderson, Josh Walker, Priest Willis, Nick Harvey, Donovan Wilson, Noel Ellis, Victor Davis, Jordan Mastrogiovanni
Juniors: Daylon Mack, Richard Moore, Justin Dunning, Dwaine Thomas, Deshawn Capers-Smith, Riley Garner, Otaro Alaka, Landis Durham, Kingsley Keke, James Lockhart
Sophomores: Larry Pryor, Ikenna Okeke, Charles Oliver, Travon Fuller, Tyrel Dotson, Roney Elam, Justin Madubuike
Freshmen: Clifford Chattman
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:41 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Donovan Wilson could easily be gone too. A lot of people will need to step up to fill in the gaps and there is not much depth outside the secondary
Posted on 7/12/16 at 12:19 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Jordan Mastrogiovanni
Posted on 7/12/16 at 1:28 pm to Cooter Davenport
We beat out LSU, OU, ND, UCLA, and Arky for Mastro and now we have him as a walk-on.
Posted on 7/12/16 at 1:52 pm to Chill98
Hamm really seems to think we are going to get stidham. All day he has basically said we are probably getting him if we want him
Posted on 7/12/16 at 2:20 pm to WestCoastAg
Damm that would be great news
Posted on 7/12/16 at 2:24 pm to Chill98
quote:
We beat out LSU, OU, ND, UCLA, and Arky for Mastro
Sometimes everyone gets it wrong.
Posted on 7/12/16 at 2:28 pm to WestCoastAg
Setting up the Chernobyl melt if we don't, because everyone will read that as we passed. Classic Hamm
Posted on 7/12/16 at 2:36 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Or that mond told us no and we are handcuffing ourselves to QBs again 
This post was edited on 7/12/16 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 7/12/16 at 3:09 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Setting up the Chernobyl melt if we don't, because everyone will read that as we passed. Classic Hamm
Ehh... I dunno, I don't think anyone will melt. Landing the Stidham 2017 transfer, for us, is akin to a hail mary or winning the lottery. It's really sweet if you complete it/hit the jackpot, but only nuts expect it to happen and get upset if it doesn't. Stidham would be a really sweet karmic bonus, but if it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen. Based on how much we know our staff liked Stidahm the first time around, I don't think many would read it as a pass unless there is really solid info that we legitimately passed. Most likely, if we don't land him, it's because he's still mad about how it went down the first time, in which case my money is on him landing at LSU or Auburn, and not because we weren't interested.
This post was edited on 7/12/16 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 7/12/16 at 3:12 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
I'm not giving many cares about him
Posted on 7/12/16 at 3:37 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:
Ehh... I dunno, I don't think anyone will melt. Landing the Stidham 2017 transfer, for us, is akin to a hail mary or winning the lottery. It's really sweet if you complete it/hit the jackpot, but only nuts expect it to happen and get upset if it doesn't. Stidham would be a really sweet karmic bonus, but if it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen. Based on how much we know our staff liked Stidahm the first time around, I don't think many would read it as a pass unless there is really solid info that we legitimately passed. Most likely, if we don't land him, it's because he's still mad about how it went down the first time, in which case my money is on him landing at LSU or Auburn, and not because we weren't interested.
I think that's the point he's trying to make. The way Hamm appears to be painting the situation has the potential to make things much worse if he doesn't end up at A&M
Posted on 7/13/16 at 10:41 am to NanosTacoRun
quote:
I think that's the point he's trying to make.
No, it's not. He was making the case that now that Hamm has played-up the possibility of getting Stidham that everyone was going to freak out on Sumlin if he doesn't land him. I don't think that's the case, because I think our fans (properly) view it as a hail mary and won't hold it against Sumlin if it doesn't happen.
This post was edited on 7/13/16 at 10:41 am
Posted on 7/13/16 at 11:00 am to Cooter Davenport
You can disagree with me on how our fans might react, but that's absolutely the point I am trying to make
Posted on 7/13/16 at 11:07 am to Cooter Davenport
quote:
I don't think that's the case, because I think our fans (properly) view it as a hail mary and won't hold it against Sumlin if it doesn't happen.
I can think of at least one person whose name rhymes w/Dodger Marvin who will go probably nuclear on Sumlin over it
Posted on 7/13/16 at 11:14 am to Dr RC
Posters on 247 are already acting like Stidham is ours if we want him and debating Mond vs Stidham
Latest Texas A&M News
Back to top



0




